If we have a TargetLoadAddress on the top of the DWARF stack then a
DW_OP_plus or a DW_OP_plus_ucons sholudn't dereference (resolve) it
and then add the value to the dereferenced value but it should offset
the load address by the specified constant.
llvm-svn: 262339
Additionally fix the type of some dwarf expression where we had a
confusion between scalar and load address types after a dereference.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17604
llvm-svn: 262014
There are still a bunch of dependencies on the plug-in, but this helps to
identify them.
There are also a few more bits we need to move (and abstract, for example the
ClangPersistentVariables).
llvm-svn: 248612
Split-dwarf uses a different header format to specify the address range
for the elements of the location lists.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12880
llvm-svn: 247789
Summary:
When lldb is processing a location containing DW_OP_piece, the result is being
stored in the 'pieces' variable. The location is popped from the 'stack' variable.
So this check to see that 'stack' is not empty was invalid and caused the pieces
after the first to not get processed.
I am working on an architecture which has 16-bit and 8-bit registers. So this
problem was quite easy to see. But I was able to re-produce this issue on x86
too with long long variable and compiling woth -m32. It resulted in following
location list.
00000014 08048496 080484b5 (DW_OP_reg6 (esi); DW_OP_piece: 4; DW_OP_reg7 (edi); DW_OP_piece: 4)
and lldb was only showing the contents of first register when I evaluated the
variable as it does not process the 2nd piece due to this check.
Reviewers: clayborg, aprantl
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12674
llvm-svn: 247124
This is still something I need to fix, but at least it's not so ugly, and it's
consistent with the other code that does that so we will catch it when we purge
all such code.
llvm-svn: 246738
Clang-specific part, create the ExpressionVariable source/header file and
move ClangExpressionVariable into the Clang expression parser plugin.
It is expected that there are some ugly #include paths... these will be resolved
by either (1) making that code use generic expression variables (once they're
separated appropriately) or (2) moving that code into a plug-in, often
the expression parser plug-in.
llvm-svn: 246737
So that we don't have to update every single #include in the entire
codebase to #include this new header (which used to get included by
lldb-private-log.h, we automatically #include "Logging.h" from
within "Log.h".
llvm-svn: 232653
operator in addition to the vendor-extension DW_OP_GNU_push_tls_address.
clang on PS4 and Darwin will be emitting the standard opcode
as of r231286 via http://reviews.llvm.org/D8018
Behavior of this standard opcode is the same as
DW_OP_GNU_push_tls_address.
<rdar://problem/20043195>
llvm-svn: 231342
DW_OP_fbreg(N) DW_OP_piece(4) DW_OP_fbreg(M) DW_OP_piece(8)
DW_OP_fbreg(N) DW_OP_piece(4) DW_OP_piece(8)
The first grabs 4 bytes from FP+N followed by 8 bytes from FP+M, the second grabs 4 bytes from FP+N followed by zero filling 8 bytes which are unavailable. Of course regiters are stuff supported:
DW_OP_reg3 DW_OP_piece(4) DW_OP_reg8 DW_OP_piece(8)
The fix does the following:
1 - don't push the full piece value onto the stack, keep it on the side
2 - fill zeros for DW_OP_piece(N) opcodes that have nothing on the stack (instead of previously consuming the full piece that was pushed onto the stack)
3 - simplify the logic
<rdar://problem/16930524>
llvm-svn: 214415
Tamas Berghammer
Sean Callanan
Hafiz Abid Qadeer
Zachary Turner
Jason Molenda
Greg Clayton
Eric Christopher
Enrico Granata
Ed Maste
Jean-Daniel Dupas