Lenovo X250 has a PnpID of LEN0046, but it does not have the top software
button requirement.
For the record, Lenovo T450s and W541 have a PnpID of LEN200f and LEN004a,
so they are not on the top software button list.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martin <consume.noise@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Lenovo decided to switch back to physical buttons for the trackstick on
their latest series. The PNPId list was provided before they reverted back
to physical buttons, so it contains the new models too. We can know from
the touchpad capabilities that the touchpad has physical buttons, so
removing the ids from the list is not mandatory. It is still nicer to
remove the wrong ids, so start by removing the X1 Carbon 3rd gen, with the
PNPId of LEN0048.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The 2015 series of the Lenovo thinkpads added back the hardware buttons on
top of the touchpad for the trackstick.
Unfortunately, they are wired to the touchpad, and not the trackstick.
Thus, they are seen as extra buttons from the kernel point of view.
This leads to a problem in user space because extra buttons on synaptics
devices used to be used as scroll up/down buttons. So in the end, the
experience for the user is scroll events for buttons left and right when
using the trackstick. Yay!
Fortunately, the firmware advertises such behavior in the extended
capability $10, and so we can re-route the buttons through the pass-through
interface.
Hallelujah-expressed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The 2015 series of the Lenovo thinkpads added back the hardware buttons on
top of the touchpad for the trackstick.
Unfortunately, Lenovo used the PNPIDs that are supposed to be "5 buttons"
touchpads, so the new laptops also have the INPUT_PROP_TOPBUTTONPAD. Yay!
Instead of manually removing each of the new ones, or hoping that we know
all the current ones, we can consider that the PNPIDs list that were given
contains touchpads that have the trackstick buttons, either physically
wired to them, or emulated with the top software button property.
Thanks to the extra buttons capability in query $10, we can reliably detect
the physical buttons from the software ones, and so we can remove the
TOPBUTTONPAD property even if it was declared as such.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
On the X1 Carbon 3rd gen (with a 2015 broadwell cpu), the physical middle
button of the trackstick (attached to the touchpad serio device, of course)
seems to get lost.
Actually, the touchpads reports 3 extra buttons, which falls in the switch
below to the '2' case. Let's handle the case of odd numbers also, so that
the middle button finds its way back.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Post-2013 Lenovo laptops provide correct min/max dimensions, which are
different with the ones currently quirked. According to
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91541 the following board ids
are assigned in the post-2013 touchpads:
t440p/t440s: LEN0036 -> 2964/2962
t540p: LEN0034 -> 2964
Using 2961 as the common minimum makes these 3 laptops OK. We may need
to update those values later if other pnp_ids has a lower board_id.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Split the function synaptics_resolution() into synaptics_resolution() and
synaptics_quirks(). synaptics_resolution() will be called before
synaptics_quirks() to query dimensions and resolutions before overwriting
them with quirks.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Martin <consume.noise@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
According to Synaptics devices with ForcePads use SYN300D and SYN3014 as
PNP IDs, so let's switch from DMI-bases detection scheme to PNP-based
one, which should be more reliable.
Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of having various protocols provide <protocol>_supported()
functions, let's use IS_ENABLED() macro that works well in "if" statements.
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
When tapping a clickpad with two fingers, there is a chance that the sensor
sees first only one finger, and at the next scan only the second one. In
this case, the sensors says that there has been only one finger on the
clickpad, which moved really fast between two scans.
We can try to counter this by adding a limit to what an actual finger can
move between 2 scans. A distance of 1cm between two scans for one finger
seems reasonable. However, this is not really accurate because the
resolution in X and in Y differs. But heh, that's how the in-kernel
tracking works right now, and its job is quite good, even with this
approximation.
This parameter solves most of the jumps observed, not all of them however.
But this is a hardware defect, and we might not be able to get something
better without much heavier computations.
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76722
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Some devices are not fast enough to differentiate between a fast-moving
contact and a new contact. This problem cannot be fully resolved because
information is truly missing, but it is possible to safe-guard against
obvious mistakes by restricting movement with a maximum displacement.
The new problem formulation for dmax > 0 cannot benefit from the speedup
for positive definite matrices, but since the convergence is faster, the
result is about the same. For a handful of contacts, the latency difference
is truly negligible.
Suggested-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@bitmath.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
synaptics_profile_sensor_process() and synaptics_report_mt_data() now
share the exact same code. Remove one implementation and rely on the
other where it was used.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The current code tries to consider all states and transitions to properly
detect which finger is attached to which slot. The code is quite huge
and difficult to read.
If the sensor manages to group the touch points but is not reliable in
giving tracking ids, we can simply use the kernel tracking method. Note
that it is already used by Cr-48 Chromebooks.
Incidentaly, this fixes a bug reported by Peter Hutterer:
"""
on the Lenovo T440, run:
evemu-record /dev/input/event4 | grep BTN_
then put one, two, three, two fingers down
when you go from 3 to 2 fingers the driver sends a spurious BTN_TOUCH 0
event:
E: 0.000000 0001 014a 0001 # EV_KEY / BTN_TOUCH 1
E: 0.000000 0001 0145 0001 # EV_KEY / BTN_TOOL_FINGER 1
E: 0.770008 0001 0145 0000 # EV_KEY / BTN_TOOL_FINGER 0
E: 0.770008 0001 014d 0001 # EV_KEY / BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP 1
E: 1.924716 0001 014d 0000 # EV_KEY / BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP 0
E: 1.924716 0001 014e 0001 # EV_KEY / BTN_TOOL_TRIPLETAP 1
.. changing from 3 to 2 fingers now
E: 3.152641 0001 014a 0000 # EV_KEY / BTN_TOUCH 0
E: 3.152641 0001 014d 0001 # EV_KEY / BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP 1
E: 3.152641 0001 014e 0000 # EV_KEY / BTN_TOOL_TRIPLETAP 0
E: 3.176948 0001 014a 0001 # EV_KEY / BTN_TOUCH 1
quick look in the kernel shows it's caused by hw.z going to 0 for a packet,
so probably a firmware bug. either way, it makes it hard to track BTN_TOUCH
as signal that at least one finger is down.
"""
The in-kernel tracking is enough to remove this spurious BTN_TOUCH 0.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The LEN2006 Synaptics touchpad (as found in Thinkpad E540) returns wrong
min max values.
touchpad-edge-detector output:
> Touchpad SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad on /dev/input/event6
> Move one finger around the touchpad to detect the actual edges
> Kernel says: x [1472..5674], y [1408..4684]
> Touchpad sends: x [1264..5675], y [1171..4688]
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88211
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Binyamin Sagal <bensagal@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Benjamin Tissoires
Dmitry Torokhov
Daniel Martin
Daniel Martin
Henrik Rydberg
Peter Hutterer
Ben Sagal
Takashi Iwai