Several core ACPI device drivers set acpi_device_class() for the given
struct acpi_device to whatever they like, but that value is never used
unless the driver itself uses it and, sadly, they neglect to clear it on
remove. Since the only one of them still using acpi_device_class()
after previous changes is the button driver, update the others to stop
setting it in vain. Also drop the related device class sybmols that
become redundant.
Since the ACPI button driver continues to use acpi_device_class(), make
it clear the struct field represented by acpi_device_class() in its
remove callback.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3706295.iIbC2pHGDl@rafael.j.wysocki
Update several core ACPI device drivers that use
acpi_bus_generate_netlink_event() for generating netlink messages to
pass a string literal as its first argument instead of a pointer to
pnp.device_class in a given struct acpi_device, which will allow them
to avoid initializing the pnp.device_class field in the future.
The ACPI button driver that uses different acpi_device_class()
values for different button types will still pass it to
acpi_bus_generate_netlink_event(), but update it to use the
acpi_device_class() macro instead of open coding the pointer
access path.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/7944022.EvYhyI6sBW@rafael.j.wysocki
Commit 7a8c994cbb ("ACPI: processor: idle: Optimize ACPI idle
driver registration") moved the ACPI idle driver registration to
acpi_processor_driver_init() and acpi_processor_power_init() does
not register an idle driver any more.
Accordingly, the cpuidle driver check in __acpi_processor_start() needs
to be updated to avoid calling acpi_processor_power_init() without a
cpuidle driver, in which case the registration of the cpuidle device
in that function would lead to a NULL pointer dereference in
__cpuidle_register_device().
Fixes: 7a8c994cbb ("ACPI: processor: idle: Optimize ACPI idle driver registration")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251223100914.2407069-4-lihuisong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Currently, the ACPI idle driver is registered from within a CPU
hotplug callback. Although this didn't cause any functional issues,
this is questionable and confusing. And it is better to register
the cpuidle driver when all of the CPUs have been brought up.
So add a new function to initialize acpi_idle_driver based on the
power management information of an available CPU and register cpuidle
driver in acpi_processor_driver_init().
This commit has four changes under the commit 7a8c994cbb (ACPI:
processor: idle: Optimize ACPI idle driver registration):
1) move acpi_processor_register_idle_driver() ahead of the
driver_register().
2) add acpi_processor_cstate_first_run_checks() before calling
acpi_processor_get_power_info().
3) squash the commit 9d68320b2b (ACPI: processor: idle: Fix
function defined but not used warning) into this change.
4) use for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) to scan all possible cpus.
Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
[ rjw: New comment edits, changelog tweak ]
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251223100914.2407069-2-lihuisong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Revert commit 559f2eacc8 ACPI: processor: Do not expose global variable
acpi_idle_driver" because it depends on a problematic one.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit 7a8c994cbb ("ACPI: processor: idle: Optimize ACPI idle
driver registration") moved the ACPI idle driver registration to
acpi_processor_driver_init() and acpi_processor_power_init() does
not register an idle driver any more.
Accordingly, the cpuidle driver check in __acpi_processor_start() needs
to be updated to avoid calling acpi_processor_power_init() without a
cpuidle driver, in which case the registration of the cpuidle device
in that function would lead to a NULL pointer dereference in
__cpuidle_register_device().
Fixes: 7a8c994cbb ("ACPI: processor: idle: Optimize ACPI idle driver registration")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5044465.31r3eYUQgx@rafael.j.wysocki
[ rjw: Changelog update ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Currently, the ACPI idle driver is registered from within a CPU
hotplug callback. Although this didn't cause any functional issues,
this is questionable and confusing. And it is better to register
the cpuidle driver when all of the CPUs have been brought up.
So add a new function to initialize acpi_idle_driver based on the
power management information of an available CPU and register cpuidle
driver in acpi_processor_driver_init().
Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250728070612.1260859-3-lihuisong@huawei.com
[ rjw: Added missing inline modifiers ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Make acpi_processor_driver_init() call arch_cpu_rescan_dead_smt_siblings(),
via a new wrapper function called acpi_idle_rescan_dead_smt_siblings(),
after successfully initializing the driver, to allow the "dead" SMT
siblings to go into deep idle states, which is necessary for the
processor to be able to reach deep package C-states (like PC10) going
forward, so that power can be reduced sufficiently in suspend-to-idle,
among other things.
However, do it only if the ACPI idle driver is the current cpuidle
driver (otherwise it is assumed that another cpuidle driver will take
care of this) and avoid doing it on architectures other than x86.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2005721.PYKUYFuaPT@rjwysocki.net
arch_init_invariance_cppc() is called at the end of
acpi_cppc_processor_probe() in order to configure frequency invariance
based upon the values from _CPC.
This however doesn't work on AMD CPPC shared memory designs that have
AMD preferred cores enabled because _CPC needs to be analyzed from all
cores to judge if preferred cores are enabled.
This issue manifests to users as a warning since commit 21fb59ab4b
("ACPI: CPPC: Adjust debug messages in amd_set_max_freq_ratio() to warn"):
```
Could not retrieve highest performance (-19)
```
However the warning isn't the cause of this, it was actually
commit 279f838a61 ("x86/amd: Detect preferred cores in
amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator()") which exposed the issue.
To fix this problem, change arch_init_invariance_cppc() into a new weak
symbol that is called at the end of acpi_processor_driver_init().
Each architecture that supports it can declare the symbol to override
the weak one.
Define it for x86, in arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c, and for all of the
architectures using the generic arch_topology.c code.
Fixes: 279f838a61 ("x86/amd: Detect preferred cores in amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator()")
Reported-by: Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx@intelfx.name>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219431
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241104222855.3959267-1-superm1@kernel.org
[ rjw: Changelog edit ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Separate code paths, combined with a flag set in acpi_processor.c to
indicate a struct acpi_processor was for a hotplugged CPU ensured that
per CPU data was only set up the first time that a CPU was initialized.
This appears to be unnecessary as the paths can be combined by letting
the online logic also handle any CPUs online at the time of driver load.
Motivation for this change, beyond simplification, is that ARM64
virtual CPU HP uses the same code paths for hotplug and cold path in
acpi_processor.c so had no easy way to set the flag for hotplug only.
Removing this necessity will enable ARM64 vCPU HP to reuse the existing
code paths.
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240529133446.28446-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
The cpufreq policy notifier in the ACPI processor driver may as
well be registered before the driver itself, which causes
acpi_processor_cpufreq_init to be true (unless the notifier
registration fails, which is unlikely at that point) when the
ACPI CPU thermal cooling devices are registered, so the
processor_get_max_state() result does not change while
acpi_processor_driver_init() is running.
Change the ordering in acpi_processor_driver_init() accordingly
to prevent the max_state value from remaining 0 permanently for all
ACPI CPU cooling devices due to setting acpi_processor_cpufreq_init
too late. [Note that processor_get_max_state() may still return
different values at different times after this change, depending on
the cpufreq driver registration time, but that issue needs to be
addressed separately.]
Fixes: a365105c685c("thermal: sysfs: Reuse cdev->max_state")
Reported-by: Wang, Quanxian <quanxian.wang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/53ec1f06f61c984100868926f282647e57ecfb2d.camel@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Commit 239708a3af ("ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor
driver"), moves processor thermal registration to acpi_pss_perf_init(),
which doesn't get executed if ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS is not enabled.
As ARM64 supports P-states using CPPC, it should be possible to also
support processor passive cooling even if PSS is not enabled. Split
out the processor thermal cooling register from ACPI PSS to support
this, and move it into a separate function in processor_thermal.c.
Signed-off-by: Riwen Lu <luriwen@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com>
[ rjw: Subject edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() macros are used for
message printing in the ACPICA code and they should not be used
elsewhere. Special configuration (either kernel command line or
sysfs-based) is needed to see the messages printed by them and
the format of those messages is also special and convoluted.
For this reason, replace all of the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and
ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances in the ACPI processor driver with
corresponding dev_*(), acpi_handle_*() and pr_*() calls depending
on the context in which they appear.
Also drop the ACPI_PROCESSOR_COMPONENT definition that is not going
to be necessary any more.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Replace the CPU device PM QoS used for the management of min and max
frequency constraints in cpufreq (and its users) with per-policy
frequency QoS to avoid problems with cpufreq policies covering
more then one CPU.
Namely, a cpufreq driver is registered with the subsys interface
which calls cpufreq_add_dev() for each CPU, starting from CPU0, so
currently the PM QoS notifiers are added to the first CPU in the
policy (i.e. CPU0 in the majority of cases).
In turn, when the cpufreq driver is unregistered, the subsys interface
doing that calls cpufreq_remove_dev() for each CPU, starting from CPU0,
and the PM QoS notifiers are only removed when cpufreq_remove_dev() is
called for the last CPU in the policy, say CPUx, which as a rule is
not CPU0 if the policy covers more than one CPU. Then, the PM QoS
notifiers cannot be removed, because CPUx does not have them, and
they are still there in the device PM QoS notifiers list of CPU0,
which prevents new PM QoS notifiers from being registered for CPU0
on the next attempt to register the cpufreq driver.
The same issue occurs when the first CPU in the policy goes offline
before unregistering the driver.
After this change it does not matter which CPU is the policy CPU at
the driver registration time and whether or not it is online all the
time, because the frequency QoS is per policy and not per CPU.
Fixes: 67d874c3b2 ("cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework")
Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Diagnosed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/5ad2624194baa2f53acc1f1e627eb7684c577a19.1562210705.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/T/#md2d89e95906b8c91c15f582146173dce2e86e99f
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20191017094612.6tbkwoq4harsjcqv@vireshk-i7/T/#m30d48cc23b9a80467fbaa16e30f90b3828a5a29b
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
The cpufreq core now takes the min/max frequency constraints via QoS
requests and the CPUFREQ_ADJUST notifier shall get removed later on.
Switch over to using the QoS request for maximum frequency constraint
for acpi driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Based on 3 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version this program is distributed in the
hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even
the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular
purpose see the gnu general public license for more details
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version [author] [kishon] [vijay] [abraham]
[i] [kishon]@[ti] [com] this program is distributed in the hope that
it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see
the gnu general public license for more details
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version [author] [graeme] [gregory]
[gg]@[slimlogic] [co] [uk] [author] [kishon] [vijay] [abraham] [i]
[kishon]@[ti] [com] [based] [on] [twl6030]_[usb] [c] [author] [hema]
[hk] [hemahk]@[ti] [com] this program is distributed in the hope
that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the
implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular
purpose see the gnu general public license for more details
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-or-later
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 1105 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070033.202006027@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
_CPC is a optinal object for processor device so it's
fine for processor devices in DSDT without CPPC data,
but when booting the system with CPPC enabled in the
kernel but without its support in the firmware, I got
lots of warnings on a 64 core system:
[ 6.346016] acpi ACPI0007:00: CPPC data invalid or not present
[ 6.346028] acpi ACPI0007:01: CPPC data invalid or not present
[ 6.346039] acpi ACPI0007:02: CPPC data invalid or not present
[ 6.346050] acpi ACPI0007:03: CPPC data invalid or not present
[ 6.346063] acpi ACPI0007:04: CPPC data invalid or not present
...
[ 6.346737] acpi ACPI0007:3f: CPPC data invalid or not present
This isn't much useful and a little bit noise, so
switch the dev_warn() to dev_dbg().
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Converting the hotplug locking, i.e. get_online_cpus(), to a percpu rwsem
unearthed a circular lock dependency which was hidden from lockdep due to
the lockdep annotation of get_online_cpus() which prevents lockdep from
creating full dependency chains.
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock((&wfc.work));
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem);
lock((&wfc.work));
lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem);
This dependency is established via acpi_processor_start() which calls into
the work queue code. And the work queue code establishes the reverse
dependency.
This is not a problem of get_online_cpus() recursion, it's a possible
deadlock undetected by lockdep so far.
The cure is to use cpu_hotplug_disable() instead of get_online_cpus() to
protect the probing from acpi_processor_start().
There is a side effect to this: cpu_hotplug_disable() makes a concurrent
cpu hotplug attempt via the sysfs interfaces fail with -EBUSY, but that
probing usually happens during the boot process where no interaction is
possible. Any later invocations are infrequent enough and concurrent
hotplug attempts are so unlikely that the danger of user space visible
regressions is very close to zero. Anyway, thats preferrable over a real
deadlock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170524081548.851588594@linutronix.de
acpi_processor_get_throttling() requires to invoke the getter function on
the target CPU. This is achieved by temporarily setting the affinity of the
calling user space thread to the requested CPU and reset it to the original
affinity afterwards.
That's racy vs. CPU hotplug and concurrent affinity settings for that
thread resulting in code executing on the wrong CPU and overwriting the
new affinity setting.
acpi_processor_get_throttling() is invoked in two ways:
1) The CPU online callback, which is already running on the target CPU and
obviously protected against hotplug and not affected by affinity
settings.
2) The ACPI driver probe function, which is not protected against hotplug
during modprobe.
Switch it over to work_on_cpu() and protect the probe function against CPU
hotplug.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170412201042.785920903@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
