When ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1.ECV is 0b0010, a new register CNTPOFF_EL2 is
implemented. This is similar to the existing CNTVOFF_EL2, except
that it controls a hypervisor-adjustable offset made to the physical
counter and timer.
Implement the handling for this register, which includes control/trap
bits in SCR_EL3 and CNTHCTL_EL2.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20240301183219.2424889-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For user-only mode, use MMU_USER_IDX.
For system mode, use CPUClass.mmu_index.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
The ARM_CPU_IRQ/FIQ definitions are used to index the GPIO
IRQ created calling qdev_init_gpio_in() in ARMCPU instance_init()
handler. To allow non-ARM code to raise interrupt on ARM cores,
move they to 'target/arm/cpu-qom.h' which is non-ARM specific and
can be included by any hw/ file.
File list to include the new header generated using:
$ git grep -wEl 'ARM_CPU_(\w*IRQ|FIQ)'
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20240118200643.29037-18-philmd@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The ARMv7M QDev container accesses the QDev SysTickState
by its secure/non-secure bank index. In order to make
the "hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.h" header target-agnostic in
the next commit, first move the M-profile bank index
definitions to "target/arm/cpu-qom.h".
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20240118200643.29037-16-philmd@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Declare arm_cpu_mp_affinity() prototype in the new
"target/arm/multiprocessing.h" header so units in
hw/arm/ can use it without having to include the huge
target-specific "cpu.h".
File list to include the new header generated using:
$ git grep -lw arm_cpu_mp_affinity
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20240118200643.29037-11-philmd@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
If FEAT_NV2 redirects a system register access to a memory offset
from VNCR_EL2, that access might fault. In this case we need to
report the correct syndrome information:
* Data Abort, from same-EL
* no ISS information
* the VNCR bit (bit 13) is set
and the exception must be taken to EL2.
Save an appropriate syndrome template when generating code; we can
then use that to:
* select the right target EL
* reconstitute a correct final syndrome for the data abort
* report the right syndrome if we take a FEAT_RME granule protection
fault on the VNCR-based write
Note that because VNCR is bit 13, we must start keeping bit 13 in
template syndromes, by adjusting ARM_INSN_START_WORD2_SHIFT.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
FEAT_NV2 requires that when HCR_EL2.{NV,NV2} == 0b11 then accesses by
EL1 to certain system registers are redirected to RAM. The full list
of affected registers is in the table in rule R_CSRPQ in the Arm ARM.
The registers may be normally accessible at EL1 (like ACTLR_EL1), or
normally UNDEF at EL1 (like HCR_EL2). Some registers redirect to RAM
only when HCR_EL2.NV1 is 0, and some only when HCR_EL2.NV1 is 1;
others trap in both cases.
Add the infrastructure for identifying which registers should be
redirected and turning them into memory accesses.
This code does not set the correct syndrome or arrange for the
exception to be taken to the correct target EL if the access via
VNCR_EL2 faults; we will do that in the next commit.
Subsequent commits will mark up the relevant regdefs to set their
nv2_redirect_offset, and if relevant one of the two flags which
indicates that the redirect happens only for a particular value of
HCR_EL2.NV1.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Under FEAT_NV2, when HCR_EL2.{NV,NV2} == 0b11 at EL1, accesses to the
registers SPSR_EL2, ELR_EL2, ESR_EL2, FAR_EL2 and TFSR_EL2 (which
would UNDEF without FEAT_NV or FEAT_NV2) should instead access the
equivalent EL1 registers SPSR_EL1, ELR_EL1, ESR_EL1, FAR_EL1 and
TFSR_EL1.
Because there are only five registers involved and the encoding for
the EL1 register is identical to that of the EL2 register except
that opc1 is 0, we handle this by finding the EL1 register in the
hash table and using it instead.
Note that traps that apply to direct accesses to the EL1 register,
such as active fine-grained traps or other trap bits, do not trigger
when it is accessed via the EL2 encoding in this way. However, some
traps that are defined by the EL2 register may apply. We therefore
call the EL2 register's accessfn first. The only one of the five
which has such traps is TFSR_EL2: make sure its accessfn correctly
handles both FEAT_NV (where we trap to EL2 without checking ATA bits)
and FEAT_NV2 (where we check ATA bits and then redirect to TFSR_EL1).
(We don't need the NV1 tbflag bit until the next patch, but we
introduce it here to avoid putting the NV, NV1, NV2 bits in an
odd order.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
For FEAT_NV2, a new system register VNCR_EL2 holds the base
address of the memory which nested-guest system register
accesses are redirected to. Implement this register.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
For FEAT_NV, accesses to system registers and instructions from EL1
which would normally UNDEF there but which work in EL2 need to
instead be trapped to EL2. Detect this both for "we know this will
UNDEF at translate time" and "we found this UNDEFs at runtime", and
make the affected registers trap to EL2 instead.
The Arm ARM defines the set of registers that should trap in terms
of their names; for our implementation this would be both awkward
and inefficent as a test, so we instead trap based on the opc1
field of the sysreg. The regularity of the architectural choice
of encodings for sysregs means that in practice this captures
exactly the correct set of registers.
Regardless of how we try to define the registers this trapping
applies to, there's going to be a certain possibility of breakage
if new architectural features introduce new registers that don't
follow the current rules (FEAT_MEC is one example already visible
in the released sysreg XML, though not yet in the Arm ARM). This
approach seems to me to be straightforward and likely to require
a minimum of manual overrides.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
The TBFLAG_A64 TB flag bits go in flags2, which for AArch64 guests
we know is 64 bits. However at the moment we use FIELD_EX32() and
FIELD_DP32() to read and write these bits, which only works for
bits 0 to 31. Since we're about to add a flag that uses bit 32,
switch to FIELD_EX64() and FIELD_DP64() so that this will work.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
When FEAT_NV is turned on via the HCR_EL2.NV bit, ERET instructions
are trapped, with the same syndrome information as for the existing
FEAT_FGT fine-grained trap (in the pseudocode this is handled in
AArch64.CheckForEretTrap()).
Rename the DisasContext and tbflag bits to reflect that they are
no longer exclusively for FGT traps, and set the tbflag bit when
FEAT_NV is enabled as well as when the FGT is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
The OBJECT_DECLARE_CPU_TYPE() macro forward-declares each
ArchCPUClass type. These forward declarations are sufficient
for code in hw/ to use the QOM definitions. No need to expose
these structure definitions. Keep each local to their target/
by moving them to the corresponding "cpu.h" header.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20231013140116.255-13-philmd@linaro.org>
Enforce the style described by commit 067109a11c ("docs/devel:
mention the spacing requirement for QOM"):
The first declaration of a storage or class structure should
always be the parent and leave a visual space between that
declaration and the new code. It is also useful to separate
backing for properties (options driven by the user) and internal
state to make navigation easier.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20231013140116.255-2-philmd@linaro.org>
The feature test functions isar_feature_*() now take up nearly
a thousand lines in target/arm/cpu.h. This header file is included
by a lot of source files, most of which don't need these functions.
Move the feature test functions to their own header file.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20231024163510.2972081-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The code for powering on a CPU in arm-powerctl.c has two separate
use cases:
* emulation of a real hardware power controller
* emulation of firmware interfaces (primarily PSCI) with
CPU on/off APIs
For the first case, we only need to reset the CPU and set its
starting PC and X0. For the second case, because we're emulating the
firmware we need to ensure that it's in the state that the firmware
provides. In particular, when we reset to a lower EL than the
highest one we are emulating, we need to put the CPU into a state
that permits correct running at that lower EL. We already do a
little of this in arm-powerctl.c (for instance we set SCR_HCE to
enable the HVC insn) but we don't do enough of it. This means that
in the case where we are emulating EL3 but also providing emulated
PSCI the guest will crash when a secondary core tries to use a
feature that needs an SCR_EL3 bit to be set, such as MTE or PAuth.
The hw/arm/boot.c code also has to support this "start guest code in
an EL that's lower than the highest emulated EL" case in order to do
direct guest kernel booting; it has all the necessary initialization
code to set the SCR_EL3 bits. Pull the relevant boot.c code out into
a separate function so we can share it between there and
arm-powerctl.c.
This refactoring has a few code changes that look like they
might be behaviour changes but aren't:
* if info->secure_boot is false and info->secure_board_setup is
true, then the old code would start the first CPU in Hyp
mode but without changing SCR.NS and NSACR.{CP11,CP10}.
This was wrong behaviour because there's no such thing
as Secure Hyp mode. The new code will leave the CPU in SVC.
(There is no board which sets secure_boot to false and
secure_board_setup to true, so this isn't a behaviour
change for any of our boards.)
* we don't explicitly clear SCR.NS when arm-powerctl.c
does a CPU-on to EL3. This was a no-op because CPU reset
will reset to NS == 0.
And some real behaviour changes:
* we no longer set HCR_EL2.RW when booting into EL2: the guest
can and should do that themselves before dropping into their
EL1 code. (arm-powerctl and boot did this differently; I
opted to use the logic from arm-powerctl, which only sets
HCR_EL2.RW when it's directly starting the guest in EL1,
because it's more correct, and I don't expect guests to be
accidentally depending on our having set the RW bit for them.)
* if we are booting a CPU into AArch32 Secure SVC then we won't
set SCR.HCE any more. This affects only the vexpress-a15 and
raspi2b machine types. Guests booting in this case will either:
- be able to set SCR.HCE themselves as part of moving from
Secure SVC into NS Hyp mode
- will move from Secure SVC to NS SVC, and won't care about
behaviour of the HVC insn
- will stay in Secure SVC, and won't care about HVC
* on an arm-powerctl CPU-on we will now set the SCR bits for
pauth/mte/sve/sme/hcx/fgt features
The first two of these are very minor and I don't expect guest
code to trip over them, so I didn't judge it worth convoluting
the code in an attempt to keep exactly the same boot.c behaviour.
The third change fixes issue 1899.
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1899
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20230926155619.4028618-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
