The class NonCopyable is, like the name says, supposed to disallow
copying. But should it allow moving?
For a long time, NonCopyable used to not allow moving. (It declared
a deleted copy constructor and assigment operator without declaring
a move constructor and assignment operator, making the compiler
implicitly delete the move constructor and assignment operator.)
That's fine if the classes that inherit from NonCopyable don't need
to be movable or if writing the move constructor and assignment
operator by hand is fine, but that's not the case for all classes,
as I discovered when I was working on the DirectoryBlob PR.
Because of that, I decided to make NonCopyable movable in c7602cc,
allowing me to use NonCopyable in DirectoryBlob.h. That was however
an unfortunate decision, because some of the classes that inherit
from NonCopyable have incorrect behavior when moved by default-
generated move constructors and assignment operators, and do not
explicitly delete the move constructors and assignment operators,
relying on NonCopyable being non-movable.
So what can we do about this? There are four solutions that I can
think of:
1. Make NonCopyable non-movable and tell DirectoryBlob to suck it.
2. Keep allowing moving NonCopyable, and expect that classes that
don't support moving will delete the move constructor and
assignment operator manually. Not only is this inconsistent
(having classes disallow copying one way and disallow moving
another way), but deleting the move constructor and assignment
operator manually is too easy to forget compared to how tricky
the resulting problems are.
3. Have one "MovableNonCopyable" and one "NonMovableNonCopyable".
It works, but it feels rather silly...
4. Don't have a NonCopyable class at all. Considering that deleting
the copy constructor and assignment operator only takes two lines
of code, I don't see much of a reason to keep NonCopyable. I
suppose that there was more of a point in having NonCopyable back
in the pre-C++11 days, when it wasn't possible to use "= delete".
I decided to go with the fourth one (like the commit title says).
The implementation of the commit is fairly straight-forward, though
I would like to point out that I skipped adding "= delete" lines
for classes whose only reason for being uncopyable is that they
contain uncopyable classes like File::IOFile and std::unique_ptr,
because the compiler makes such classes uncopyable automatically.
Makes it easier to turn off general IOS messages that can be
distracting (e.g. /dev/net/ssl being opened hundreds of time...)
without losing the ability to view WFS messages.
This reimplements the USB HID v4 IOS device using the new common
USB code (to reuse more code and allow emulated HIDs to be added
more easily in the future).
The main difference is that HIDs now have to be whitelisted, like
every other USB device for OH0 and VEN.
Some structures will be reused and shared between several IOS USB
device implementations. This prepares for the upcoming USB PR.
I've also removed GetPointer calls in the trivial case (BT passthrough)
Using cmake and GCC, logs would contain the full file path when logging making logs lines unnecessarily long. This is solved by just removing anything before "/Source/Core/" (where / is whatever your OS uses to separated directory).
It didn't really made sense to disable 2 logs levels in releases builds while the level LDEBUG should really be where logs that would impact performance be. Info should be logs that report potentially usefull information and debug should report info that would only be usefull in debug context as they are called very often. To make this work, a lot of info log would have to be made debug log.
It also avoid inaccurate logs level done due to not using debug builds. While searching through the code, I saw a ton of logs that should have been info log, likely done to avoid using a debug build (which shouldn't happen considering the level debug exists anyway).
The whole idea is to have more meaningful logs in release builds while maintaining minimal performance loss from choosing the highest level. This could potentially help to diagnose issues or to know more about what the emulator is actually doing.
The next commit aims to sort the log levels for this purpose.
JosJuice
Léo Lam
ligfxandGitHub
Michael Maltese
Michael Maltese
aldelaro5
Pierre Bourdon
mathieui