In recent Intel hardware the IRQs become non-configurable after BIOS
initializes them in PEI phase and _PRS objects are no longer included in
ASL.
This is the same as "static (non-configurable) devices do not
specify a _PRS object" in ACPI spec. As a result, error messages
saying "ACPI Exception: AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _PRS" does not need to
be in kernel messenges all the time but only when debug is enabled, and
acpi_pci_link_get_possible should not return -ENODEV when _PRS is
absent.
Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
When ACPI Link object is enabled, the message is printed with a warning
prefix. Some test tools are capturing warning and test error types as
errors. Let's reduce the verbosity of success case.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit 103544d869 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
replaced the addition of PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING in acpi_pci_link_allocate()
with an addition in acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(), but f7eca374f0
("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation") removed the use
of acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty() for ISA IRQs.
Therefore, PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING is missing from ISA IRQs used by
interrupt links. Include that penalty by adding it in the
acpi_pci_link_allocate() path.
Fixes: f7eca374f0 (ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation)
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Ondrej reported that IRQs stopped working in v4.7 on several
platforms. A typical scenario, from Ondrej's VT82C694X/694X, is:
ACPI: Using PIC for interrupt routing
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs 1 3 4 5 6 7 10 *11 12 14 15)
ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA]
8139too 0000:00:0f.0: PCI INT A: no GSI
We're using PIC routing, so acpi_irq_balance == 0, and LNKA is already
active at IRQ 11. In that case, acpi_pci_link_allocate() only tries
to use the active IRQ (IRQ 11) which also happens to be the SCI.
We should penalize the SCI by PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING, but
irq_get_trigger_type(11) returns something other than
IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW, so we penalize it by PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS
instead, which makes acpi_pci_link_allocate() assume the IRQ isn't
available and give up.
Add acpi_penalize_sci_irq() so platforms can tell us the SCI IRQ,
trigger, and polarity directly and we don't have to depend on
irq_get_trigger_type().
Fixes: 103544d869 (ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements)
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201609251512.05657.linux@rainbow-software.org
Reported-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
We do not want to store the SCI penalty in the acpi_isa_irq_penalty[]
table because acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] only holds ISA IRQ penalties and
there's no guarantee that the SCI is an ISA IRQ. We add in the SCI
penalty as a special case in acpi_irq_get_penalty().
But if we called acpi_penalize_isa_irq() or acpi_irq_penalty_update()
for an SCI that happened to be an ISA IRQ, they stored the SCI
penalty (part of the acpi_irq_get_penalty() return value) in
acpi_isa_irq_penalty[]. Subsequent calls to acpi_irq_get_penalty()
returned a penalty that included *two* SCI penalties.
Fixes: 103544d869 (ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements)
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Since commit 103544d869 (ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements)
the penalty values are calculated on the fly rather than at boot time.
This works fine for PCI interrupts but not so well for ISA interrupts.
The information on whether or not an ISA interrupt is in use is not
available to the pci_link.c code directly. That information is
obtained from the outside via acpi_penalize_isa_irq(). [If its
"active" argument is true, then the IRQ is in use by ISA.]
Since the current code relies on PCI Link objects for determination
of penalties, we are factoring in the PCI penalty twice after
acpi_penalize_isa_irq() function is called.
To avoid that, limit the newly added functionality to just PCI
interrupts so that old behavior is still maintained.
Fixes: 103544d869 (ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements)
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Wim Osterholt <wim@djo.tudelft.nl>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Trying to make the ISA and PCI init functionality common turned out
to be a bad idea, because the ISA path depends on external
functionality.
Restore the previous behavior and limit the refactoring to PCI
interrupts only.
Fixes: 1fcb6a813c "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove redundant code in acpi_irq_penalty_init()"
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Wim Osterholt <wim@djo.tudelft.nl>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The change introduced in commit 103544d869 (ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce
resource requirements) omitted the initially applied PCI_POSSIBLE
penalty when the IRQ is active.
Incorrect calculation of the penalty leads the ACPI code to assigning
a wrong interrupt number to a PCI INTx interrupt.
This would not be as bad as it sounds in theory. It would just cause
the interrupts to be shared and result in performance penalty.
However, some drivers (like the parallel port driver) don't like
interrupt sharing and in the above case they will causes all of
the PCI drivers wanting to share the interrupt to be unable to
request it.
The issue has not been caught in testing because the behavior is
platform-specific and depends on the peripherals ending up sharing
the IRQ and their drivers.
Before the above commit the code would add the PCI_POSSIBLE value
divided by the number of possible IRQ users to the IRQ penalty
during initialization.
Later in that code path, if the IRQ is chosen as the active IRQ or
if it is used by ISA; additional penalties are added.
Fixes: 103544d869 (ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements)
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Wim Osterholt <wim@djo.tudelft.nl>
[ rjw: Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The omitted parenthesis prevents the addition operation when
acpi_penalize_isa_irq function is called.
Fixes: 103544d869 (ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements)
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
acpi_irq_get_penalty is now calculating the penalty on the fly now.
No need to maintain global list of penalties or calculate them
at the init time. Removing duplicate code in acpi_irq_penalty_init.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Now that the supported number of PCI IRQs are no longer capped
with 256, renaming the static array to support ISA IRQs only
and removing the MAX_IRQS constant.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Code has been redesigned to calculate penalty requirements on the fly. This
significantly simplifies the implementation and removes some of the init
calls from x86 architecture.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Revert commit 0971686954 "ACPI / PCI: Simplify acpi_penalize_isa_irq()"
that depends on commit b5bd026954 (ACPI, PCI, irq: remove interrupt
count restriction) which introduced a regression and needs to be
reverted for this reason.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
acpi_penalize_isa_irq() can be written in fewer lines of code,
so do that. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Works-for: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
The ACPI compiler uses the extended format when used interrupt numbers
are greater than 15. The extended IRQ syntax is 32 bits according to the
ACPI spec. The code supports parsing the extended interrupt numbers.
However, due to used data structure type; the code silently truncates
interrupt numbers greater than 256.
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Code currently supports 256 maximum interrupts at this moment. The patch is
reconfiguring the penalty array as a dynamic list to remove this
limitation.
A new penalty linklist has been added for all other interrupts greater than
16. If an IRQ is not found in the link list, an IRQ info structure will be
dynamically allocated on the first access and will be placed on the list
for further reuse. The list will grow by the number of supported interrupts
in the ACPI table rather than having a 256 hard limitation.
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Now we have dedicated interface acpi_penalize_sci_irq() to penalize
ISA IRQ used by ACPI SCI, so remove duplicated code to penalize ACPI SCI
in acpi_irq_penalty_init().
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Avoid IRQs occupied by ISA IRQs when allocating IRQs for PCI link devices,
otherwise it may cause interrupt storm due to incompatible pin attributes.
This issue was triggered on a KVM virtual machine, which
1) uses IRQ9 for SCI in high level mode.
2) defines an PCI interrupt link device (LNKS) with IRQ9 as the only
possible irq.
3) has an PCI device referring to link device LNKS.
So it causes interrupt storm when enabling the PCI device because PCI IRQ
works in low level mode.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Nick Meier reported a regression with HyperV that "
After rebooting the VM, the following messages are logged in syslog
when trying to load the tulip driver:
tulip: Linux Tulip drivers version 1.1.15 (Feb 27, 2007)
tulip: 0000:00:0a.0: PCI INT A: failed to register GSI
tulip: Cannot enable tulip board #0, aborting
tulip: probe of 0000:00:0a.0 failed with error -16
Errors occur in 3.19.0 kernel
Works in 3.17 kernel.
"
According to the ACPI dump file posted by Nick at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1440072
The ACPI MADT table includes an interrupt source overridden entry for
ACPI SCI:
[236h 0566 1] Subtable Type : 02 <Interrupt Source Override>
[237h 0567 1] Length : 0A
[238h 0568 1] Bus : 00
[239h 0569 1] Source : 09
[23Ah 0570 4] Interrupt : 00000009
[23Eh 0574 2] Flags (decoded below) : 000D
Polarity : 1
Trigger Mode : 3
And in DSDT table, we have _PRT method to define PCI interrupts, which
eventually goes to:
Name (PRSA, ResourceTemplate ()
{
IRQ (Level, ActiveLow, Shared, )
{3,4,5,7,9,10,11,12,14,15}
})
Name (PRSB, ResourceTemplate ()
{
IRQ (Level, ActiveLow, Shared, )
{3,4,5,7,9,10,11,12,14,15}
})
Name (PRSC, ResourceTemplate ()
{
IRQ (Level, ActiveLow, Shared, )
{3,4,5,7,9,10,11,12,14,15}
})
Name (PRSD, ResourceTemplate ()
{
IRQ (Level, ActiveLow, Shared, )
{3,4,5,7,9,10,11,12,14,15}
})
According to the MADT and DSDT tables, IRQ 9 may be used for:
1) ACPI SCI in level, high mode
2) PCI legacy IRQ in level, low mode
So there's a conflict in polarity setting for IRQ 9.
Prior to commit cd68f6bd53 ("x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special
handling of GSI for ACPI SCI"), ACPI SCI is handled specially and
there's no check for conflicts between ACPI SCI and PCI legagy IRQ.
And it seems that the HyperV hypervisor doesn't make use of the
polarity configuration in IOAPIC entry, so it just works.
Commit cd68f6bd53 gets rid of the specially handling of ACPI SCI,
and then the pin attribute checking code discloses the conflicts
between ACPI SCI and PCI legacy IRQ on HyperV virtual machine,
and rejects the request to assign IRQ9 to PCI devices.
So penalize legacy IRQ used by ACPI SCI and mark it unusable if ACPI
SCI attributes conflict with PCI IRQ attributes.
Please refer to following links for more information:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101301https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1440072
Fixes: cd68f6bd53 ("x86, irq, acpi: Get rid of special handling of GSI for ACPI SCI")
Reported-and-tested-by: Nick Meier <nmeier@microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: 3.19+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.19+
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There is no need to carry potentially outdated Free Software Foundation
mailing address in file headers since the COPYING file includes it.
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
We already have a macro for PREFIX of "ACPI: " in
drivers/acpi/internal.h, so remove the duplicate ones
in ACPI drivers when internal.h is included.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Includes appropriate header file internal.h in pci_link.c
because function acpi_pci_link_init() has its prototype declaration in
internal.h.
This eliminates the following warning in pci_link.c:
drivers/acpi/pci_link.c:874:13: warning: no previous prototype for ‘acpi_pci_link_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Alex Hung
Sinan Kaya
Rafael J. Wysocki
Jiang Liu
Jarkko Nikula
Hanjun Guo
Rashika