Currently we don't allow guests under hvf to use the PAuth extension,
because we didn't have any special code to handle that, and therefore
in arm_cpu_pauth_finalize() we will sanitize the ID_AA64ISAR1 value
the guest sees to clear the PAuth related fields.
Add support for this in the same way that KVM does it, by defaulting
to "PAuth enabled" if the host CPU has it and allowing the user to
disable it via '-cpu pauth=no' on the command line.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@csgraf.de>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220204165506.2846058-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Currently when using hvf we mishandle '-cpu max': we fall through to
the TCG version of its initfn, which then sets a lot of feature bits
that the real host CPU doesn't have. The hvf accelerator code then
exposes these bogus ID register values to the guest because it
doesn't check that the host really has the features.
Make '-cpu host' be like '-cpu max' for hvf, as we do with kvm.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@csgraf.de>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220204165506.2846058-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Currently for KVM the intention is that '-cpu max' and '-cpu host'
are the same thing, but because we did this with two separate
pieces of code they have got a little bit out of sync. Specifically,
'max' has a 'sve-max-vq' property, and 'host' does not.
Bring the two together by having the initfn for 'max' actually
call the initfn for 'host'. This will result in 'max' no longer
exposing the 'sve-max-vq' property when using KVM.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@csgraf.de>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220204165506.2846058-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Use the aarch64_cpu_register() machinery to register the 'host' CPU
type. This doesn't gain us anything functionally, but it does mean
that the code for initializing it looks more like that for the other
CPU types, in that its initfn then doesn't need to call
arm_cpu_post_init() (because aarch64_cpu_instance_init() does that
for it).
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@csgraf.de>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220204165506.2846058-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
We are parsing the syndrome field for sysregs in multiple places across
the hvf code, but repeat shift/mask operations with hard coded constants
every time. This is an error prone approach and makes it harder to reason
about the correctness of these operations.
Let's introduce macros that allow us to unify the constants used as well
as create new helpers to extract fields from the sysreg value.
Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@csgraf.de>
Reviewed-by: Cameron Esfahani <dirty@apple.com <mailto:dirty@apple.com>>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20220209124135.69183-1-agraf@csgraf.de
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Let's leave cpu_init with just generic CPU initialization and
QOM-related functions.
The rest of the SPR registration functions will be moved in the
following patches along with the code that uses them. These are only
the commonly used ones.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-28-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
These will need to be accessed from other files once we move the CPUs
code to separate files.
The check_pow_hid0 and check_pow_hid0_74xx are too specific to be
moved to a header so I'll deal with them later when splitting this
code between the multiple CPU families.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-27-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The following patches will move CPU-specific code into separate files,
so expose the most used SPR registration functions:
register_sdr1_sprs | 22 callers
register_low_BATs | 20 callers
register_non_embedded_sprs | 19 callers
register_high_BATs | 10 callers
register_thrm_sprs | 8 callers
register_usprgh_sprs | 6 callers
register_6xx_7xx_soft_tlb | only 3 callers, but it helps to
keep the soft TLB code consistent.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-25-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Initial intent for the spr_tcg header was to expose the spr_read|write
callbacks that are only used by TCG code. However, although these
routines are TCG-specific, the KVM code needs access to env->sprs
which creation is currently coupled to the callback registration.
We are probably not going to decouple SPR creation and TCG callback
registration any time soon, so let's rename the header to spr_common
to accomodate the register_*_sprs functions that will be moved out of
cpu_init.c in the following patches.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-24-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This is just to have 755-specific registers contained into a function,
intead of leaving them open-coded in init_proc_755. It makes init_proc
easier to read and keeps later patches that touch this code a bit
cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-16-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 745 and 755 can share the HID registration, so move it all into
register_755_sprs, which applies for both CPUs.
Also rename that function to register_745_sprs, since the 745 is the
earliest of the two. This will help with separating 755-specific
registers in a subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220216162426.1885923-14-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
