If a local_unnamed_addr attribute is attached to a global, the address
is known to be insignificant within the module. It is distinct from the
existing unnamed_addr attribute in that it only describes a local property
of the module rather than a global property of the symbol.
This attribute is intended to be used by the code generator and LTO to allow
the linker to decide whether the global needs to be in the symbol table. It is
possible to exclude a global from the symbol table if three things are true:
- This attribute is present on every instance of the global (which means that
the normal rule that the global must have a unique address can be broken without
being observable by the program by performing comparisons against the global's
address)
- The global has linkonce_odr linkage (which means that each linkage unit must have
its own copy of the global if it requires one, and the copy in each linkage unit
must be the same)
- It is a constant or a function (which means that the program cannot observe that
the unique-address rule has been broken by writing to the global)
Although this attribute could in principle be computed from the module
contents, LTO clients (i.e. linkers) will normally need to be able to compute
this property as part of symbol resolution, and it would be inefficient to
materialize every module just to compute it.
See:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160509/356401.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160516/356738.html
for earlier discussion.
Part of the fix for PR27553.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20348
llvm-svn: 272709
This means that LTO_SYMBOL_SCOPE_DEFAULT_CAN_BE_HIDDEN will not be set
in a few cases.
This should have no impact in ld64 since it doesn't use lazy loading
when merging modules and that is when it checks
LTO_SYMBOL_SCOPE_DEFAULT_CAN_BE_HIDDEN.
llvm-svn: 257915
Remove a few more implicit ilist iterator conversions, this time from
Analysis.cpp and BranchFolding.cpp.
I added a few overloads for `remove()` and `erase()`, which quite
naturally take pointers as well as iterators as parameters. This will
reduce the churn at least in the short term, but I don't really have a
problem with these existing for longer.
llvm-svn: 249867
The CATCHRET operand did not match the MachineFunction's CFG. This
mismatch happened because FrameLowering created a new MachineBasicBlock
and updated the CFG but forgot to update the CATCHRET operand.
Let's make sure this doesn't happen again by strengthing the funclet
membership analysis: it can now reason about the membership of all basic
blocks, not just those inside of funclets.
llvm-svn: 249344
Track which basic blocks belong to which funclets. Permit branch
folding to fire but only if it can prove that doing so will not cause
code in one funclet to be reused in another.
llvm-svn: 249257
This reverts isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute's use of ReadNone until we
split ReadNone into two pieces: one attribute which reasons about how
the function reasons about memory and another attribute which determines
how it may be speculated, CSE'd, trap, etc.
llvm-svn: 246331
A readnone tailcall may still have a chain of computation which follows
it that would invalidate a tailcall lowering. Don't skip the analysis
in such cases.
This fixes PR24613.
llvm-svn: 246304
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, ted, yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11028
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241775
Summary:
Avoid using the TargetMachine owned DataLayout and use the Module owned
one instead. This requires passing the DataLayout up the stack to
ComputeValueVTs().
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11019
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241773
It's quite possible to encounter an insertvalue instruction that's more deeply
nested than the value we're looking for, but when that happens we really
mustn't compare beyond the end of the index array.
Since I couldn't see any guarantees about what comparisons std::equal makes, we
probably need to directly check the size beforehand. In practice, I suspect
most std::equal implementations would probably bail early, which would be OK.
But just in case...
rdar://20834485
llvm-svn: 236635
When deciding whether a value comes from the aggregate or inserted value of an
insertvalue instruction, we compare the indices against those of the location
we're interested in. One of the lists needs reversing because the input data is
backwards (so that modifications take place at the end of the SmallVector), but
we were reversing both before leading to incorrect results.
Should fix PR23408
llvm-svn: 236457
All of the cases were just appending from random access iterators to a
vector. Using insert/append can grow the vector to the perfect size
directly and moves the growing out of the loop. No intended functionalty
change.
llvm-svn: 230845
When processing an array, every Elt has the same layout, it is
useless to recursively call each ComputeLinearIndex on each element.
Just do it once and multiply by the number of elements.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6832
llvm-svn: 225949
There is no need to pass on TLI separately to the function. As Eric pointed out
the Target Machine already provides everything we need.
llvm-svn: 213108
Peter Collingbourne
Rafael Espindola
Benjamin Kramer
David Majnemer
David Blaikie
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
Mehdi Amini
Tim Northover
Eric Christopher
Reid Kleckner
Juergen Ributzka