Factor it out into common code when a new notifier is registered, just
as done with the memory region notifier. This keeps logic about how to
process existing ram blocks at a central place.
Just like when adding a new ram block, we have to register the max_length.
Ram blocks are only "fake resized". All memory (max_length) is mapped.
Print the warning from inside qemu_vfio_ram_block_added().
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210429112708.12291-2-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Over the years, most parts of exec.c that were not specific to softmmu
have been moved to accel/tcg; what's left is mostly the low-level part
of the memory API, which includes RAMBlock and AddressSpaceDispatch.
However exec.c also hosts 4-500 lines of code for the target specific
parts of the CPU QOM object, plus a few functions for user-mode
emulation that do not have a better place (they are not TCG-specific so
accel/tcg/user-exec.c is not a good place either).
Move these parts to a new file, so that exec.c can be moved to
softmmu/physmem.c.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Use an explicit boolean type.
This commit was produced with the included Coccinelle script
scripts/coccinelle/exec_rw_const.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
As we are only dealing with a blob buffer, use a void pointer
argument. This will let us simplify other APIs.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
It does not require going through the whole I/O path
in order to discard a write.
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
The various TARGET_cpu_list() take an fprintf()-like callback and a
FILE * to pass to it. Their callers (vl.c's main() via list_cpus(),
bsd-user/main.c's main(), linux-user/main.c's main()) all pass
fprintf() and stdout. Thus, the flexibility provided by the (rather
tiresome) indirection isn't actually used.
Drop the callback, and call qemu_printf() instead.
Calling printf() would also work, but would make the code unsuitable
for monitor context without making it simpler.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190417191805.28198-10-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
If ignore-shared capability is set then skip shared RAMBlocks during the
RAM migration.
Also, move qemu_ram_foreach_migratable_block (and rename) to the
migration code, because it requires access to the migration capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Yury Kotov <yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20190215174548.2630-4-yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Currently, qemu_ram_foreach_* calls RAMBlockIterFunc with many
block-specific arguments. But often iter func needs RAMBlock*.
This refactoring is needed for fast access to RAMBlock flags from
qemu_ram_foreach_block's callback. The only way to achieve this now
is to call qemu_ram_block_from_host (which also enumerates blocks).
So, this patch reduces complexity of
qemu_ram_foreach_block() -> cb() -> qemu_ram_block_from_host()
from O(n^2) to O(n).
Fix RAMBlockIterFunc definition and add some functions to read
RAMBlock* fields witch were passed.
Signed-off-by: Yury Kotov <yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru>
Message-Id: <20190215174548.2630-2-yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Some address/memory APIs have different type between
'hwaddr/target_ulong addr' and 'int len'. It is very unsafe, especially
some APIs will be passed a non-int len by caller which might cause
overflow quietly.
Below is an potential overflow case:
dma_memory_read(uint32_t len)
-> dma_memory_rw(uint32_t len)
-> dma_memory_rw_relaxed(uint32_t len)
-> address_space_rw(int len) # len overflow
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
CC: Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>
CC: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
CC: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
CC: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The API of cpu_physical_memory_write_rom() is odd, because it
takes an AddressSpace, unlike all the other cpu_physical_memory_*
access functions. Rename it to address_space_write_rom(), and
bring its API into line with address_space_write().
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20181122133507.30950-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Use mmap_lock in user-mode to protect TCG state and the page descriptors.
In !user-mode, each vCPU has its own TCG state, so no locks needed.
Per-page locks are used to protect the page descriptors.
Per-TB locks are used in both modes to protect TB jumps.
Some notes:
- tb_lock is removed from notdirty_mem_write by passing a
locked page_collection to tb_invalidate_phys_page_fast.
- tcg_tb_lookup/remove/insert/etc have their own internal lock(s),
so there is no need to further serialize access to them.
- do_tb_flush is run in a safe async context, meaning no other
vCPU threads are running. Therefore acquiring mmap_lock there
is just to please tools such as thread sanitizer.
- Not visible in the diff, but tb_invalidate_phys_page already
has an assert_memory_lock.
- cpu_io_recompile is !user-only, so no mmap_lock there.
- Added mmap_unlock()'s before all siglongjmp's that could
be called in user-mode while mmap_lock is held.
+ Added an assert for !have_mmap_lock() after returning from
the longjmp in cpu_exec, just like we do in cpu_exec_step_atomic.
Performance numbers before/after:
Host: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6376
ubuntu 17.04 ppc64 bootup+shutdown time
700 +-+--+----+------+------------+-----------+------------*--+-+
| + + + + + *B |
| before ***B*** ** * |
|tb lock removal ###D### *** |
600 +-+ *** +-+
| ** # |
| *B* #D |
| *** * ## |
500 +-+ *** ### +-+
| * *** ### |
| *B* # ## |
| ** * #D# |
400 +-+ ** ## +-+
| ** ### |
| ** ## |
| ** # ## |
300 +-+ * B* #D# +-+
| B *** ### |
| * ** #### |
| * *** ### |
200 +-+ B *B #D# +-+
| #B* * ## # |
| #* ## |
| + D##D# + + + + |
100 +-+--+----+------+------------+-----------+------------+--+-+
1 8 16 Guest CPUs 48 64
png: https://imgur.com/HwmBHXe
debian jessie aarch64 bootup+shutdown time
90 +-+--+-----+-----+------------+------------+------------+--+-+
| + + + + + + |
| before ***B*** B |
80 +tb lock removal ###D### **D +-+
| **### |
| **## |
70 +-+ ** # +-+
| ** ## |
| ** # |
60 +-+ *B ## +-+
| ** ## |
| *** #D |
50 +-+ *** ## +-+
| * ** ### |
| **B* ### |
40 +-+ **** # ## +-+
| **** #D# |
| ***B** ### |
30 +-+ B***B** #### +-+
| B * * # ### |
| B ###D# |
20 +-+ D ##D## +-+
| D# |
| + + + + + + |
10 +-+--+-----+-----+------------+------------+------------+--+-+
1 8 16 Guest CPUs 48 64
png: https://imgur.com/iGpGFtv
The gains are high for 4-8 CPUs. Beyond that point, however, unrelated
lock contention significantly hurts scalability.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <cota@braap.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
On the POWER9 processor, the XIVE interrupt controller can control
interrupt sources using MMIO to trigger events, to EOI or to turn off
the sources. Priority management and interrupt acknowledgment is also
controlled by MMIO in the presenter sub-engine.
These MMIO regions are exposed to guests in QEMU with a set of 'ram
device' memory mappings, similarly to VFIO, and the VMAs are populated
dynamically with the appropriate pages using a fault handler.
But, these regions are an issue for migration. We need to discard the
associated RAMBlocks from the RAM state on the source VM and let the
destination VM rebuild the memory mappings on the new host in the
post_load() operation just before resuming the system.
To achieve this goal, the following introduces a new RAMBlock flag
RAM_MIGRATABLE which is updated in the vmstate_register_ram() and
vmstate_unregister_ram() routines. This flag is then used by the
migration to identify RAMBlocks to discard on the source. Some checks
are also performed on the destination to make sure nothing invalid was
sent.
This change impacts the boston, malta and jazz mips boards for which
migration compatibility is broken.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Use a flag on the RAMBlock to state whether it has the
UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE capability, use it when it's available.
This allows the use of postcopy on tmpfs as well as hugepage
backed files.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Utility to give the offset of a host pointer within a RAMBlock
(assuming we already know it's in that RAMBlock)
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Commit 1f5c00cfdb ("qom/cpu: move tlb_flush to cpu_common_reset")
moved the call to tlb_flush() from the target-specific reset handlers
into the common code qom/cpu.c file, and protected the call with
"#ifdef CONFIG_SOFTMMU" to avoid that it is called for linux-user
only targets. But since qom/cpu.c is common code, CONFIG_SOFTMMU is
*never* defined here, so the tlb_flush() was simply never executed
anymore. Fix it by introducing a wrapper for tlb_flush() in a file
that is re-compiled for each target, i.e. in translate-all.c.
Fixes: 1f5c00cfdb
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1498454578-18709-5-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Provide a helper to say whether a RAMBlock was created as a
shared mapping.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
At the moment ram device's memory regions are DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN. It's
incorrect. This memory region is backed by a MMIO area in host, so the
uint64_t data that MemoryRegionOps read from/write to this area should be
host-endian rather than target-endian. Hence, current code does not work
when target and host endianness are different which is the most common case
on PPC64. To fix it, this introduces DEVICE_HOST_ENDIAN for the ram device.
This has been tested on PPC64 BE/LE host/guest in all possible combinations
including TCG.
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Yongji Xie <xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <1488171164-28319-1-git-send-email-xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Create ram_block_discard_range in exec.c to replace
postcopy_ram_discard_range and most of ram_discard_range.
Those two routines are a bit of a weird combination, and
ram_discard_range is about to get more complex for hugepages.
It's OS dependent code (so shouldn't be in migration/ram.c) but
it needs quite a bit of the innards of RAMBlock so doesn't belong in
the os*.c.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170224182844.32452-5-dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
