can be used by both the new pass manager and the old.
This removes it from any of the virtual mess of the pass interfaces and
lets it derive cleanly from the DominatorTreeBase<> template. In turn,
tons of boilerplate interface can be nuked and it turns into a very
straightforward extension of the base DominatorTree interface.
The old analysis pass is now a simple wrapper. The names and style of
this split should match the split between CallGraph and
CallGraphWrapperPass. All of the users of DominatorTree have been
updated to match using many of the same tricks as with CallGraph. The
goal is that the common type remains the resulting DominatorTree rather
than the pass. This will make subsequent work toward the new pass
manager significantly easier.
Also in numerous places things became cleaner because I switched from
re-running the pass (!!! mid way through some other passes run!!!) to
directly recomputing the domtree.
llvm-svn: 199104
directory. These passes are already defined in the IR library, and it
doesn't make any sense to have the headers in Analysis.
Long term, I think there is going to be a much better way to divide
these matters. The dominators code should be fully separated into the
abstract graph algorithm and have that put in Support where it becomes
obvious that evn Clang's CFGBlock's can use it. Then the verifier can
manually construct dominance information from the Support-driven
interface while the Analysis library can provide a pass which both
caches, reconstructs, and supports a nice update API.
But those are very long term, and so I don't want to leave the really
confusing structure until that day arrives.
llvm-svn: 199082
When computing the use set of a store, we need to add the store to the write
set prior to iterating over later instructions. Otherwise, if there is a later
aliasing load of that store, that load will not be tagged as a use, and bad
things will happen.
trackUsesOfI still adds later dependent stores of an instruction to that
instruction's write set, but it never sees the original instruction, and so
when tracking uses of a store, the store must be added to the write set by the
caller.
Fixes PR16834.
llvm-svn: 188329
This fixes PR15289. This bug was introduced (recently) in r175215; collecting
all std::vector references for candidate pairs to delete at once is invalid
because subsequent lookups in the owning DenseMap could invalidate the
references.
bugpoint was able to reduce a useful test case. Unfortunately, because whether
or not this asserts depends on memory layout, this test case will sometimes
appear to produce valid output. Nevertheless, running under valgrind will
reveal the error.
llvm-svn: 175397
Several functions and variable names used the term 'tree' to refer
to what is actually a DAG. Correcting this mistake will, hopefully,
prevent confusion in the future.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 175278
For some basic blocks, it is possible to generate many candidate pairs for
relatively few pairable instructions. When many (tens of thousands) of these pairs
are generated for a single instruction group, the time taken to generate and
rank the different vectorization plans can become quite large. As a result, we now
cap the number of candidate pairs within each instruction group. This is done by
closing out the group once the threshold is reached (set now at 3000 pairs).
Although this will limit the overall compile-time impact, this may not be the best
way to achieve this result. It might be better, for example, to prune excessive
candidate pairs after the fact the prevent the generation of short, but highly-connected
groups. We can experiment with this in the future.
This change reduces the overall compile-time slowdown of the csa.ll test case in
PR15222 to ~5x. If 5x is still considered too large, a lower limit can be
used as the default.
This represents a functionality change, but only for very large inputs
(thus, there is no regression test).
llvm-svn: 175251
All instances of std::multimap have now been replaced by
DenseMap<K, std::vector<V> >, and this yields a speedup of 5% on the
csa.ll test case from PR15222.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 175216
This is another commit on the road to removing std::multimap from
BBVectorize. This gives an ~1% speedup on the csa.ll test case
in PR15222.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 175215
When building the pairable-instruction dependency map, don't search
past the last pairable instruction. For large blocks that have been
divided into multiple instruction groups, searching past the last
instruction in each group is very wasteful. This gives a 32% speedup
on the csa.ll test case from PR15222 (when using 50 instructions
in each group).
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 174915
This map is queried only for instructions in pairs of pairable
instructions; so make sure that only pairs of pairable
instructions are added to the map. This gives a 3.5% speedup
on the csa.ll test case from PR15222.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 174914
This eliminates one more linear search over a range of
std::multimap entries. This gives a 22% speedup on the
csa.ll test case from PR15222.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 174893
This removes the last of the linear searches over ranges of std::multimap
iterators, giving a 7% speedup on the doduc.bc input from PR15222.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 174859
Profiling suggests that getInstructionTypes is performance-sensitive,
this cleans up some double-casting in that function in favor of
using dyn_cast.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 174857
By itself, this does not have much of an effect, but only because in the default
configuration the full cycle checks are used only for small problem sizes.
This is part of a general cleanup of uses of iteration over std::multimap
ranges only for the purpose of checking membership.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 174856
This is a follow-up to the cost-model change in r174713 which splits
the cost of a memory operation between the address computation and the
actual memory access. In r174713, this cost is always added to the
memory operation cost, and so BBVectorize will do the same.
Currently, this new cost function is used only by ARM, and I don't
have any ARM test cases for BBVectorize. Assistance in generating some
good ARM test cases for BBVectorize would be greatly appreciated!
llvm-svn: 174743
When flipping the pair of subvectors that form a vector, if the
vector length is 2, we can use the SK_Reverse shuffle kind to get
more-accurate cost information. Also we can use the SK_ExtractSubvector
shuffle kind to get accurate subvector extraction costs.
The current cost model implementations don't yet seem complex enough
for this to make a difference (thus, there are no test cases with this
commit), but it should help in future.
Depending on how the various targets optimize and combine shuffles in
practice, we might be able to get more-accurate costs by combining the
costs of multiple shuffle kinds. For example, the cost of flipping the
subvector pairs could be modeled as two extractions and two subvector
insertions. These changes, however, should probably be motivated
by specific test cases.
llvm-svn: 173621
Chandler Carruth
Matt Arsenault
Robert Wilhelm
Hal Finkel
Craig Topper