Commit Graph

608 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mehdi Amini b0a8ff71e5 [ThinLTO] Add an auto-hide feature
When a symbol is not exported outside of the
DSO, it is can be hidden. Usually we try to internalize
as much as possible, but it is not always possible, for
instance a symbol can be referenced outside of the LTO
unit, or there can be cross-module reference in ThinLTO.

This is a recommit of r293912 after fixing build failures,
and a recommit of r293918 after fixing LLD tests.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28978

llvm-svn: 293970
2017-02-03 00:32:38 +00:00
Mehdi Amini 21c89dc920 Revert "[ThinLTO] Add an auto-hide feature"
This reverts commit r293918, one lld test does not pass.

llvm-svn: 293961
2017-02-02 23:20:36 +00:00
Mehdi Amini 97624fb1ec [ThinLTO] Add an auto-hide feature
When a symbol is not exported outside of the
DSO, it is can be hidden. Usually we try to internalize
as much as possible, but it is not always possible, for
instance a symbol can be referenced outside of the LTO
unit, or there can be cross-module reference in ThinLTO.

This is a recommit of r293912 after fixing build failures.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28978

llvm-svn: 293918
2017-02-02 18:31:35 +00:00
Mehdi Amini 827600deaf Revert "[ThinLTO] Add an auto-hide feature"
This reverts r293912, bots are broken.

llvm-svn: 293914
2017-02-02 18:24:37 +00:00
Mehdi Amini dc5a7444f0 [ThinLTO] Add an auto-hide feature
When a symbol is not exported outside of the
DSO, it is can be hidden. Usually we try to internalize
as much as possible, but it is not always possible, for
instance a symbol can be referenced outside of the LTO
unit, or there can be cross-module reference in ThinLTO.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28978

llvm-svn: 293912
2017-02-02 18:13:46 +00:00
Dehao Chen 0944a8c2ec Change debug-info-for-profiling from a TargetOption to a function attribute.
Summary: LTO requires the debug-info-for-profiling to be a function attribute.

Reviewers: echristo, mehdi_amini, dblaikie, probinson, aprantl

Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, dblaikie, aprantl

Subscribers: aprantl, probinson, ahatanak, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29203

llvm-svn: 293833
2017-02-01 22:45:09 +00:00
Teresa Johnson 6c475a7595 ThinLTO: add early "dead-stripping" on the Index
Summary:
Using the linker-supplied list of "preserved" symbols, we can compute
the list of "dead" symbols, i.e. the one that are not reachable from
a "preserved" symbol transitively on the reference graph.
Right now we are using this information to mark these functions as
non-eligible for import.

The impact is two folds:
- Reduction of compile time: we don't import these functions anywhere
  or import the function these symbols are calling.
- The limited number of import/export leads to better internalization.

Patch originally by Mehdi Amini.

Reviewers: mehdi_amini, pcc

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23488

llvm-svn: 291177
2017-01-05 21:34:18 +00:00
Teresa Johnson 519465b993 [ThinLTO] Subsume all importing checks into a single flag
Summary:
This adds a new summary flag NotEligibleToImport that subsumes
several existing flags (NoRename, HasInlineAsmMaybeReferencingInternal
and IsNotViableToInline). It also subsumes the checking of references
on the summary that was being done during the thin link by
eligibleForImport() for each candidate. It is much more efficient to
do that checking once during the per-module summary build and record
it in the summary.

Reviewers: mehdi_amini

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28169

llvm-svn: 291108
2017-01-05 14:32:16 +00:00
David Blaikie 7ad9dc11db Reapply "Make BitCodeAbbrev ownership explicit using shared_ptr rather than IntrusiveRefCntPtr""
If this is a problem for anyone (shared_ptr is two pointers in size,
whereas IntrusiveRefCntPtr is 1 - and the ref count control block that
make_shared adds is probably larger than the one int in RefCountedBase)
I'd prefer to address this by adding a lower-overhead version of
shared_ptr (possibly refactoring IntrusiveRefCntPtr into such a thing)
to avoid the intrusiveness - this allows memory ownership to remain
orthogonal to types and at least to me, seems to make code easier to
understand (since no implicit ownership acquisition can happen).

This recommits 291006, reverted in r291007.

llvm-svn: 291016
2017-01-04 22:36:33 +00:00
David Blaikie 6e2207a134 Revert "Make BitCodeAbbrev ownership explicit using shared_ptr rather than IntrusiveRefCntPtr"
Breaks Clang's use of bitcode. Reverting until I have a fix to go with
it there.

This reverts commit r291006.

llvm-svn: 291007
2017-01-04 21:19:28 +00:00
David Blaikie daff78cd87 Make BitCodeAbbrev ownership explicit using shared_ptr rather than IntrusiveRefCntPtr
If this is a problem for anyone (shared_ptr is two pointers in size,
whereas IntrusiveRefCntPtr is 1 - and the ref count control block that
make_shared adds is probably larger than the one int in RefCountedBase)
I'd prefer to address this by adding a lower-overhead version of
shared_ptr (possibly refactoring IntrusiveRefCntPtr into such a thing)
to avoid the intrusiveness - this allows memory ownership to remain
orthogonal to types and at least to me, seems to make code easier to
understand (since no implicit ownership acquisition can happen).

llvm-svn: 291006
2017-01-04 21:13:35 +00:00
Mehdi Amini 5022bb7238 Change Metadata Index emission in the bitcode to use 2x32 bits for the placeholder
The Bitstream reader and writer are limited to handle a "size_t" at
most, which means that we can't backpatch and read back a 64bits
value on 32 bits platform.

llvm-svn: 290693
2016-12-28 23:45:54 +00:00
Mehdi Amini e98f925834 Add an index for Module Metadata record in the bitcode
This index record the position for each metadata record in
the bitcode, so that the reader will be able to lazy-load
on demand each individual record.

We also make sure that every abbrev is emitted upfront so
that the block can be skipped while reading.

I don't plan to commit this before having the reader
counterpart, but I figured this can be reviewed mostly
independently.

Recommit r290684 (was reverted in r290686 because a test
was broken) after adding a threshold to avoid emitting
the index when unnecessary (little amount of metadata).
This optimization "hides" a limitation of the ability
to backpatch in the bitstream: we can only backpatch
safely when the position has been flushed. So if we emit
an index for one metadata, it is possible that (part of)
the offset placeholder hasn't been flushed and the backpatch
will fail.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28083

llvm-svn: 290690
2016-12-28 22:30:28 +00:00
Saleem Abdulrasool 2b59eca1f7 Revert "Add an index for Module Metadata record in the bitcode"
This reverts commit a0ca6ae2d38339e4ede0dfa588086fc23d87e836.  Revert at
Mehdi's request as it is breaking bots.

llvm-svn: 290686
2016-12-28 20:37:22 +00:00
Mehdi Amini 32ca148198 Add an index for Module Metadata record in the bitcode
Summary:
This index record the position for each metadata record in
the bitcode, so that the reader will be able to lazy-load
on demand each individual record.

We also make sure that every abbrev is emitted upfront so
that the block can be skipped while reading.

I don't plan to commit this before having the reader
counterpart, but I figured this can be reviewed mostly
independently.

Reviewers: pcc, tejohnson

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28083

llvm-svn: 290684
2016-12-28 19:44:19 +00:00
Amjad Aboud 7faeecc8f7 [DebugInfo] Added support for Checksum debug info feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27642

llvm-svn: 290514
2016-12-25 10:12:09 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 1b4137a7f9 IR: Function summary representation for type tests.
Each function summary has an attached list of type identifier GUIDs. The
idea is that during the regular LTO phase we would match these GUIDs to type
identifiers defined by the regular LTO module and store the resolutions in
a top-level "type identifier summary" (which will be implemented separately).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27967

llvm-svn: 290280
2016-12-21 23:03:45 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 0c30f089d5 IR: Eliminate non-determinism in the module summary analysis.
Also make the summary ref and call graph vectors immutable. This means
a smaller API surface and fewer places to audit for non-determinism.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27875

llvm-svn: 290200
2016-12-20 21:12:28 +00:00
Adrian Prantl bceaaa9643 [IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
    not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
    replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
    more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
    DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s).  We also moved away from attaching the
    DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades and a change
to the Bitcode record for DIGlobalVariable, that makes upgrading the
old format unambiguous also for variables without DIExpressions.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 290153
2016-12-20 02:09:43 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 73ec065604 Revert "[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable."
This reverts commit 289920 (again).
I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable
has not DIExpression. Unfortunately it is not possible to safely upgrade
these variables without adding a flag to the bitcode record indicating which
version they are.
My plan of record is to roll the planned follow-up patch that adds a
unit: field to DIGlobalVariable into this patch before recomitting.
This way we only need one Bitcode upgrade for both changes (with a
version flag in the bitcode record to safely distinguish the record
formats).

Sorry for the churn!

llvm-svn: 289982
2016-12-16 19:39:01 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 74a835cda0 [IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
    not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
    replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
    more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
    DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s).  We also moved away from attaching the
    DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 289920
2016-12-16 04:25:54 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 03c6d31a3b Revert "[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable."
This reverts commit 289902 while investigating bot berakage.

llvm-svn: 289906
2016-12-16 01:00:30 +00:00
Adrian Prantl ce13935776 [IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
    not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
    replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
    more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
    DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s).  We also moved away from attaching the
    DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 289902
2016-12-16 00:36:43 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 9335c020c6 Fix MSVC bool to uint64_t promotion warning
llvm-svn: 288796
2016-12-06 11:12:53 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 941fa7588b [DIExpression] Introduce a dedicated DW_OP_LLVM_fragment operation
so we can stop using DW_OP_bit_piece with the wrong semantics.

The entire back story can be found here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20161114/405934.html

The gist is that in LLVM we've been misinterpreting DW_OP_bit_piece's
offset field to mean the offset into the source variable rather than
the offset into the location at the top the DWARF expression stack. In
order to be able to fix this in a subsequent patch, this patch
introduces a dedicated DW_OP_LLVM_fragment operation with the
semantics that we used to apply to DW_OP_bit_piece, which is what we
actually need while inside of LLVM. This patch is complete with a
bitcode upgrade for expressions using the old format. It does not yet
fix the DWARF backend to use DW_OP_bit_piece correctly.

Implementation note: We discussed several options for implementing
this, including reserving a dedicated field in DIExpression for the
fragment size and offset, but using an custom operator at the end of
the expression works just fine and is more efficient because we then
only pay for it when we need it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27361
rdar://problem/29335809

llvm-svn: 288683
2016-12-05 18:04:47 +00:00