When the last CPU in an rdt_domain goes offline, its rdt_domain struct gets
freed. Current pseudo-locking code is unaware of this scenario and tries to
dereference the freed structure in a few places.
Add checks to prevent pseudo-locking code from doing this.
While further work is needed to seamlessly restore resource groups (not
just pseudo-locking) to their configuration when the domain is brought back
online, the immediate issue of invalid pointers is addressed here.
Fixes: f4e80d67a5 ("x86/intel_rdt: Resctrl files reflect pseudo-locked information")
Fixes: 443810fe61 ("x86/intel_rdt: Create debugfs files for pseudo-locking testing")
Fixes: 746e08590b ("x86/intel_rdt: Create character device exposing pseudo-locked region")
Fixes: 33dc3e410a ("x86/intel_rdt: Make CPU information accessible for pseudo-locked regions")
Signed-off-by: Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/231f742dbb7b00a31cc104416860e27dba6b072d.1539384145.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
When a new resource group is created it is initialized with a default
allocation that considers which portions of cache are currently
available for sharing across all resource groups or which portions of
cache are currently unused.
If a CDP allocation forms part of a resource group that is in exclusive
mode then it should be ensured that no new allocation overlaps with any
resource that shares the underlying hardware. The current initial
allocation does not take this sharing of hardware into account and
a new allocation in a resource that shares the same
hardware would affect the exclusive resource group.
Fix this by considering the allocation of a peer RDT domain - a RDT
domain sharing the same hardware - as part of the test to determine
which portion of cache is in use and available for use.
Fixes: 95f0b77efa ("x86/intel_rdt: Initialize new resource group with sane defaults")
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com
Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b1f7ec08b1695be067de416a4128466d49684317.1538603665.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
The CBM overlap test is used to manage the allocations of RDT resources
where overlap is possible between resource groups. When a resource group
is in exclusive mode then there should be no overlap between resource
groups.
The current overlap test only considers overlap between the same
resources, for example, that usage of a RDT_RESOURCE_L2DATA resource
in one resource group does not overlap with usage of a RDT_RESOURCE_L2DATA
resource in another resource group. The problem with this is that it
allows overlap between a RDT_RESOURCE_L2DATA resource in one resource
group with a RDT_RESOURCE_L2CODE resource in another resource group -
even if both resource groups are in exclusive mode. This is a problem
because even though these appear to be different resources they end up
sharing the same underlying hardware and thus does not fulfill the
user's request for exclusive use of hardware resources.
Fix this by including the CDP peer (if there is one) in every CBM
overlap test. This does not impact the overlap between resources
within the same exclusive resource group that is allowed.
Fixes: 49f7b4efa1 ("x86/intel_rdt: Enable setting of exclusive mode")
Reported-by: Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@intel.com>
Acked-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/e538b7f56f7ca15963dce2e00ac3be8edb8a68e1.1538603665.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Introduce a utility that, when provided with a RDT resource and an
instance of this RDT resource (a RDT domain), would return pointers to
the RDT resource and RDT domain that share the same hardware. This is
specific to the CDP resources that share the same hardware.
For example, if a pointer to the RDT_RESOURCE_L2DATA resource (struct
rdt_resource) and a pointer to an instance of this resource (struct
rdt_domain) is provided, then it will return a pointer to the
RDT_RESOURCE_L2CODE resource as well as the specific instance that
shares the same hardware as the provided rdt_domain.
This utility is created in support of the "exclusive" resource group
mode where overlap of resource allocation between resource groups need
to be avoided. The overlap test need to consider not just the matching
resources, but also the resources that share the same hardware.
Temporarily mark it as unused in support of patch testing to avoid
compile warnings until it is used.
Fixes: 49f7b4efa1 ("x86/intel_rdt: Enable setting of exclusive mode")
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@intel.com>
Acked-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/9b4bc4d59ba2e903b6a3eb17e16ef41a8e7b7c3e.1538603665.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
While the DOC at the beginning of lib/bitmap.c explicitly states that
"The number of valid bits in a given bitmap does _not_ need to be an
exact multiple of BITS_PER_LONG.", some of the bitmap operations do
indeed access BITS_PER_LONG portions of the provided bitmap no matter
the size of the provided bitmap. For example, if bitmap_intersects()
is provided with an 8 bit bitmap the operation will access
BITS_PER_LONG bits from the provided bitmap. While the operation
ensures that these extra bits do not affect the result, the memory
is still accessed.
The capacity bitmasks (CBMs) are typically stored in u32 since they
can never exceed 32 bits. A few instances exist where a bitmap_*
operation is performed on a CBM by simply pointing the bitmap operation
to the stored u32 value.
The consequence of this pattern is that some bitmap_* operations will
access out-of-bounds memory when interacting with the provided CBM. This
is confirmed with a KASAN test that reports:
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __bitmap_intersects+0xa2/0x100
and
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __bitmap_weight+0x58/0x90
Fix this by moving any CBM provided to a bitmap operation needing
BITS_PER_LONG to an 'unsigned long' variable.
[ tglx: Changed related function arguments to unsigned long and got rid
of the _cbm extra step ]
Fixes: 72d5050566 ("x86/intel_rdt: Add utilities to test pseudo-locked region possibility")
Fixes: 49f7b4efa1 ("x86/intel_rdt: Enable setting of exclusive mode")
Fixes: d9b48c86eb ("x86/intel_rdt: Display resource groups' allocations' size in bytes")
Fixes: 95f0b77efa ("x86/intel_rdt: Initialize new resource group with sane defaults")
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com
Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/69a428613a53f10e80594679ac726246020ff94f.1538686926.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
In resctrl filesystem, mount options exist to enable L3/L2 CDP and MBA
Software Controller features if the platform supports them:
mount -t resctrl resctrl [-o cdp[,cdpl2][,mba_MBps]] /sys/fs/resctrl
But currently only "cdp" option is displayed in /proc/mounts. "cdpl2" and
"mba_MBps" options are not shown even when they are active.
Before:
# mount -t resctrl resctrl -o cdp,mba_MBps /sys/fs/resctrl
# grep resctrl /proc/mounts
/sys/fs/resctrl /sys/fs/resctrl resctrl rw,relatime,cdp 0 0
After:
# mount -t resctrl resctrl -o cdp,mba_MBps /sys/fs/resctrl
# grep resctrl /proc/mounts
/sys/fs/resctrl /sys/fs/resctrl resctrl rw,relatime,cdp,mba_MBps 0 0
Signed-off-by: Xiaochen Shen <xiaochen.shen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1536796118-60135-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
In order to determine a sane default cache allocation for a new CAT/CDP
resource group, all resource groups are checked to determine which cache
portions are available to share. At this time all possible CLOSIDs
that can be supported by the resource is checked. This is problematic
if the resource supports more CLOSIDs than another CAT/CDP resource. In
this case, the number of CLOSIDs that could be allocated are fewer than
the number of CLOSIDs that can be supported by the resource.
Limit the check of closids to that what is supported by the system based
on the minimum across all resources.
Fixes: 95f0b77ef ("x86/intel_rdt: Initialize new resource group with sane defaults")
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "Xiaochen Shen" <xiaochen.shen@intel.com>
Cc: "Chen Yu" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537048707-76280-10-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
It is possible for a resource group to consist out of MBA as well as
CAT/CDP resources. The "exclusive" resource mode only applies to the
CAT/CDP resources since MBA allocations cannot be specified to overlap
or not. When a user requests a resource group to become "exclusive" then it
can only be successful if there are CAT/CDP resources in the group
and none of their CBMs associated with the group's CLOSID overlaps with
any other resource group.
Fix the "exclusive" mode setting by failing if there isn't any CAT/CDP
resource in the group and ensuring that the CBM checking is only done on
CAT/CDP resources.
Fixes: 49f7b4efa ("x86/intel_rdt: Enable setting of exclusive mode")
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "Xiaochen Shen" <xiaochen.shen@intel.com>
Cc: "Chen Yu" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537048707-76280-9-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
A loop is used to check if a CAT resource's CBM of one CLOSID
overlaps with the CBM of another CLOSID of the same resource. The loop
is run over all CLOSIDs supported by the resource.
The problem with running the loop over all CLOSIDs supported by the
resource is that its number of supported CLOSIDs may be more than the
number of supported CLOSIDs on the system, which is the minimum number of
CLOSIDs supported across all resources.
Fix the loop to only consider the number of system supported CLOSIDs,
not all that are supported by the resource.
Fixes: 49f7b4efa ("x86/intel_rdt: Enable setting of exclusive mode")
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "Xiaochen Shen" <xiaochen.shen@intel.com>
Cc: "Chen Yu" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537048707-76280-8-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
When a new resource group is created, it is initialized with sane
defaults that currently assume the resource being initialized is a CAT
resource. This code path is also followed by a MBA resource that is not
allocated the same as a CAT resource and as a result we encounter the
following unchecked MSR access error:
unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0xd51 (tried to write 0x0000
000000000064) at rIP: 0xffffffffae059994 (native_write_msr+0x4/0x20)
Call Trace:
mba_wrmsr+0x41/0x80
update_domains+0x125/0x130
rdtgroup_mkdir+0x270/0x500
Fix the above by ensuring the initial allocation is only attempted on a
CAT resource.
Fixes: 95f0b77ef ("x86/intel_rdt: Initialize new resource group with sane defaults")
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "Xiaochen Shen" <xiaochen.shen@intel.com>
Cc: "Chen Yu" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537048707-76280-6-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
When multiple resources are managed by RDT, the number of CLOSIDs used
is the minimum of the CLOSIDs supported by each resource. In the function
rdt_bit_usage_show(), the annotated bitmask is created to depict how the
CAT supporting caches are being used. During this annotated bitmask
creation, each resource group is queried for its mode that is used as a
label in the annotated bitmask.
The maximum number of resource groups is currently assumed to be the
number of CLOSIDs supported by the resource for which the information is
being displayed. This is incorrect since the number of active CLOSIDs is
the minimum across all resources.
If information for a cache instance with more CLOSIDs than another is
being generated we thus encounter a warning like:
invalid mode for closid 8
WARNING: CPU: 88 PID: 1791 at [SNIP]/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c
:827 rdt_bit_usage_show+0x221/0x2b0
Fix this by ensuring that only the number of supported CLOSIDs are
considered.
Fixes: e651901187 ("x86/intel_rdt: Introduce "bit_usage" to display cache allocations details")
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "Xiaochen Shen" <xiaochen.shen@intel.com>
Cc: "Chen Yu" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537048707-76280-5-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
The number of CLOSIDs supported by a system is the minimum number of
CLOSIDs supported by any of its resources. Care should be taken when
iterating over the CLOSIDs of a resource since it may be that the number
of CLOSIDs supported on the system is less than the number of CLOSIDs
supported by the resource.
Introduce a helper function that can be used to query the number of
CLOSIDs that is supported by all resources, irrespective of how many
CLOSIDs are supported by a particular resource.
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "Xiaochen Shen" <xiaochen.shen@intel.com>
Cc: "Chen Yu" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537048707-76280-4-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
Chen Yu reported a divide-by-zero error when accessing the 'size'
resctrl file when a MBA resource is enabled.
divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
CPU: 93 PID: 1929 Comm: cat Not tainted 4.19.0-rc2-debug-rdt+ #25
RIP: 0010:rdtgroup_cbm_to_size+0x7e/0xa0
Call Trace:
rdtgroup_size_show+0x11a/0x1d0
seq_read+0xd8/0x3b0
Quoting Chen Yu's report: This is because for MB resource, the
r->cache.cbm_len is zero, thus calculating size in rdtgroup_cbm_to_size()
will trigger the exception.
Fix this issue in the 'size' file by getting correct memory bandwidth value
which is in MBps when MBA software controller is enabled or in percentage
when MBA software controller is disabled.
Fixes: d9b48c86eb ("x86/intel_rdt: Display resource groups' allocations in bytes")
Reported-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: "H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "Xiaochen Shen" <xiaochen.shen@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180904174614.26682-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537048707-76280-3-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
This change allows creating kernfs files and directories with arbitrary
uid/gid instead of always using GLOBAL_ROOT_UID/GID by extending
kernfs_create_dir_ns() and kernfs_create_file_ns() with uid/gid arguments.
The "simple" kernfs_create_file() and kernfs_create_dir() are left alone
and always create objects belonging to the global root.
When creating symlinks ownership (uid/gid) is taken from the target kernfs
object.
Co-Developed-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
When a resource group enters pseudo-locksetup mode it reflects that the
platform supports cache pseudo-locking and the resource group is unused,
ready to be used for a pseudo-locked region. Until it is set up as a
pseudo-locked region the resource group is "locked down" such that no new
tasks or cpus can be assigned to it. This is accomplished in a user visible
way by making the cpus, cpus_list, and tasks resctrl files inaccassible
(user cannot read from or write to these files).
When the resource group changes to pseudo-locked mode it represents a cache
pseudo-locked region. While not appropriate to make any changes to the cpus
assigned to this region it is useful to make it easy for the user to see
which cpus are associated with the pseudo-locked region.
Modify the permissions of the cpus/cpus_list file when the resource group
changes to pseudo-locked mode to support reading (not writing). The
information presented to the user when reading the file are the cpus
associated with the pseudo-locked region.
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com
Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com
Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/12756b7963b6abc1bffe8fb560b87b75da827bd1.1530421961.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
As the mode of a resource group changes, the operations it can support may
also change. One way in which the supported operations are managed is to
modify the permissions of the files within the resource group's resctrl
directory.
At the moment only two possible permissions are supported: the default
permissions or no permissions in support for when the operation is "locked
down". It is possible where an operation on a resource group may have more
possibilities. For example, if by default changes can be made to the
resource group by writing to a resctrl file while the current settings can
be obtained by reading from the file, then it may be possible that in
another mode it is only possible to read the current settings, and not
change them.
Make it possible to modify some of the permissions of a resctrl file in
support of a more flexible way to manage the operations on a resource
group. In this preparation work the original behavior is maintained where
all permissions are restored.
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com
Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com
Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8773aadfade7bcb2c48a45fa294a04d2c03bb0a1.1530421961.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
Jithu Joseph
Reinette Chatre
Ingo Molnar
Xiaochen Shen
Linus Torvalds
Dmitry Torokhov