Remove the instr_iterator versions of the splice() functions. It doesn't
seem useful to be able to splice sequences of instructions that don't
consist of full bundles.
The normal splice functions that take MBB::iterator arguments are not
changed, and they can move whole bundles around without any problems.
llvm-svn: 170456
The normal insert() function takes an MBB::iterator position, and
inserts a stand-alone MachineInstr as before.
The insert() function that takes an MBB::instr_iterator position can
insert instructions inside a bundle, and will now update the bundle
flags correctly when that happens.
When the insert position is between two bundles, it is unclear whether
the instruction should be appended to the previous bundle, prepended to
the next bundle, or stand on its own. The MBB::insert() function doesn't
bundle the instruction in that case, use the MIBundleBuilder class for
that.
llvm-svn: 170437
Most code is oblivious to bundles and uses the MBB::iterator which only
visits whole bundles. MBB::erase() operates on whole bundles at a time
as before.
MBB::remove() now refuses to remove bundled instructions. It is not safe
to remove all instructions in a bundle without deleting them since there
is no way of returning pointers to all the removed instructions.
MBB::remove_instr() and MBB::erase_instr() will now update bundle flags
correctly, lifting individual instructions out of bundles while leaving
the remaining bundle intact.
The MachineInstr convenience functions are updated so
eraseFromParent() erases a whole bundle as before
eraseFromBundle() erases a single instruction, leaving the rest of its bundle.
removeFromParent() refuses to operate on bundled instructions, and
removeFromBundle() lifts a single instruction out of its bundle.
These functions will no longer accidentally split or coalesce bundles -
bundle flags are updated to preserve the existing bundling, and explicit
bundleWith* / unbundleFrom* functions should be used to change the
instruction bundling.
This API update is still a work in progress. I am going to update APIs
first so they maintain bundle flags automatically when possible. Then
I'll add stricter verification of the bundle flags.
llvm-svn: 170384
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
The search for liveness is clipped to a specific number of instructions around the target MachineInstr, in order to avoid degenerating into an O(N^2) algorithm. It tries to use various clues about how instructions around (both before and after) a given MachineInstr use that register, to determine its state at the MachineInstr.
llvm-svn: 163695
The getSumForBlock function was quadratic in the number of successors
because getSuccWeight would perform a linear search for an already known
iterator.
This patch was originally committed as r161460, but reverted again
because of assertion failures. Now that duplicate Machine CFG edges have
been eliminated, this works properly.
llvm-svn: 162233
When replacing Old with New, it can happen that New is already a
successor. Add the old and new edge weights instead of creating a
duplicate edge.
llvm-svn: 161653
Register MachineOperands are kept in linked lists accessible via MRI's
reg_iterator interfaces. The linked list management was handled partly
by MachineOperand methods, partly by MRI methods.
Move all of the list management into MRI, delete
MO::AddRegOperandToRegInfo() and MO::RemoveRegOperandFromRegInfo().
Be more explicit about handling the cases where an MRI pointer isn't
available.
llvm-svn: 161632
The getSumForBlock function was quadratic in the number of successors
because getSuccWeight would perform a linear search for an already known
iterator.
llvm-svn: 161460
A->isPredecessor(B) is the same as B->isSuccessor(A), but it can
tolerate a B that is null or dangling. This shouldn't happen normally,
but it it useful for verification code.
llvm-svn: 160968
both fallthrough and a conditional branch target the same successor.
Gracefully delete the conditional branch and introduce any unconditional
branch needed to reach the actual successor. This fixes memory
corruption in 2009-06-15-RegScavengerAssert.ll and possibly other tests.
Also, while I'm here fix a latent bug I spotted by inspection. I never
applied the same fundamental fix to this fallthrough successor finding
logic that I did to the logic used when there are no conditional
branches. As a consequence it would have selected landing pads had they
be aligned in just the right way here. I don't have a test case as
I spotted this by inspection, and the previous time I found this
required have of TableGen's source code to produce it. =/ I hate backend
bugs. ;]
Thanks to Jim Grosbach for helping me reason through this and reviewing
the fix.
llvm-svn: 154867