Predict and serialize use-list order in bitcode. This makes the option
`-preserve-bc-use-list-order` work *most* of the time, but this is still
experimental.
- Builds a full value-table up front in the writer, sets up a list of
use-list orders to write out, and discards the table. This is a
simpler first step than determining the order from the various
overlapping IDs of values on-the-fly.
- The shuffles stored in the use-list order list have an unnecessarily
large memory footprint.
- `blockaddress` expressions cause functions to be materialized
out-of-order. For now I've ignored this problem, so use-list orders
will be wrong for constants used by functions that have block
addresses taken. There are a couple of ways to fix this, but I
don't have a concrete plan yet.
- When materializing functions lazily, the use-lists for constants
will not be correct. This use case is out of scope: what should the
use-list order be, if it's incomplete?
This is part of PR5680.
llvm-svn: 214125
This reverts commit r212342.
We can get a StringRef into the current Record, but not one in the bitcode
itself since the string is compressed in it.
llvm-svn: 212356
This new IR facility allows us to represent the object-file semantic of
a COMDAT group.
COMDATs allow us to tie together sections and make the inclusion of one
dependent on another. This is required to implement features like MS
ABI VFTables and optimizing away certain kinds of initialization in C++.
This functionality is only representable in COFF and ELF, Mach-O has no
similar mechanism.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4178
llvm-svn: 211920
This allows us to just use a std::unique_ptr to store the pointer to the buffer.
The flip side is that they have to support releasing the buffer back to the
caller.
Overall this looks like a more efficient and less brittle api.
llvm-svn: 211542
LLVMGetBitcodeModuleInContext should not take ownership on error. I will
try to localize this odd api requirement, but this should get the bots green.
llvm-svn: 211213
We do have use cases for the bitcode reader owning the buffer or not, but we
always know which one we have when we construct it.
It might be possible to simplify this further, but this is a step in the
right direction.
llvm-svn: 211205
This compiles with no changes to clang/lld/lldb with MSVC and includes
overloads to various functions which are used by those projects and llvm
which have OwningPtr's as parameters. This should allow out of tree
projects some time to move. There are also no changes to libs/Target,
which should help out of tree targets have time to move, if necessary.
llvm-svn: 203083
implementation already lived.
After this commit, the only IR-library headers in include/llvm/* are
ones related to the legacy pass infrastructure that I'm planning to
leave there until the new one is farther along.
The only other headers at the top level are linking and initialization
aids that aren't really libraries but just headers.
llvm-svn: 203069
Move the test for this class into the IR unittests as well.
This uncovers that ValueMap too is in the IR library. Ironically, the
unittest for ValueMap is useless in the Support library (honestly, so
was the ValueHandle test) and so it already lives in the IR unittests.
Mmmm, tasty layering.
llvm-svn: 202821
subsequent changes are easier to review. About to fix some layering
issues, and wanted to separate out the necessary churn.
Also comment and sink the include of "Windows.h" in three .inc files to
match the usage in Memory.inc.
llvm-svn: 198685
In order to create an ObjectFile implementation that uses bitcode files, we
need to propagate the bitcode errors to the ObjectFile interface, so we need
to convert it to use the same error handling as ObjectFile: error_code.
llvm-svn: 193996
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
Rafael Espindola
David Majnemer
Craig Topper
Ahmed Charles
Chandler Carruth
Manman Ren
Peter Collingbourne
Benjamin Kramer