Summary:
The StringExtractor functions using stroull will already
skip leading whitespace (ie GetU64). Make sure that the manual
hex parsing functions also skip leading whitespace.
This is important for members of the gdb protocol which are defined
as using whitespace separators (ie qfThreadInfo, qC, etc). While
lldb-server does not use the whitespace separators, gdb-remotes
should work if they do, as the whitespace is defined by the gdb-remote
protocol.
Reviewers: vharron, jasonmolenda, clayborg
Subscribers: sas, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20509
llvm-svn: 270592
This is a pretty straightforward first pass over removing a number of uses of
Mutex in favor of std::mutex or std::recursive_mutex. The problem is that there
are interfaces which take Mutex::Locker & to lock internal locks. This patch
cleans up most of the easy cases. The only non-trivial change is in
CommandObjectTarget.cpp where a Mutex::Locker was split into two.
llvm-svn: 269877
Summary:
Doing a pthread_detach while the thread is exiting can cause crashes or other mischief, so we
make sure the thread stays around long enough. The performance impact of the added
synchronization should be minimal, as the parent thread is already holding a mutex, so I am just
making sure it holds it for a little while longer. It's possible the new thread will block on
this mutex immediately after startup, but it should be unblocked really quickly and some
blocking is unavoidable if we actually want to have this synchronization.
Reviewers: tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19153
llvm-svn: 266423
rnb_err_t
RNBRemote::HandlePacket_stop_process (const char *p)
{
if (!DNBProcessInterrupt(m_ctx.ProcessID()))
HandlePacket_last_signal (NULL);
return rnb_success;
}
In the call to DNBProcessInterrupt we did:
nub_bool_t
DNBProcessInterrupt(nub_process_t pid)
{
MachProcessSP procSP;
if (GetProcessSP (pid, procSP))
return procSP->Interrupt();
return false;
}
This would always return false. It would cause HandlePacket_stop_process to always call "HandlePacket_last_signal (NULL);" which would send an extra stop reply packet _if_ the process is stopped. On a machine with enough cores, it would call DNBProcessInterrupt(...) and then HandlePacket_last_signal(NULL) so quickly that it will never send out an extra stop reply packet. But if the machine is slow enough or doesn't have enough cores, it could cause the call to HandlePacket_last_signal() to actually succeed and send an extra stop reply packet. This would cause problems up in GDBRemoteCommunicationClient::SendContinuePacketAndWaitForResponse() where it would get the first stop reply packet and then possibly return or execute an async packet. If it returned, then the next packet that was sent will get the second stop reply as its response. If it executes an async packet, the async packet will get the wrong response.
To fix this I did the following:
1 - in debugserver, I fixed "bool MachProcess::Interrupt()" to return true if it sends the signal so we avoid sending the stop reply twice on slower machines
2 - Added a log line to RNBRemote::HandlePacket_stop_process() to say if we ever send an extra stop reply so we will see this in the darwin console output if this does happen
3 - Added response validators to StringExtractorGDBRemote so that we can verify some responses to some packets.
4 - Added validators to packets that often follow stop reply packets like the "m" packet for memory reads, JSON packets since "jThreadsInfo" is often sent immediately following a stop reply.
5 - Modified GDBRemoteCommunicationClient::SendPacketAndWaitForResponseNoLock() to validate responses. Any "StringExtractorGDBRemote &response" that contains a valid response verifier will verify the response and keep looking for correct responses up to 3 times. This will help us get back on track if we do get extra stop replies. If a StringExtractorGDBRemote does not have a response validator, it will accept any packet in response.
6 - In GDBRemoteCommunicationClient::SendPacketAndWaitForResponse we copy the response validator from the "response" argument over into m_async_response so that if we send the packet by interrupting the running process, we can validate the response we actually get in GDBRemoteCommunicationClient::SendContinuePacketAndWaitForResponse()
7 - Modified GDBRemoteCommunicationClient::SendContinuePacketAndWaitForResponse() to always check for an extra stop reply packet for 100ms when the process is interrupted. We were already doing this because we might interrupt a process with a \x03 packet, yet the process was in the process of stopping due to another reason. This race condition could cause an extra stop reply packet because the GDB remote protocol says if a \x03 packet is sent while the process is stopped, we should send a stop reply packet back. Now we always check for an extra stop reply packet when we manually interrupt a process.
The issue was showing up when our IDE would attempt to set a breakpoint while the process is running and this would happen:
--> \x03
<-- $T<stop reply 1>
--> z0,AAAAA,BB (set breakpoint)
<-- $T<stop reply 1> (incorrect extra stop reply packet)
--> c
<-- OK (response from z0 packet)
Now all packet traffic was off by one response. Since we now have a validator on the response for "z" packets, we do this:
--> \x03
<-- $T<stop reply 1>
--> z0,AAAAA,BB (set breakpoint)
<-- $T<stop reply 1> (Ignore this because this can't be the response to z0 packets)
<-- OK -- (we are back on track as this is a valid response to z0)
...
As time goes on we should add more packet validators.
<rdar://problem/22859505>
llvm-svn: 265086
Most address represented in lldb as section plus offset and handling of
absolute addresses is problematic in several location because of lack
of necessary information (e.g. Target) or because of performance issues.
This CL change the way ObjectFileELF handle the absolute symbols with
creating a pseudo section for each symbol. With this change all existing
code designed to work with addresses in the form of section plus offset
will work with absolute symbols as well.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17450
llvm-svn: 261859
Summary:
DWARF 5 proposes a reinvented .debug_macro section. This change follows
that spec.
Currently, only GCC produces the .debug_macro section and hence
the added test is annottated with expectedFailureClang.
Reviewers: spyffe, clayborg, tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15437
llvm-svn: 255729
Adding the modules to the global module list eleminate issues in the
case when a module is unloaded from the target but some object (e.g.
breakpoint) still referencing them with weak pointers. It also speeds
up the case when we load, unload, load the same shared library because
the global module cache will keep the parsed debug info around between
the 2 load (this scenario happens for some code on android).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15415
llvm-svn: 255260
The standard remote debugging workflow with gdb is to start the
application on the remote host under gdbserver (e.g.: gdbserver :5039
a.out) and then connect to it with gdb.
The same workflow is supported by debugserver/lldb-gdbserver with a very
similar syntax but to access all features of lldb we need to be
connected also to an lldb-platform instance running on the target.
Before this change this had to be done manually with starting a separate
lldb-platform on the target machine and then connecting to it with lldb
before connecting to the process.
This change modifies the behavior of "platform connect" with
automatically connecting to the process instance if it was started by
the remote platform. With this command replacing gdbserver in a gdb
based worflow is usually as simple as replacing the command to execute
gdbserver with executing lldb-platform.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14952
llvm-svn: 255016
* Add support for representing signed integers
* Add new constructors taking any signed or unsigned integer types
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15187
llvm-svn: 254715
The purpose of the class is to make it easy to execute tasks in parallel
Basic design goals:
* Have a very lightweight and easy to use interface where a list of
lambdas can be executed in parallel
* Use a global thread pool to limit the number of threads used
(std::async don't do it on Linux) and to eliminate the thread creation
overhead
* Destroy the thread currently not in use to avoid the confusion caused
by them during debugging LLDB
Possible future improvements:
* Possibility to cancel already added, but not yet started tasks
* Parallel for_each implementation
* Optimizations in the thread creation destroyation code
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13727
llvm-svn: 250820
Summary:
This commit adds support for binary memory reads ($x) to lldb-server. It also removes the "0x"
prefix from the $x client packet, to make it more compatible with the old $m packet. This allows
us to use almost the same code for handling both packet types. I have verified that debugserver
correctly handles $x packets even without the leading "0x". I have added a test which verifies
that the stub returns the same memory contents for both kinds of memory reads ($x and $m).
Reviewers: tberghammer, jasonmolenda
Subscribers: iancottrell, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13695
llvm-svn: 250295
.ARM.exidx/.ARM.extab sections contain unwind information used on ARM
architecture from unwinding from an exception.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13245
llvm-svn: 248903
Character with ASCII code 0 is incorrectly treated by LLDB as the end of
RSP packet. The left of the debugger server output is silently ignored.
Patch from evgeny.leviant@gmail.com
Reviewed by: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12523
llvm-svn: 247908
The Go runtime schedules user level threads (goroutines) across real threads.
This adds an OS plugin to create memory threads for goroutines.
It supports the 1.4 and 1.5 go runtime.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5871
llvm-svn: 247852
"gcc" register numbers are now correctly referred to as "ehframe"
register numbers. In almost all cases, ehframe and dwarf register
numbers are identical (the one exception is i386 darwin where ehframe
regnums were incorrect).
The old "gdb" register numbers, which I incorrectly thought were
stabs register numbers, are now referred to as "Process Plugin"
register numbers. This is the register numbering scheme that the
remote process controller stub (lldb-server, gdbserver, core file
support, kdp server, remote jtag devices, etc) uses to refer to the
registers. The process plugin register numbers may not be contiguous
- there are remote jtag devices that have gaps in their register
numbering schemes.
I removed all of the enums for "gdb" register numbers that we had
in lldb - these were meaningless - and I put LLDB_INVALID_REGNUM
in all of the register tables for the Process Plugin regnum slot.
This change is almost entirely mechnical; the one actual change in
here is to ProcessGDBRemote.cpp's ParseRegisters() which parses the
qXfer:features:read:target.xml response. As it parses register
definitions from the xml, it will assign sequential numbers as the
eRegisterKindLLDB numbers (the lldb register numberings must be
sequential, without any gaps) and if the xml file specifies register
numbers, those will be used as the eRegisterKindProcessPlugin
register numbers (and those may have gaps). A J-Link jtag device's
target.xml does contain a gap in register numbers, and it only
specifies the register numbers for the registers after that gap.
The device supports many different ARM boards and probably selects
different part of its register file as appropriate.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12791
<rdar://problem/22623262>
llvm-svn: 247741
Summary:
This doesn't exist in other LLVM projects any longer and doesn't
do anything.
Reviewers: chaoren, labath
Subscribers: emaste, tberghammer, lldb-commits, danalbert
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12586
llvm-svn: 246749
Summary:
When calling find_first_of and find_last_of on a single character,
we can instead just call find / rfind and make our intent more
clear.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12518
llvm-svn: 246609
Francis Ricci
Oleksiy Vyalov
Saleem Abdulrasool
Jim Ingham
Pavel Labath
Greg Clayton
Tamas Berghammer
Eugene Zelenko
Siva Chandra
Omair Javaid
Dawn Perchik
Ryan Brown
Jason Molenda
Bruce Mitchener