The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
Clean up the __has_attribute implementation without modifying its behavior.
Replaces the tablegen-driven AttrSpellings.inc, which lived in the lexing layer with AttrHasAttributeImpl.inc, which lives in the basic layer. Updates the preprocessor to call through to this new functionality which can take additional information into account (such as scopes and syntaxes).
Expose the ability for parts of the compiler to ask whether an attribute is supported for a given spelling (including scope), syntax, triple and language options.
llvm-svn: 205181
Replaces the tablegen-driven AttrSpellings.inc, which lived in the lexing layer with AttrHasAttributeImpl.inc, which lives in the basic layer. Updates the preprocessor to call through to this new functionality which can take additional information into account (such as scopes and syntaxes).
Expose the ability for parts of the compiler to ask whether an attribute is supported for a given spelling (including scope), syntax, triple and language options.
llvm-svn: 204952
This patch adds some very, very sparse initial documentation for some attributes. Additional effort from attribute authors is greatly appreciated.
llvm-svn: 201515
To declare or define reserved identifers is undefined behaviour in standard
C++. This needs to be addressed in compiler-rt before it can be used in LLVM.
See the list discussion for details.
This reverts commit r198858.
llvm-svn: 198885
important for thread safety attributes, which contain expressions that were
not being visited, and were thus invisible to various tools. There are now
Visit*Attr methods that can be overridden for every attribute.
llvm-svn: 198224
which we don't think can't have one, only allow it in the tiny number of
attributes which opts into this weird parse rule.
I've manually checked that the handlers for all these attributes can in fact
cope with an identifier as the argument. This is still somewhat terrible; we
should move more fully towards picking the parsing rules based on the
attribute, and make the Parse -> Sema interface more type-safe.
llvm-svn: 193295
The CMake build was still using it because I forgot to s/CLANG/LLVM/ in
the tablegen() call. The Makefile build is already using llvm-tblgen.
llvm-svn: 184192
This change partly addresses a heinous problem we have with the
parsing of attribute arguments that are a lone identifier. Previously,
we would end up parsing the 'align' attribute of this as an expression
"(Align)":
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align((Align)))) char storage[Size];
};
while this would parse as a "parameter name" 'Align':
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align(Align))) char storage[Size];
};
The code that handles the alignment attribute would completely ignore
the parameter name, so the while the first of these would do what's
expected, the second would silently be equivalent to
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align)) char storage[Size];
};
i.e., use the maximal alignment rather than the specified alignment.
Address this by sniffing the "Args" provided in the TableGen
description of attributes. If the first argument is "obviously"
something that should be treated as an expression (rather than an
identifier to be matched later), parse it as an expression.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13700933>.
llvm-svn: 180973
This change partly addresses a heinous problem we have with the
parsing of attribute arguments that are a lone identifier. Previously,
we would end up parsing the 'align' attribute of this as an expression
"(Align)":
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align((Align)))) char storage[Size];
};
while this would parse as a "parameter name" 'Align':
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align(Align))) char storage[Size];
};
The code that handles the alignment attribute would completely ignore
the parameter name, so the while the first of these would do what's
expected, the second would silently be equivalent to
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align)) char storage[Size];
};
i.e., use the maximal alignment rather than the specified alignment.
Address this by sniffing the "Args" provided in the TableGen
description of attributes. If the first argument is "obviously"
something that should be treated as an expression (rather than an
identifier to be matched later), parse it as an expression.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13700933>.
llvm-svn: 180970
Richard Smith
Craig Topper
Alexander Kornienko
Aaron Ballman
Kostya Serebryany
Alp Toker
DeLesley Hutchins
Rafael Espindola
Reid Kleckner
Douglas Gregor