This reverts commit r193161.
It broke
void foo() __attribute__((alias("bar")));
void bar() {}
void zed() __attribute__((alias("foo")));
Looks like we have to fix pr17639 first :-(
llvm-svn: 193162
names. For example, with this patch we now reject
void f1(void) __attribute__((alias("g1")));
This patch is implemented in CodeGen. It is quiet a bit simpler and more
compatible with gcc than implementing it in Sema. The downside is that the
errors only fire during -emit-llvm.
llvm-svn: 193161
An updated version of r191586 with bug fix.
Struct-path aware TBAA generates tags to specify the access path,
while scalar TBAA only generates tags to scalar types.
We should not generate a TBAA tag with null being the first field. When
a TBAA type node is null, the tag should be null too. Make sure we
don't decorate an instruction with a null TBAA tag.
Added a testing case for the bug reported by Richard with -relaxed-aliasing
and -fsanitizer=thread.
llvm-svn: 192145
A quirk of AST representation leads to class template static data member
definitions being visited twice during Clang IRGen resulting in
duplicate (benign) initializers.
Discovered while investigating a possibly-related debug info bug tickled
by the duplicate emission of these members & their associated debug
info.
With thanks to Richard Smith for help investigating, understanding, and
helping with the fix.
llvm-svn: 189996
Refactor the underlying code a bit to remove unnecessary calls to
"hasErrorOccurred" & make them consistently at all the entry points to
the IRGen ASTConsumer.
llvm-svn: 188707
Summary:
We would crash in CodeGen::CodeGenModule::EmitUuidofInitializer
because our attempt to enter CodeGen::CodeGenModule::EmitConstantValue
will be foiled: the type of the constant value is incomplete.
Instead, create an unnamed type with the proper layout on all platforms.
Punt the problem of wrongly defined struct _GUID types to the user.
(It's impossible because the TU may never get to see the type and thus
we can't verify that it is suitable.)
This fixes PR16856.
Reviewers: rsmith, rnk, thakis
Reviewed By: rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1375
llvm-svn: 188481
Summary:
It seems that __uuidof introduces a global extern "C" declaration of
type __s_GUID. However, our implementation of __uuidof does not provide
such a declaration and thus must open-code the mangling for __uuidof in
template parameters.
This allows us to codegen scoped COM pointers and other such things.
This fixes PR16836.
Depends on D1356.
Reviewers: rnk, cdavis5x, rsmith
Reviewed By: rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1357
llvm-svn: 188252
We mangled them like:
L___uuid_12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc
We should've mangled them like:
__GUID_12345678_1234_1234_1234_123456789abc
Furthermore, they are external symbols.
llvm-svn: 188053
Based on Peter Collingbourne's destructor patches.
Prior to this change, clang was considering ?1 to be the complete
destructor and the base destructor, which was wrong. This lead to
crashes when clang tried to emit two LLVM functions with the same name.
In this ABI, TUs with non-inline dtors might not emit a complete
destructor. They are emitted as inline thunks in TUs that need them,
and they always delegate to the base dtors of the complete class and its
virtual bases. This change uses the DeferredDecls machinery to emit
complete dtors as needed.
Currently in clang try body destructors can catch exceptions thrown by
virtual base destructors. In the Microsoft C++ ABI, clang may not have
the destructor definition, in which case clang won't wrap the virtual
virtual base destructor calls in a try-catch. Diagnosing this in user
code is TODO.
Finally, for classes that don't use virtual inheritance, MSVC always
calls the base destructor (?1) directly. This is a useful code size
optimization that avoids emitting lots of extra thunks or aliases.
Implementing it also means our existing tests continue to pass, and is
consistent with MSVC's output.
We can do the same for Itanium by tweaking GetAddrOfCXXDestructor, but
it will require further testing.
Reviewers: rjmccall
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1066
llvm-svn: 186828
optimize, to follow the permissions granted in N3664. Under those rules, only
calls generated by new-expressions and delete-expressions are permitted to be
optimized, and direct calls to ::operator new and ::operator delete must be
treated as normal calls.
llvm-svn: 186799
The key insight here is that weak linkage for a static local variable
should always mean linkonce_odr, because every file that needs it will
generate a definition. We don't actually care about the precise linkage
of the parent context. I feel a bit silly that I didn't realize this before.
llvm-svn: 185381
Blocks, like lambdas, can be written in contexts which are required to be
treated as the same under ODR. Unlike lambdas, it isn't possible to actually
take the address of a block, so the mangling of the block itself doesn't
matter. However, objects like static variables inside a block do need to
be mangled in a consistent way.
There are basically three components here. One, block literals need a
consistent numbering. Two, objects/types inside a block literal need
to be mangled using it. Three, objects/types inside a block literal need
to have their linkage computed correctly.
llvm-svn: 185372