This converts some of the visually simpler cases that have been split
over multiple lines. I only did the ones that are easy to verify the
resulting diff by having just that final GFP_KERNEL argument on the next
line.
Somebody should probably do a proper coccinelle script for this, but for
me the trivial script actually resulted in an assertion failure in the
middle of the script. I probably had made it a bit _too_ trivial.
So after fighting that far a while I decided to just do some of the
syntactically simpler cases with variations of the previous 'sed'
scripts.
The more syntactically complex multi-line cases would mostly really want
whitespace cleanup anyway.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This is the result of running the Coccinelle script from
scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci. The script is designed to
avoid scalar types (which need careful case-by-case checking), and
instead replace kmalloc-family calls that allocate struct or union
object instances:
Single allocations: kmalloc(sizeof(TYPE), ...)
are replaced with: kmalloc_obj(TYPE, ...)
Array allocations: kmalloc_array(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE), ...)
are replaced with: kmalloc_objs(TYPE, COUNT, ...)
Flex array allocations: kmalloc(struct_size(PTR, FAM, COUNT), ...)
are replaced with: kmalloc_flex(*PTR, FAM, COUNT, ...)
(where TYPE may also be *VAR)
The resulting allocations no longer return "void *", instead returning
"TYPE *".
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Commit d33bd88ac0 ("ACPI: processor: perflib: Fix initial _PPC limit
application") added a pr->performance check that prevents the frequency
QoS request from being added when the given processor has no performance
object. Unfortunately, this causes a WARN() in freq_qos_remove_request()
to trigger on an attempt to take the given CPU offline later because the
frequency QoS object has not been added for it due to the missing
performance object.
Address this by moving the pr->performance check before calling
acpi_processor_get_platform_limit() so it only prevents a limit from
being set for the CPU if the performance object is not present. This
way, the frequency QoS request is added as it was before the above
commit and it is present all the time along with the CPU's cpufreq
policy regardless of whether or not the CPU is online.
Fixes: d33bd88ac0 ("ACPI: processor: perflib: Fix initial _PPC limit application")
Tested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2801421.mvXUDI8C0e@rafael.j.wysocki
If the BIOS sets a _PPC frequency limit upfront, it will fail to take
effect due to a call ordering issue. Namely, freq_qos_update_request()
is called before freq_qos_add_request() for the given request causing
the constraint update to be ignored. The call sequence in question is
as follows:
cpufreq_policy_online()
acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init()
acpi_processor_register_performance()
acpi_processor_get_performance_info()
acpi_processor_get_platform_limit()
freq_qos_update_request(&perflib_req) <- inactive QoS request
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY)
acpi_processor_notifier()
acpi_processor_ppc_init()
freq_qos_add_request(&perflib_req) <- QoS request activation
Address this by adding an acpi_processor_get_platform_limit() call
to acpi_processor_ppc_init(), after the perflib_req activation via
freq_qos_add_request(), which causes the initial _PPC limit to be
picked up as appropriate. However, also ensure that the _PPC limit
will not be picked up in the cases when the cpufreq driver does not
call acpi_processor_register_performance() by adding a pr->performance
check to the related_cpus loop in acpi_processor_ppc_init().
Fixes: d15ce41273 ("ACPI: cpufreq: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier")
Signed-off-by: Jiayi Li <lijiayi@kylinos.cn>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250721032606.3459369-1-lijiayi@kylinos.cn
[ rjw: Consolidate pr-related checks in acpi_processor_ppc_init() ]
[ rjw: Subject and changelog adjustments ]
Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+: 2d8b39a62a ACPI: processor: Avoid NULL pointer dereferences at init time
Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+: 3000ce3c52 cpufreq: Use per-policy frequency QoS
Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+: a1bb46c36c ACPI: processor: Add QoS requests for all CPUs
Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The majority of the processor_perflib code is only used by cpufreq
drivers on the x86 architecture and makes no sense without the
x86 SMI interactions that rely on I/O port access.
Replace the existing #ifdef checks with one that covers all of the
code that is only used by x86 drivers, saving a little bit
of kernel code size on other architectures.
There is likely more code under CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR that falls
into this category, but changing those would require a larger
rework.
Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241030123701.1538919-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Modify acpi_processor_get_platform_limit() to avoid updating its
frequency QoS request when the _PPC return value has not changed
by comparing that value to the previous _PPC return value stored in
the performance_platform_limit field of the struct acpi_processor
corresponding to the given CPU.
While at it, do the _PPC return value check against the state count
earlier, to avoid setting performance_platform_limit to an invalid
value, and make acpi_processor_ppc_init() use FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE
as the "no limit" frequency QoS for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
When _PPC returns 0, it means that the CPU frequency is not limited by
the platform firmware, so make acpi_processor_get_platform_limit()
update the frequency QoS request used by it to "no limit" in that case.
This addresses a problem with limiting CPU frequency artificially on
some systems after CPU offline/online to the frequency that corresponds
to the first entry in the _PSS return package.
Reported-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>
Tested-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>
Avoid returning a confusing error code from acpi_processor_notify_smm()
if it is called for the second time in the case when SMM notification
regarding P-state control is not supported.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Rearrange the code in acpi_processor_notify_smm() to consolidate error
handling in it and improve the comments in there while at it.
No expected functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Rearrange acpi_processor_unregister_performance() to follow a more
common error handling pattern and drop a redundant "return" statement
from the end of it.
No expected functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Drop some redundant parentheses and rearrange some checks using them
in the ACPI processor performance library code for better code clarity.
No expected functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Some inconsistent usage of white space in the ACPI processor performance
library code causes that code to be somewhat harder to read that it
would have been otherwise, so adjust the white space in there to
address that.
No expected functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The log messages in processor_perflib.c is not in consistency,
we have some printk() calls with PREFIX, but some are not; we
use pr_*() functions without prefix. So add pr_fmt() and unify
them with pr_*() functions.
While at it, fix some obvious coding style issues when going
through the functions.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* acpi-misc:
ACPI: dock: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations
ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue
ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: button: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: acpi_pad: add a missed blank line after declarations
ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations
ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function
ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue
ACPI: AC: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: fix various typos in comments
Quite a few users of ACPI objects want to log a warning message if
the evaluation fails which is a repeating pattern, so introduce a
helper function for that purpose and convert some code where it is
open-coded to using it.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
One of the "status != AE_NOT_FOUND" checks in
acpi_processor_get_platform_limit() is redundant,
so rearrange the code to eliminate it.
No functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() macros are used for
message printing in the ACPICA code and they should not be used
elsewhere. Special configuration (either kernel command line or
sysfs-based) is needed to see the messages printed by them and
the format of those messages is also special and convoluted.
For this reason, replace all of the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and
ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances in the ACPI processor driver with
corresponding dev_*(), acpi_handle_*() and pr_*() calls depending
on the context in which they appear.
Also drop the ACPI_PROCESSOR_COMPONENT definition that is not going
to be necessary any more.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Address the following checkpatch error:
ERROR: do not initialise statics to false
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Pull more power management updates from Rafael Wysocki:
"These update the CPPC cpufreq driver and intel_pstate (which involves
updating the cpufreq core and the schedutil governor) and make
janitorial changes in the ACPI code handling processor objects.
Specifics:
- Rework the passive-mode "fast switch" path in the intel_pstate
driver to allow it receive the minimum (required) and target
(desired) performance information from the schedutil governor so as
to avoid running some workloads too fast (Rafael Wysocki).
- Make the intel_pstate driver allow the policy max limit to be
increased after the guaranteed performance value for the given CPU
has increased (Rafael Wysocki).
- Clean up the handling of CPU coordination types in the CPPC cpufreq
driver and make it export frequency domains information to user
space via sysfs (Ionela Voinescu).
- Fix the ACPI code handling processor objects to use a correct
coordination type when it fails to map frequency domains and drop a
redundant CPU map initialization from it (Ionela Voinescu, Punit
Agrawal)"
* tag 'pm-5.11-rc1-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use most recent guaranteed performance values
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement the ->adjust_perf() callback
cpufreq: Add special-purpose fast-switching callback for drivers
cpufreq: schedutil: Add util to struct sg_cpu
cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu data array with a list
cppc_cpufreq: expose information on frequency domains
cppc_cpufreq: clarify support for coordination types
cppc_cpufreq: use policy->cpu as driver of frequency setting
ACPI: processor: fix NONE coordination for domain mapping failure
For errors parsing the _PSD domains, a separate domain is returned for
each CPU in the failed _PSD domain with no coordination (as per previous
comment). But contrary to the intention, the code was setting
CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ALL as coordination type.
Change shared_type to CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_NONE in case of errors parsing
the domain information. The function still returns the error and the caller
is free to bail out the domain initialisation altogether in that case.
Given that both functions return domains with a single CPU, this change
does not affect the functionality, but clarifies the intention.
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject edit ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* acpi-apei:
ACPI, APEI: make apei_resources_all static
* acpi-misc:
ACPI: acpi_drivers.h: Update the kernel doc
ACPI: acpi_drivers.h: Remove the leftover dead code
ACPI: tiny-power-button: Simplify the code using module_acpi_driver()
ACPI: SBS: Simplify the code using module_acpi_driver()
ACPI: SBS: Simplify the driver init code
ACPI: debug: Remove the not used function
ACPI: processor: Remove the duplicated ACPI_PROCESSOR_CLASS macro
* acpi-processor:
ACPI: processor: Drop duplicate setting of shared_cpu_map
'shared_cpu_map', stored as part of the per-processor
acpi_processor_performance structre, is used to store CPUs that share
a performance domain. By definition it contains the owning CPU.
While building the 'shared_cpu_map' it is being set twice - once while
initialising the performance domains and again when matching CPUs
belonging to the same domain.
Drop the unnecessary initialisation.
Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The ACPI_PROCESSOR_CLASS macro is defined in <acpi/processor.h>,
and ACPI drivers for processor already included <acpi/processor.h>,
so we can remove those duplicated ACPI_PROCESSOR_CLASS macros.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Linus Torvalds
Kees Cook
Rafael J. Wysocki
Jiayi LiandRafael J. Wysocki
Xin Li (Intel)andIngo Molnar
Arnd BergmannandRafael J. Wysocki
Hanjun GuoandRafael J. Wysocki
Tom SaegerandRafael J. Wysocki
Tian TaoandRafael J. Wysocki
Ionela VoinescuandRafael J. Wysocki
Punit AgrawalandRafael J. Wysocki