Summary:
We can always build debugserver, but we can't always sign it to be useable for testing. `LLDB_USE_SYSTEM_DEBUGSERVER` should only tell whether or not the system debugserver should be used for testing.
The old behavior complicated the logic around debugserver a lot. The new logic sorts out most of it.
Please note that this patch is in early stage and needs some more testing. It should not affect platfroms other than Darwin. It builds on Davide's approach to validate the code-signing identity at configuration time.
What do you think?
Reviewers: xiaobai, JDevlieghere, davide, compnerd, friss, labath, mgorny, jasonmolenda
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64806
llvm-svn: 366433
Summary:
There's a number of requirements for installing LLDB on macOS that are untypical for LLVM projects: use special install-prefix for LLDB.framework, ship headers and tools as framework resources, patch RPATHs, externalize debug-info to dSYM's and strip binaries with `-ST`. For some of it we could use `llvm_externalize_debuginfo()` in the past and just add special cases. However, this complicates the code for all projects and comes with the major drawback, that it adds all these actions at build-time, i.e. dSYM creation and stripping take a lot of time and don't make sense at build-time.
LLVM's distribution mechanism (https://llvm.org/docs/BuildingADistribution.html) appears to be the natural candidate to install LLDB. Based on D64399 (enable in standalone builds), this patch integrates framework installation with the distribution mechanism and adds custom stripping flags and dSYM creation at install-time. Unlike the abandoned D61952, it leaves build-tree binaries untouched, so there's no side-effects on testing. Potential install-order issues must be handled externally.
Please let me know what you think, while I run a few more tests and add remarks+documentation.
Reviewers: xiaobai, compnerd, JDevlieghere, davide, labath, mgorny
Reviewed By: xiaobai, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64408
llvm-svn: 365617
Summary:
Modify the way LLDB.framework tools are collected. This allows for better fine-tuning of the install behavior downstream. Each target calls `lldb_add_to_framework()` individually. When entering the function, the target exists and we can tweak its very own post-build and install steps. This was not possible with the old `LLDB_FRAMEWORK_TOOLS` approach.
No function change otherwise.
This is a reduced follow-up from the proposal in D61952.
Reviewers: xiaobai, compnerd, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: clayborg, friss, ki.stfu, mgorny, lldb-commits, labath, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62472
llvm-svn: 361946
In an effort to help new LLDB developers, we added checks and messaging around
the selection of your codesigning identity on macOS. While helpful, it is not
actually correct. It's perfectly valid to codesign with an identity that is
not named lldb_codesign. Currently this fails the build.
This patch keeps a warning that informs developers how to setup lldb_codesign
and how to pass it to cmake, but it allows the build to proceed with a
different identity.
llvm-svn: 358525
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
Summary:
In 2010 (r118866), filtering code was added to debugserver to avoid reporting threads
that were "not ready to be displayed to the user". This code inspects the thread's
state and discards threads marked 'uninterruptible'. Turns out, this state is pretty
common and not only a characterisitic of 'user-readiness'. This filtering was tracked
down as the source of the flakiness of TestQueues and TestConcurrent* with the symptom
of missing threads.
We discussed with the kernel team and there should be no need for us to filter the
restult of task_threads(). Everything that is returned from there can be examined.
So I went on and tried to remove the filtering completely. This produces other test
failures, where we were reporting more theads than expected. Always threads that had
been terminated, but weren't removed from the task bookkeeping structures yet. Those
threads always had a PC of 0.
This patch changes the heuristic to make the filtering a little less strict and only
rejects threads that are 'uninteruptible' *and* have a PC of 0. This has proven to be
solid in my testing.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58912
llvm-svn: 355555
unused IsSBProcess method, and have IsFBSProcess
return false if we don't have API that we can use to
make that determination, so we'll try other API
if we can.
llvm-svn: 354289
Stefan Granitz
Jonas Devlieghere
Davide Italiano
J. Ryan Stinnett
Fangrui Song
Frederic Riss
Jason Molenda
Adrian Prantl