Pull power management updates from Rafael Wysocki:
"These include a significant update of the generic power domains
(genpd) and Operating Performance Points (OPP) frameworks, mostly
related to the introduction of power domain performance levels,
cpufreq updates (new driver for Qualcomm Kryo processors, updates of
the existing drivers, some core fixes, schedutil governor
improvements), PCI power management fixes, ACPI workaround for
EC-based wakeup events handling on resume from suspend-to-idle, and
major updates of the turbostat and pm-graph utilities.
Specifics:
- Introduce power domain performance levels into the the generic
power domains (genpd) and Operating Performance Points (OPP)
frameworks (Viresh Kumar, Rajendra Nayak, Dan Carpenter).
- Fix two issues in the runtime PM framework related to the
initialization and removal of devices using device links (Ulf
Hansson).
- Clean up the initialization of drivers for devices in PM domains
(Ulf Hansson, Geert Uytterhoeven).
- Fix a cpufreq core issue related to the policy sysfs interface
causing CPU online to fail for CPUs sharing one cpufreq policy in
some situations (Tao Wang).
- Make it possible to use platform-specific suspend/resume hooks in
the cpufreq-dt driver and make the Armada 37xx DVFS use that
feature (Viresh Kumar, Miquel Raynal).
- Optimize policy transition notifications in cpufreq (Viresh Kumar).
- Improve the iowait boost mechanism in the schedutil cpufreq
governor (Patrick Bellasi).
- Improve the handling of deferred frequency updates in the schedutil
cpufreq governor (Joel Fernandes, Dietmar Eggemann, Rafael Wysocki,
Viresh Kumar).
- Add a new cpufreq driver for Qualcomm Kryo (Ilia Lin).
- Fix and clean up some cpufreq drivers (Colin Ian King, Dmitry
Osipenko, Doug Smythies, Luc Van Oostenryck, Simon Horman, Viresh
Kumar).
- Fix the handling of PCI devices with the DPM_SMART_SUSPEND flag set
and update stale comments in the PCI core PM code (Rafael Wysocki).
- Work around an issue related to the handling of EC-based wakeup
events in the ACPI PM core during resume from suspend-to-idle if
the EC has been put into the low-power mode (Rafael Wysocki).
- Improve the handling of wakeup source objects in the PM core (Doug
Berger, Mahendran Ganesh, Rafael Wysocki).
- Update the driver core to prevent deferred probe from breaking
suspend/resume ordering (Feng Kan).
- Clean up the PM core somewhat (Bjorn Helgaas, Ulf Hansson, Rafael
Wysocki).
- Make the core suspend/resume code and cpufreq support the RT patch
(Sebastian Andrzej Siewior, Thomas Gleixner).
- Consolidate the PM QoS handling in cpuidle governors (Rafael
Wysocki).
- Fix a possible crash in the hibernation core (Tetsuo Handa).
- Update the rockchip-io Adaptive Voltage Scaling (AVS) driver (David
Wu).
- Update the turbostat utility (fixes, cleanups, new CPU IDs, new
command line options, built-in "Low Power Idle" counters support,
new POLL and POLL% columns) and add an entry for it to MAINTAINERS
(Len Brown, Artem Bityutskiy, Chen Yu, Laura Abbott, Matt Turner,
Prarit Bhargava, Srinivas Pandruvada).
- Update the pm-graph to version 5.1 (Todd Brandt).
- Update the intel_pstate_tracer utility (Doug Smythies)"
* tag 'pm-4.18-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: (128 commits)
tools/power turbostat: update version number
tools/power turbostat: Add Node in output
tools/power turbostat: add node information into turbostat calculations
tools/power turbostat: remove num_ from cpu_topology struct
tools/power turbostat: rename num_cores_per_pkg to num_cores_per_node
tools/power turbostat: track thread ID in cpu_topology
tools/power turbostat: Calculate additional node information for a package
tools/power turbostat: Fix node and siblings lookup data
tools/power turbostat: set max_num_cpus equal to the cpumask length
tools/power turbostat: if --num_iterations, print for specific number of iterations
tools/power turbostat: Add Cannon Lake support
tools/power turbostat: delete duplicate #defines
x86: msr-index.h: Correct SNB_C1/C3_AUTO_UNDEMOTE defines
tools/power turbostat: Correct SNB_C1/C3_AUTO_UNDEMOTE defines
tools/power turbostat: add POLL and POLL% column
tools/power turbostat: Fix --hide Pk%pc10
tools/power turbostat: Build-in "Low Power Idle" counters support
tools/power turbostat: Don't make man pages executable
tools/power turbostat: remove blank lines
tools/power turbostat: a small C-states dump readability immprovement
...
Pull scheduler updates from Ingo Molnar:
- power-aware scheduling improvements (Patrick Bellasi)
- NUMA balancing improvements (Mel Gorman)
- vCPU scheduling fixes (Rohit Jain)
* 'sched-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
sched/fair: Update util_est before updating schedutil
sched/cpufreq: Modify aggregate utilization to always include blocked FAIR utilization
sched/deadline/Documentation: Add overrun signal and GRUB-PA documentation
sched/core: Distinguish between idle_cpu() calls based on desired effect, introduce available_idle_cpu()
sched/wait: Include <linux/wait.h> in <linux/swait.h>
sched/numa: Stagger NUMA balancing scan periods for new threads
sched/core: Don't schedule threads on pre-empted vCPUs
sched/fair: Avoid calling sync_entity_load_avg() unnecessarily
sched/fair: Rearrange select_task_rq_fair() to optimize it
Pull RCU updates from Ingo Molnar:
- updates to the handling of expedited grace periods
- updates to reduce lock contention in the rcu_node combining tree
[ These are in preparation for the consolidation of RCU-bh,
RCU-preempt, and RCU-sched into a single flavor, which was
requested by Linus in response to a security flaw whose root cause
included confusion between the multiple flavors of RCU ]
- torture-test updates that save their users some time and effort
- miscellaneous fixes
* 'core-rcu-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (44 commits)
rcu/x86: Provide early rcu_cpu_starting() callback
torture: Make kvm-find-errors.sh find build warnings
rcutorture: Abbreviate kvm.sh summary lines
rcutorture: Print end-of-test state in kvm.sh summary
rcutorture: Print end-of-test state
torture: Fold parse-torture.sh into parse-console.sh
torture: Add a script to edit output from failed runs
rcu: Update list of rcu_future_grace_period() trace events
rcu: Drop early GP request check from rcu_gp_kthread()
rcu: Simplify and inline cpu_needs_another_gp()
rcu: The rcu_gp_cleanup() function does not need cpu_needs_another_gp()
rcu: Make rcu_start_this_gp() check for out-of-range requests
rcu: Add funnel locking to rcu_start_this_gp()
rcu: Make rcu_start_future_gp() caller select grace period
rcu: Inline rcu_start_gp_advanced() into rcu_start_future_gp()
rcu: Clear request other than RCU_GP_FLAG_INIT at GP end
rcu: Cleanup, don't put ->completed into an int
rcu: Switch __rcu_process_callbacks() to rcu_accelerate_cbs()
rcu: Avoid __call_rcu_core() root rcu_node ->lock acquisition
rcu: Make rcu_migrate_callbacks wake GP kthread when needed
...
A missing clock update is causing the following warning:
rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP
WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 0 at kernel/sched/sched.h:963 inactive_task_timer+0x5d6/0x720
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__hrtimer_run_queues+0x10f/0x530
hrtimer_interrupt+0xe5/0x240
smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x79/0x2b0
apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20
</IRQ>
do_idle+0x203/0x280
cpu_startup_entry+0x6f/0x80
start_secondary+0x1b0/0x200
secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0
hardirqs last enabled at (793919): [<ffffffffa27c5f6e>] cpuidle_enter_state+0x9e/0x360
hardirqs last disabled at (793920): [<ffffffffa2a0096e>] interrupt_entry+0xce/0xe0
softirqs last enabled at (793922): [<ffffffffa20bef78>] irq_enter+0x68/0x70
softirqs last disabled at (793921): [<ffffffffa20bef5d>] irq_enter+0x4d/0x70
This happens because inactive_task_timer() calls sub_running_bw() (if
TASK_DEAD and non_contending) that might trigger a schedutil update,
which might access the clock. Clock is however currently updated only
later in inactive_task_timer() function.
Fix the problem by updating the clock right after task_rq_lock().
Reported-by: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180530160809.9074-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
select_task_rq() is used in a few paths to select the CPU upon which a
thread should be run - for example it is used by try_to_wake_up() & by
fork or exec balancing. As-is it allows use of any online CPU that is
present in the task's cpus_allowed mask.
This presents a problem because there is a period whilst CPUs are
brought online where a CPU is marked online, but is not yet fully
initialized - ie. the period where CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE <= state <
CPUHP_ONLINE. Usually we don't run any user tasks during this window,
but there are corner cases where this can happen. An example observed
is:
- Some user task A, running on CPU X, forks to create task B.
- sched_fork() calls __set_task_cpu() with cpu=X, setting task B's
task_struct::cpu field to X.
- CPU X is offlined.
- Task A, currently somewhere between the __set_task_cpu() in
copy_process() and the call to wake_up_new_task(), is migrated to
CPU Y by migrate_tasks() when CPU X is offlined.
- CPU X is onlined, but still in the CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE state. The
scheduler is now active on CPU X, but there are no user tasks on
the runqueue.
- Task A runs on CPU Y & reaches wake_up_new_task(). This calls
select_task_rq() with cpu=X, taken from task B's task_struct,
and select_task_rq() allows CPU X to be returned.
- Task A enqueues task B on CPU X's runqueue, via activate_task() &
enqueue_task().
- CPU X now has a user task on its runqueue before it has reached the
CPUHP_ONLINE state.
In most cases, the user tasks that schedule on the newly onlined CPU
have no idea that anything went wrong, but one case observed to be
problematic is if the task goes on to invoke the sched_setaffinity
syscall. The newly onlined CPU reaches the CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE state
before the CPU that brought it online calls stop_machine_unpark(). This
means that for a portion of the window of time between
CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE & CPUHP_ONLINE the newly onlined CPU's struct
cpu_stopper has its enabled field set to false. If a user thread is
executed on the CPU during this window and it invokes sched_setaffinity
with a CPU mask that does not include the CPU it's running on, then when
__set_cpus_allowed_ptr() calls stop_one_cpu() intending to invoke
migration_cpu_stop() and perform the actual migration away from the CPU
it will simply return -ENOENT rather than calling migration_cpu_stop().
We then return from the sched_setaffinity syscall back to the user task
that is now running on a CPU which it just asked not to run on, and
which is not present in its cpus_allowed mask.
This patch resolves the problem by having select_task_rq() enforce that
user tasks run on CPUs that are active - the same requirement that
select_fallback_rq() already enforces. This should ensure that newly
onlined CPUs reach the CPUHP_AP_ACTIVE state before being able to
schedule user tasks, and also implies that bringup_wait_for_ap() will
have called stop_machine_unpark() which resolves the sched_setaffinity
issue above.
I haven't yet investigated them, but it may be of interest to review
whether any of the actions performed by hotplug states between
CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE & CPUHP_AP_ACTIVE could have similar unintended
effects on user tasks that might schedule before they are reached, which
might widen the scope of the problem from just affecting the behaviour
of sched_setaffinity.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180526154648.11635-2-paul.burton@mips.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Commit 152db033d7 (schedutil: Allow cpufreq requests to be made
even when kthread kicked) made changes to prevent utilization updates
from being discarded during processing a previous request, but it
left a small window in which that still can happen in the one-CPU
policy case. Namely, updates coming in after setting work_in_progress
in sugov_update_commit() and clearing it in sugov_work() will still
be dropped due to the work_in_progress check in sugov_update_single().
To close that window, rearrange the code so as to acquire the update
lock around the deferred update branch in sugov_update_single()
and drop the work_in_progress check from it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Currently there is a chance of a schedutil cpufreq update request to be
dropped if there is a pending update request. This pending request can
be delayed if there is a scheduling delay of the irq_work and the wake
up of the schedutil governor kthread.
A very bad scenario is when a schedutil request was already just made,
such as to reduce the CPU frequency, then a newer request to increase
CPU frequency (even sched deadline urgent frequency increase requests)
can be dropped, even though the rate limits suggest that its Ok to
process a request. This is because of the way the work_in_progress flag
is used.
This patch improves the situation by allowing new requests to happen
even though the old one is still being processed. Note that in this
approach, if an irq_work was already issued, we just update next_freq
and don't bother to queue another request so there's no extra work being
done to make this happen.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This routine checks if the CPU running this code belongs to the policy
of the target CPU or if not, can it do remote DVFS for it remotely. But
the current name of it implies as if it is only about doing remote
updates.
Rename it to make it more relevant.
Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The iowait boosting code has been recently updated to add a progressive
boosting behavior which allows to be less aggressive in boosting tasks
doing only sporadic IO operations, thus being more energy efficient for
example on mobile platforms.
The current code is now however a bit convoluted. Some functionalities
(e.g. iowait boost reset) are replicated in different paths and their
documentation is slightly misaligned.
Let's cleanup the code by consolidating all the IO wait boosting related
functionality within within few dedicated functions and better define
their role:
- sugov_iowait_boost: set/increase the IO wait boost of a CPU
- sugov_iowait_apply: apply/reduce the IO wait boost of a CPU
Both these two function are used at every sugov update and they make
use of a unified IO wait boost reset policy provided by:
- sugov_iowait_reset: reset/disable the IO wait boost of a CPU
if a CPU is not updated for more then one tick
This makes possible a cleaner and more self-contained design for the IO
wait boosting code since the rest of the sugov update routines, both for
single and shared frequency domains, follow the same template:
/* Configure IO boost, if required */
sugov_iowait_boost()
/* Return here if freq change is in progress or throttled */
/* Collect and aggregate utilization information */
sugov_get_util()
sugov_aggregate_util()
/*
* Add IO boost, if currently enabled, on top of the aggregated
* utilization value
*/
sugov_iowait_apply()
As a extra bonus, let's also add the documentation for the new
functions and better align the in-code documentation.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
A more energy efficient update of the IO wait boosting mechanism has
been introduced in:
commit a5a0809bc5 ("cpufreq: schedutil: Make iowait boost more energy efficient")
where the boost value is expected to be:
- doubled at each successive wakeup from IO
staring from the minimum frequency supported by a CPU
- reset when a CPU is not updated for more then one tick
by either disabling the IO wait boost or resetting its value to the
minimum frequency if this new update requires an IO boost.
This approach is supposed to "ignore" boosting for sporadic wakeups from
IO, while still getting the frequency boosted to the maximum to benefit
long sequence of wakeup from IO operations.
However, these assumptions are not always satisfied.
For example, when an IO boosted CPU enters idle for more the one tick
and then wakes up after an IO wait, since in sugov_set_iowait_boost() we
first check the IOWAIT flag, we keep doubling the iowait boost instead
of restarting from the minimum frequency value.
This misbehavior could happen mainly on non-shared frequency domains,
thus defeating the energy efficiency optimization, but it can also
happen on shared frequency domain systems.
Let fix this issue in sugov_set_iowait_boost() by:
- first check the IO wait boost reset conditions
to eventually reset the boost value
- then applying the correct IO boost value
if required by the caller
Fixes: a5a0809bc5 (cpufreq: schedutil: Make iowait boost more energy efficient)
Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In the following commit:
6b55c9654f ("sched/debug: Move print_cfs_rq() declaration to kernel/sched/sched.h")
the print_cfs_rq() prototype was added to <kernel/sched/sched.h>,
right next to the prototypes for print_cfs_stats(), print_rt_stats()
and print_dl_stats().
Finish this previous commit and also move related prototypes for
print_rt_rq() and print_dl_rq().
Remove existing extern declarations now that they not needed anymore.
Silences the following GCC warning, triggered by W=1:
kernel/sched/debug.c:573:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘print_rt_rq’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
kernel/sched/debug.c:603:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘print_dl_rq’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180516195348.30426-1-malat@debian.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
- Updates to the handling of expedited grace periods, perhaps most
notably parallelizing their initialization. Other changes
include fixes from Boqun Feng.
- Miscellaneous fixes. These include an nvme fix from Nitzan Carmi
that I am carrying because it depends on a new SRCU function
cleanup_srcu_struct_quiesced(). This branch also includes fixes
from Byungchul Park and Yury Norov.
- Updates to reduce lock contention in the rcu_node combining tree.
These are in preparation for the consolidation of RCU-bh,
RCU-preempt, and RCU-sched into a single flavor, which was
requested by Linus Torvalds in response to a security flaw
whose root cause included confusion between the multiple flavors
of RCU.
- Torture-test updates that save their users some time and effort.
Conflicts:
drivers/nvme/host/core.c
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Variants of proc_create{,_data} that directly take a struct seq_operations
argument and drastically reduces the boilerplate code in the callers.
All trivial callers converted over.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
The schedutil driver sets sg_policy->next_freq to UINT_MAX on certain
occasions to discard the cached value of next freq:
- In sugov_start(), when the schedutil governor is started for a group
of CPUs.
- And whenever we need to force a freq update before rate-limit
duration, which happens when:
- there is an update in cpufreq policy limits.
- Or when the utilization of DL scheduling class increases.
In return, get_next_freq() doesn't return a cached next_freq value but
recalculates the next frequency instead.
But having special meaning for a particular value of frequency makes the
code less readable and error prone. We recently fixed a bug where the
UINT_MAX value was considered as valid frequency in
sugov_update_single().
All we need is a flag which can be used to discard the value of
sg_policy->next_freq and we already have need_freq_update for that. Lets
reuse it instead of setting next_freq to UINT_MAX.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This reverts commit e2cabe48c2.
Lifting the restriction that the sugov kthread is bound to the
policy->related_cpus for a system with a slow switching cpufreq driver,
which is able to perform DVFS from any cpu (e.g. cpufreq-dt), is not
only not beneficial it also harms Enery-Aware Scheduling (EAS) on
systems with asymmetric cpu capacities (e.g. Arm big.LITTLE).
The sugov kthread which does the update for the little cpus could
potentially run on a big cpu. It could prevent that the big cluster goes
into deeper idle states although all the tasks are running on the little
cluster.
Example: hikey960 w/ 4.16.0-rc6-+
Arm big.LITTLE with per-cluster DVFS
root@h960:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "^CPU part"
CPU part : 0xd03 (Cortex-A53, little cpu)
CPU part : 0xd03
CPU part : 0xd03
CPU part : 0xd03
CPU part : 0xd09 (Cortex-A73, big cpu)
CPU part : 0xd09
CPU part : 0xd09
CPU part : 0xd09
root@h960:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq# ls
policy0 policy4 schedutil
root@h960:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq# cat policy*/related_cpus
0 1 2 3
4 5 6 7
(1) w/o the revert:
root@h960:~# ps -eo pid,class,rtprio,pri,psr,comm | awk 'NR == 1 ||
/sugov/'
PID CLS RTPRIO PRI PSR COMMAND
1489 #6 0 140 1 sugov:0
1490 #6 0 140 0 sugov:4
The sugov kthread sugov:4 responsible for policy4 runs on cpu0. (In this
case both sugov kthreads run on little cpus).
cross policy (cluster) remote callback example:
...
migration/1-14 [001] enqueue_task_fair: this_cpu=1 cpu_of(rq)=5
migration/1-14 [001] sugov_update_shared: this_cpu=1 sg_cpu->cpu=5
sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->related_cpus=4-7
sugov:4-1490 [000] sugov_work: this_cpu=0
sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->related_cpus=4-7
...
The remote callback (this_cpu=1, target_cpu=5) is executed on cpu=0.
(2) w/ the revert:
root@h960:~# ps -eo pid,class,rtprio,pri,psr,comm | awk 'NR == 1 ||
/sugov/'
PID CLS RTPRIO PRI PSR COMMAND
1491 #6 0 140 2 sugov:0
1492 #6 0 140 4 sugov:4
The sugov kthread sugov:4 responsible for policy4 runs on cpu4.
cross policy (cluster) remote callback example:
...
migration/1-14 [001] enqueue_task_fair: this_cpu=1 cpu_of(rq)=7
migration/1-14 [001] sugov_update_shared: this_cpu=1 sg_cpu->cpu=7
sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->related_cpus=4-7
sugov:4-1492 [004] sugov_work: this_cpu=4
sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->related_cpus=4-7
...
The remote callback (this_cpu=1, target_cpu=7) is executed on cpu=4.
Now the sugov kthread executes again on the policy (cluster) for which
the Operating Performance Point (OPP) should be changed.
It avoids the problem that an otherwise idle policy (cluster) is running
schedutil (the sugov kthread) for another one.
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>