From d8966ca88566d94de9958a84f93bd08bfc431ee6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zhan Xusheng Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 16:45:56 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] hrtimer: Remove unused next_timer argument from __hrtimer_reprogram() __hrtimer_reprogram() takes a @next_timer argument but never references it; it only stores @expires_next into cpu_base->expires_next and reprograms the clock event device. The argument has been unused since commit b14bca97c9f5 ("hrtimer: Consolidate reprogramming code"). Drop it and update the two callers. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260706084557.3845091-2-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com --- kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c index 2a278ae550a1..9c320ab7a944 100644 --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c @@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ static inline void hrtimer_rearm_event(ktime_t expires_next, bool deferred) tick_program_event(expires_next, 1); } -static void __hrtimer_reprogram(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base, struct hrtimer *next_timer, +static void __hrtimer_reprogram(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base, ktime_t expires_next) { cpu_base->expires_next = expires_next; @@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ static void hrtimer_force_reprogram(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base, bool skip if (skip_equal && expires_next == cpu_base->expires_next) return; - __hrtimer_reprogram(cpu_base, cpu_base->next_timer, expires_next); + __hrtimer_reprogram(cpu_base, expires_next); } /* High resolution timer related functions */ @@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ static void hrtimer_reprogram(struct hrtimer *timer, bool reprogram) cpu_base->next_timer = timer; - __hrtimer_reprogram(cpu_base, timer, expires); + __hrtimer_reprogram(cpu_base, expires); } static bool update_needs_ipi(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base, unsigned int active)