This converts some of the visually simpler cases that have been split
over multiple lines. I only did the ones that are easy to verify the
resulting diff by having just that final GFP_KERNEL argument on the next
line.
Somebody should probably do a proper coccinelle script for this, but for
me the trivial script actually resulted in an assertion failure in the
middle of the script. I probably had made it a bit _too_ trivial.
So after fighting that far a while I decided to just do some of the
syntactically simpler cases with variations of the previous 'sed'
scripts.
The more syntactically complex multi-line cases would mostly really want
whitespace cleanup anyway.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This is the result of running the Coccinelle script from
scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci. The script is designed to
avoid scalar types (which need careful case-by-case checking), and
instead replace kmalloc-family calls that allocate struct or union
object instances:
Single allocations: kmalloc(sizeof(TYPE), ...)
are replaced with: kmalloc_obj(TYPE, ...)
Array allocations: kmalloc_array(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE), ...)
are replaced with: kmalloc_objs(TYPE, COUNT, ...)
Flex array allocations: kmalloc(struct_size(PTR, FAM, COUNT), ...)
are replaced with: kmalloc_flex(*PTR, FAM, COUNT, ...)
(where TYPE may also be *VAR)
The resulting allocations no longer return "void *", instead returning
"TYPE *".
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Variable count is just being incremented and it's never used
anywhere else. The variable and the increment are redundant so
remove it.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Drop one redundant return statement and fix a few white space
issues.
Signed-off-by: Clayton Casciato <majortomtosourcecontrol@gmail.com>
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
'obj' is being initialized, however this value is never read as
'obj' is assigned an updated value later. Remove the redundant
initialization.
Clean up clang warning:
drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c:409:20: warning: Value stored to
'obj' during its initialization is never read
[clang-analyzer-deadcode.DeadStores]
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The log messages in processor_throttling.c is not in consistency,
we have some printk() calls with PREFIX, but some are not; also we
use pr_*() functions without prefix. So add pr_fmt() and unify
them with pr_*() functions.
While at it, fix some obvious coding style issues when going
through the functions.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Quite a few users of ACPI objects want to log a warning message if
the evaluation fails which is a repeating pattern, so introduce a
helper function for that purpose and convert some code where it is
open-coded to using it.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() macros are used for
message printing in the ACPICA code and they should not be used
elsewhere. Special configuration (either kernel command line or
sysfs-based) is needed to see the messages printed by them and
the format of those messages is also special and convoluted.
For this reason, replace all of the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and
ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances in the ACPI processor driver with
corresponding dev_*(), acpi_handle_*() and pr_*() calls depending
on the context in which they appear.
Also drop the ACPI_PROCESSOR_COMPONENT definition that is not going
to be necessary any more.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
The ACPI_PROCESSOR_CLASS macro is defined in <acpi/processor.h>,
and ACPI drivers for processor already included <acpi/processor.h>,
so we can remove those duplicated ACPI_PROCESSOR_CLASS macros.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Similar to commit 0266d81e9b ("acpi/processor: Prevent cpu hotplug
deadlock") except this is for acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe():
"The problem is that the work is scheduled on the current CPU from the
hotplug thread associated with that CPU.
It's not required to invoke these functions via the workqueue because
the hotplug thread runs on the target CPU already.
Check whether current is a per cpu thread pinned on the target CPU and
invoke the function directly to avoid the workqueue."
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
------------------------------------------------------
cpuhp/1/15 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffc90003447a28 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x4c6/0x630
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
cpus_read_lock+0x3e/0xc0
irq_calc_affinity_vectors+0x5f/0x91
__pci_enable_msix_range+0x10f/0x9a0
pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity+0x13e/0x1f0
pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity at drivers/pci/msi.c:1208
pqi_ctrl_init+0x72f/0x1618 [smartpqi]
pqi_pci_probe.cold.63+0x882/0x892 [smartpqi]
local_pci_probe+0x7a/0xc0
work_for_cpu_fn+0x2e/0x50
process_one_work+0x57e/0xb90
worker_thread+0x363/0x5b0
kthread+0x1f4/0x220
ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
-> #0 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
__lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0
lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680
__flush_work+0x4e6/0x630
work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160
acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250
acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580
acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740
acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140
acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0
cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120
cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0
smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440
kthread+0x1f4/0x220
ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
(work_completion)(&wfc.work) --> cpuhp_state-up --> cpuidle_lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(cpuidle_lock);
lock(cpuhp_state-up);
lock(cpuidle_lock);
lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work));
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by cpuhp/1/15:
#0: ffffffffaf51ab10 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0
#1: ffffffffaf51ad40 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0
#2: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0xa0/0xea
print_circular_bug.cold.52+0x147/0x14c
check_noncircular+0x295/0x2d0
__lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0
lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680
__flush_work+0x4e6/0x630
work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160
acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250
acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580
acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740
acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140
acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0
cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120
cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0
smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440
kthread+0x1f4/0x220
ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Based on 3 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version this program is distributed in the
hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even
the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular
purpose see the gnu general public license for more details
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version [author] [kishon] [vijay] [abraham]
[i] [kishon]@[ti] [com] this program is distributed in the hope that
it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see
the gnu general public license for more details
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version [author] [graeme] [gregory]
[gg]@[slimlogic] [co] [uk] [author] [kishon] [vijay] [abraham] [i]
[kishon]@[ti] [com] [based] [on] [twl6030]_[usb] [c] [author] [hema]
[hk] [hemahk]@[ti] [com] this program is distributed in the hope
that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the
implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular
purpose see the gnu general public license for more details
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-or-later
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 1105 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070033.202006027@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
With the enhanced CPU hotplug lockdep coverage the following lockdep splat
happens:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.12.0-rc2+ #84 Tainted: G W
------------------------------------------------------
cpuhp/1/15 is trying to acquire lock:
flush_work+0x39/0x2f0
but task is already holding lock:
cpuhp_thread_fun+0x30/0x160
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (cpuhp_state){+.+.+.}:
lock_acquire+0xb4/0x200
cpuhp_kick_ap_work+0x72/0x330
_cpu_down+0x8b/0x100
do_cpu_down+0x3e/0x60
cpu_down+0x10/0x20
cpu_subsys_offline+0x14/0x20
device_offline+0x88/0xb0
online_store+0x4c/0xa0
dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30
sysfs_kf_write+0x45/0x60
kernfs_fop_write+0x156/0x1e0
__vfs_write+0x37/0x160
vfs_write+0xca/0x1c0
SyS_write+0x58/0xc0
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc2
-> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++++}:
lock_acquire+0xb4/0x200
cpus_read_lock+0x3d/0xb0
apply_workqueue_attrs+0x17/0x50
__alloc_workqueue_key+0x1e1/0x530
scsi_host_alloc+0x373/0x480 [scsi_mod]
ata_scsi_add_hosts+0xcb/0x130 [libata]
ata_host_register+0x11a/0x2c0 [libata]
ata_host_activate+0xf0/0x150 [libata]
ahci_host_activate+0x13e/0x170 [libahci]
ahci_init_one+0xa3a/0xd3f [ahci]
local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
work_for_cpu_fn+0x14/0x20
process_one_work+0x1f9/0x690
worker_thread+0x200/0x3d0
kthread+0x138/0x170
ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40
-> #0 ((&wfc.work)){+.+.+.}:
__lock_acquire+0x11e1/0x13e0
lock_acquire+0xb4/0x200
flush_work+0x5c/0x2f0
work_on_cpu+0xa1/0xd0
acpi_processor_get_throttling+0x3d/0x50
acpi_processor_reevaluate_tstate+0x2c/0x50
acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x69/0xd0
cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xb4/0x8b0
cpuhp_up_callbacks+0x36/0xc0
cpuhp_thread_fun+0x14e/0x160
smpboot_thread_fn+0x1e8/0x300
kthread+0x138/0x170
ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
(&wfc.work) --> cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem --> cpuhp_state
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(cpuhp_state);
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem);
lock(cpuhp_state);
lock((&wfc.work));
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by cpuhp/1/15:
cpuhp_thread_fun+0x30/0x160
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 15 Comm: cpuhp/1 Tainted: G W 4.12.0-rc2+ #84
Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-4048B-TR4FT/X10QBi, BIOS 1.1a 07/29/2015
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x85/0xc4
print_circular_bug+0x209/0x217
__lock_acquire+0x11e1/0x13e0
lock_acquire+0xb4/0x200
? lock_acquire+0xb4/0x200
? flush_work+0x39/0x2f0
? acpi_processor_start+0x50/0x50
flush_work+0x5c/0x2f0
? flush_work+0x39/0x2f0
? acpi_processor_start+0x50/0x50
? mark_held_locks+0x6d/0x90
? queue_work_on+0x56/0x90
? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x154/0x1c0
? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
? acpi_processor_start+0x50/0x50
work_on_cpu+0xa1/0xd0
? find_worker_executing_work+0x50/0x50
? acpi_processor_power_exit+0x70/0x70
acpi_processor_get_throttling+0x3d/0x50
acpi_processor_reevaluate_tstate+0x2c/0x50
acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x69/0xd0
cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xb4/0x8b0
? lock_acquire+0xb4/0x200
? padata_replace+0x120/0x120
cpuhp_up_callbacks+0x36/0xc0
cpuhp_thread_fun+0x14e/0x160
smpboot_thread_fn+0x1e8/0x300
kthread+0x138/0x170
? sort_range+0x30/0x30
? kthread_create_on_node+0x70/0x70
ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40
The problem is that the work is scheduled on the current CPU from the
hotplug thread associated with that CPU.
It's not required to invoke these functions via the workqueue because the
hotplug thread runs on the target CPU already.
Check whether current is a per cpu thread pinned on the target CPU and
invoke the function directly to avoid the workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170524081549.620489733@linutronix.de
acpi_processor_get_throttling() requires to invoke the getter function on
the target CPU. This is achieved by temporarily setting the affinity of the
calling user space thread to the requested CPU and reset it to the original
affinity afterwards.
That's racy vs. CPU hotplug and concurrent affinity settings for that
thread resulting in code executing on the wrong CPU and overwriting the
new affinity setting.
acpi_processor_get_throttling() is invoked in two ways:
1) The CPU online callback, which is already running on the target CPU and
obviously protected against hotplug and not affected by affinity
settings.
2) The ACPI driver probe function, which is not protected against hotplug
during modprobe.
Switch it over to work_on_cpu() and protect the probe function against CPU
hotplug.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170412201042.785920903@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This was entirely automated, using the script by Al:
PATT='^[[:blank:]]*#[[:blank:]]*include[[:blank:]]*<asm/uaccess.h>'
sed -i -e "s!$PATT!#include <linux/uaccess.h>!" \
$(git grep -l "$PATT"|grep -v ^include/linux/uaccess.h)
to do the replacement at the end of the merge window.
Requested-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Roland Dreier reports that one of his systems cannot boot because of
the changes made by commit ac212b6980 (ACPI / processor: Use common
hotplug infrastructure).
The problematic part of it is the request_region() call in
acpi_processor_get_info() that used to run at module init time before
the above commit and now it runs much earlier. Unfortunately, the
region(s) reserved by it fall into a range the PCI subsystem attempts
to reserve for AHCI IO BARs. As a result, the PCI reservation fails
and AHCI doesn't work, while previously the PCI reservation would
be made before acpi_processor_get_info() and it would succeed.
That request_region() call, however, was overlooked by commit
ac212b6980, as it is not necessary for the enumeration of the
processors. It only is needed when the ACPI processor driver
actually attempts to handle them which doesn't happen before
loading the ACPI processor driver module. Therefore that call
should have been moved from acpi_processor_get_info() into that
module.
Address the problem by moving the request_region() call in question
out of acpi_processor_get_info() and use the observation that the
region reserved by it is only needed if the FADT-based CPU
throttling method is going to be used, which means that it should
be sufficient to invoke it from acpi_processor_get_throttling_fadt().
Fixes: ac212b6980 (ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure)
Reported-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Tested-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There is no need to carry potentially outdated Free Software Foundation
mailing address in file headers since the COPYING file includes it.
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
acpi_processor_set_throttling() uses set_cpus_allowed_ptr() to make
sure that the (struct acpi_processor)->acpi_processor_set_throttling()
callback will run on the right CPU. However, the function may be
called from a worker thread already bound to a different CPU in which
case that won't work.
Make acpi_processor_set_throttling() use work_on_cpu() as appropriate
instead of abusing set_cpus_allowed_ptr().
Reported-and-tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Replace direct inclusions of <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and
<acpi/acpi_drivers.h>, which are incorrect, with <linux/acpi.h>
inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't
necessary.
First of all, <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
should not be included directly from any files that are built for
CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about
undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds. For CONFIG_ACPI set,
<linux/acpi.h> includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it
provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case.
Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always
have to be met. Namely, it is required that <acpi/acpi_bus.h> be included
prior to <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the
latter depends on are always there. And <acpi/acpi.h> which provides
basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other
ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds. That also is taken care of including
<linux/acpi.h> as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (drivers/pci stuff)
Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (Xen stuff)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This patch fixes following compiler warnings when build via make W=1:
drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c: In function ‘acpi_processor_throttling_init’:
drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c:216:40: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘if’ statement [-Wempty-body]
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
