ACPI driver should make sure all the processor IDs in their ACPI Namespace
are unique. the driver performs a depth-first walk of the namespace tree
and calls the acpi_processor_ids_walk() to check the duplicate IDs.
But, the acpi_processor_ids_walk() mistakes the return value. If a
processor is checked, it returns true which causes the walk break
immediately, and other processors will never be checked.
Repace the value with AE_OK which is the standard acpi_status value.
And don't abort the namespace walk even on error.
Fixes: 8c8cb30f49 (acpi/processor: Implement DEVICE operator for processor enumeration)
Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The function acpi_processor_check_duplicates() is local to the source
and does not need to be in global scope, so make it static.
Cleans up sparse warnings:
symbol 'acpi_processor_check_duplicates' was not declared. Should it
be static?
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
When maxcpus=X kernel argument is used, we parse the ACPI tables only
for the first X cpus. The per-cpu ACPI data include the _PSD tables
which gives information about related cpus.
cppc_cpufreq and acpi-cpufreq parses the table once during init to
deduce the related cpus. If a user brings a new cpu online after boot
the related cpu data becomes incorrect.
acpi_get_psd_map() in acpi_cppc.c returns error if it fails to find
the parsed ACPI data for possible CPU resulting in cppc_cpufreq
initialization failure.
With this change we will probe all possible CPUs prior to cpufreq
initialization, but will bring only setup_max_cpus online. nr_cpus
kernel parameter can be used to restict even parsing per-cpu ACPI
tables.
Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org>
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
We may or may not have all possible CPUs in MADT on boot but in any
case we're overwriting x86_cpu_to_acpiid mapping with U32_MAX when
acpi_register_lapic() is called again on the CPU hotplug path:
acpi_processor_hotadd_init()
-> acpi_map_cpu()
-> acpi_register_lapic()
As we have the required acpi_id information in acpi_processor_hotadd_init()
propagate it to acpi_map_cpu() to always keep x86_cpu_to_acpiid
mapping valid.
Reported-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Roland Dreier reports that one of his systems cannot boot because of
the changes made by commit ac212b6980 (ACPI / processor: Use common
hotplug infrastructure).
The problematic part of it is the request_region() call in
acpi_processor_get_info() that used to run at module init time before
the above commit and now it runs much earlier. Unfortunately, the
region(s) reserved by it fall into a range the PCI subsystem attempts
to reserve for AHCI IO BARs. As a result, the PCI reservation fails
and AHCI doesn't work, while previously the PCI reservation would
be made before acpi_processor_get_info() and it would succeed.
That request_region() call, however, was overlooked by commit
ac212b6980, as it is not necessary for the enumeration of the
processors. It only is needed when the ACPI processor driver
actually attempts to handle them which doesn't happen before
loading the ACPI processor driver module. Therefore that call
should have been moved from acpi_processor_get_info() into that
module.
Address the problem by moving the request_region() call in question
out of acpi_processor_get_info() and use the observation that the
region reserved by it is only needed if the FADT-based CPU
throttling method is going to be used, which means that it should
be sufficient to invoke it from acpi_processor_get_throttling_fadt().
Fixes: ac212b6980 (ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure)
Reported-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Tested-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There are several reports of freeze on enabling HWP (Hardware PStates)
feature on Skylake-based systems by the Intel P-states driver. The root
cause is identified as the HWP interrupts causing BIOS code to freeze.
HWP interrupts use the thermal LVT which can be handled by Linux
natively, but on the affected Skylake-based systems SMM will respond
to it by default. This is a problem for several reasons:
- On the affected systems the SMM thermal LVT handler is broken (it
will crash when invoked) and a BIOS update is necessary to fix it.
- With thermal interrupt handled in SMM we lose all of the reporting
features of the arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt driver.
- Some thermal drivers like x86-package-temp depend on the thermal
threshold interrupts signaled via the thermal LVT.
- The HWP interrupts are useful for debugging and tuning
performance (if the kernel can handle them).
The native handling of thermal interrupts needs to be enabled
because of that.
This requires some way to tell SMM that the OS can handle thermal
interrupts. That can be done by using _OSC/_PDC in processor
scope very early during ACPI initialization.
The meaning of _OSC/_PDC bit 12 in processor scope is whether or
not the OS supports native handling of interrupts for Collaborative
Processor Performance Control (CPPC) notifications. Since on
HWP-capable systems CPPC is a firmware interface to HWP, setting
this bit effectively tells the firmware that the OS will handle
thermal interrupts natively going forward.
For details on _OSC/_PDC refer to:
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/standards/processor-vendor-specific-acpi-specification.html
To implement the _OSC/_PDC handshake as described, introduce a new
function, acpi_early_processor_osc(), that walks the ACPI
namespace looking for ACPI processor objects and invokes _OSC for
them with bit 12 in the capabilities buffer set and terminates the
namespace walk on the first success.
Also modify intel_thermal_interrupt() to clear HWP status bits in
the HWP_STATUS MSR to acknowledge HWP interrupts (which prevents
them from firing continuously).
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject & changelog, function rename ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ACPI 6.0 adds support for optional processor container device which may
contain child objects that are either processor devices or other processor
containers. This allows representing hierarchical processor topologies.
It is declared using the _HID of ACPI0010. It is an abstract container
used to represent CPU topology and should not be used to hotplug
purposes.
If no matching handler is found for a device in acpi_scan_attach_handler,
acpi_bus_attach does a default enumeration for those devices with valid
HID in the acpi namespace. This patch adds a scan handler for these ACPI
processor containers to avoid default that enumeration and ensures the
platform devices are not created for them.
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Add weak functions for architectures which do not support
hot-adding and removing CPUs which aren't detected at
bootup. (e.g. via MADT).
This helps preserve the Kconfig dependency from:
commit cbfc1bae55 ("[ACPI] ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU Kconfig dependency
update")
prevent:
HOTPLUG_CPU=y
ACPI_PROCESSOR=y
ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU=n
Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The processor_handler structure does not reference any __init / __exit
code or data. Therefore the __refdata annotation is not needed. It used
to be prior to commit fe7bf106eb ("acpi: delete __cpuinit usage from
all acpi files") due to the __cpuinit annotation of acpi_processor_add().
But with that commit in place that requirement has gone.
The same is true for the acpi_cpu_notifier notifier block.
acpi_cpu_soft_notify() used to be marked __cpuinit but lost its
annotation in the above mentioned commit as well. Therefore the __refdata
annotation isn't needed there either.
Just drop the unneded __refdata annotations to be able to catch future
section mismatches.
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Introduce invalid_phys_cpuid() to identify cpu with invalid
physical ID, then used it as replacement of the direct comparisons
with PHYS_CPUID_INVALID.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In ACPI processor drivers, we use direct comparisons of cpu logical
id with -1 which are error prone in case logical cpuid is accidentally
assinged an error code and prevents us from returning an error-encoding
cpuid directly in some cases.
So introduce invalid_logical_cpuid() to identify cpu with invalid
logical cpu num, then it will be used to replace the direct comparisons
with -1.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
CPU hardware ID (phys_id) is defined as u32 in structure acpi_processor,
but phys_id is used as int in acpi processor driver, so it will lead to
some inconsistence for the drivers.
Furthermore, to cater for ACPI arch ports that implement 64 bits CPU
ids a generic CPU physical id type is required.
So introduce typedef u32 phys_cpuid_t in a common file, and introduce
a macro PHYS_CPUID_INVALID as (phys_cpuid_t)(-1) if it's not defined
by other archs, this will solve the inconsistence in acpi processor driver,
and will prepare for the ACPI on ARM64 for the 64 bit CPU hardware ID
in the following patch.
CC: Rafael J Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
[hj: reworked cpu physid map return codes]
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
acpi_map_lsapic() will allocate a logical CPU number and map it to
physical CPU id (such as APIC id) for the hot-added CPU, it will also
do some mapping for NUMA node id and etc, acpi_unmap_lsapic() will
do the reverse.
We can see that the name of the function is a little bit confusing and
arch (IA64) dependent so rename them as acpi_(un)map_cpu() to make arch
agnostic and explicit.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
apic_id in MADT table is the CPU hardware id which identify
it self in the system for x86 and ia64, OSPM will use it for
SMP init to map APIC ID to logical cpu number in the early
boot, when the DSDT/SSDT (ACPI namespace) is scanned later, the
ACPI processor driver is probed and the driver will use acpi_id
in DSDT to get the apic_id, then map to the logical cpu number
which is needed by the processor driver.
Before ACPI 5.0, only x86 and ia64 were supported in ACPI spec,
so apic_id is used both in arch code and ACPI core which is
pretty fine. Since ACPI 5.0, ARM is supported by ACPI and
APIC is not available on ARM, this will confuse people when
apic_id is both used by x86 and ARM in one function.
So convert apic_id to phys_id (which is the original meaning)
in ACPI processor dirver to make it arch agnostic, but leave the
arch dependent code unchanged, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Now ARM64 support is being added to ACPI so architecture specific
values can not be used in core ACPI code.
Following on the patch "ACPI / processor: Check if LAPIC is present
during initialization" which uses acpi_lapic in acpi_processor.c,
on ARM64 platform, GIC is used instead of local APIC, so acpi_lapic
is not a suitable value for ARM64.
What is actually important at this point is if there is/are CPU
entry/entries (Local APIC/SAPIC, GICC) in MADT, so introduce
acpi_has_cpu_in_madt() to be arch specific and generic.
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Dou Liyang
Gustavo A. R. Silva
Colin Ian King
Prakash, Prashanth
Vitaly Kuznetsov
Gu Zheng
Rafael J. Wysocki
Srinivas Pandruvada
Sudeep Holla
Ashwin Chaugule
Mathias Krause
Hanjun Guo
Catalin Marinas
Hanjun Guo
Graeme Gregory