Summary: Since D65109 removed the manually maintained Xcode project, there's a few things we don't need anymore. Anything here we should keep or anything more to remove?
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, clayborg, jingham, lanza, teemperor
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65155
llvm-svn: 366879
Finally, after a lot of hard work from a bunch of people, we're in a
state where we can unify LLDB's build system.
This patch removes the hand-maintained Xcode project in favor of using
CMake in combination with the Xcode generator. Going forward, we want to
focus our efforts on improving the generated Xcode project.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65109
llvm-svn: 366739
r366471 added "-features autodoc" without a trailing comment, leading to `Unrecognized option -features autodoc-threads` due to implicit string concatenation. Add a comma to fix that.
Also separate into "-features" and "autodoc", otherwise it gets parsed as a single "-features autodoc" flag which is also not recognized (it must be two separate CLI args).
llvm-svn: 366478
The last swig 1.x release dates from 2009, now 10 years ago. Recently, I
fixed an issue that prevented us from using swig 4 (r364974), which
turned out to be not backward compatible with swig 1.x (r365718).
This patch deprecates this (really old) version of swig and makes swig 2
the minimum supported version in LLDB . This should be fine for the
build bots, which are all running swig 3 or later.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64782
llvm-svn: 366213
Apparently, when using swig 1.3.40, properties to set values do not work
without the `__swig_setmethods__` workaround. I conditionally added this
back for SBTypeCategory, as it's causing a test failure on GreenDragon,
while I investigate this further.
llvm-svn: 365718
There are pre-made utilities doing this. If somebody finds an
use for it and wants to resurrect, I would recommend to revise
the error messages.
llvm-svn: 365677
As of SWIG 4.0, __swig_getmethods__ and __swig_setmethods__ are no
longer defined. It appears that there's no need to mess with these
internals, we can simplify define the corresponding properties inline.
Originally I wanted to use the swig extension %attribute and
%attributeref to define properties. However, I couldn't find a way to
add documentation to these attributes. Since we already had the
properties defined inline, we might as well keep them.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63530
llvm-svn: 364974
As of SWIG 4.0, __swig_getmethods__ and __swig_setmethods__ are no
longer defined. The solution is to stop using these internal swig
dictionaries and use %attribute and %attributeref instead. I plan on
doing this incrementally, with this differential serving as an example.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63530
llvm-svn: 364946
Summary:
After the last round of cleanups, this script was almost a no-op. The
only piece of functionality that remained was the one which tried to
make the swig-generated function signatures more pythonic.
The "tried" part is important here, as it wasn't doing a really good job
and the end result was not valid python nor c (e.g.,
SetExecutable(SBAttachInfo self, str const * path)).
Doing these transformations another way is not possible, as these
signatures are generated by swig, and not present in source. However,
given that this is the only reason why we need a swig post-process step,
and that the current implementation is pretty sub-optimal, this patch
simply abandons the signature fixup idea, and chooses to simplify our
build process instead.
Reviewers: amccarth, jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61000
llvm-svn: 359092
The strings have been already cleaned up in r358683, so this code is not
doing anything anymore.
While comparing the outputs before and after removing the formatting
code, I've found a couple of docstrings that managed to escape my perl
script in r358683, so I format them manually with this patch.
llvm-svn: 358846
Summary:
This patch removes the "//----" frames and "///" leading lines from
docstring comments. We already have code doing transformations like this in
modify-python-lldb.py, but that's a script I'd like to remove. Instead
of running these transformations everytime we run swig, we can just
perform equivalent on its input once.
This patch can be reproduced (e.g. for downstream merges) with the
following "sweet" perl command:
perl -i -p -e 'BEGIN{ $/ = undef;} s:(" *\n) *//-----*\n:\1:gs; s:^( *)/// ?:\1:gsm; s:^ *//------*\n( *\n)?( *"):\2:gsm; s: *$::gsm; s:\n *"\):"):gsm' scripts/interface/*.i
This command produces nearly equivalent python files to those produced
by the relevant code in modify-python-lldb.py. The only difference I
noticed is that here I am slightly more agressive in removing trailing
newlines from docstring comments (the python script seems to leave
newlines in class-level docstrings).
Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg, jingham, aprantl
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60498
llvm-svn: 358683
Summary:
Some of these were present in files which should never be read by swig
(and we also had one in the interface file, which is only read by swig).
They are probably leftovers from the time when we were running swig over
lldb headers directly.
While writing this patch, I noticed that some of the #ifdefs were
guarding public functions that were operating on lldb_private data
types. While it wasn't strictly necessary for this patch, I made these
private, as nobody should really be accessing them. This can potentially
break existing code if it happened to use these methods, though it will
only break at build time -- if someone builds against an old header, he
should still be able to link to a new lldb library, since the functions
are still there.
We could keep these public for backward compatbility, but I would argue
that if anyone was actually using these functions for anything, his code
is already broken.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60400
llvm-svn: 357984
There are no patterns like that in the generated swig files (there
probably were some back in the days when we were running swig over the
header files directly), so this is dead code and has no effect on the
generated file.
llvm-svn: 357890
This is the last functional change to the generated python module being
done by modify-python-lldb.py. The remaining code just deals with
reformatting of comments.
llvm-svn: 357755
Summary:
This patch moves the modify-python-lldb code for adding new functions to
the SBModule class into the SBModule interface file. As this is the last
class using this functionality, I also remove all support for this kind
of modifications from modify-python-lldb.py.
Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: zturner, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60195
llvm-svn: 357680
Summary:
Instead of modifying the swig-generated code, just add the appropriate
methods to the interface files in order to get the swig to do the
generation for us.
This is a straight-forward move from the python script to the interface
files. The single class which has nontrivial handling in the script
(SBModule) has been left for a separate patch.
For the cases where I did not find any tests exercising the
iteration/length methods (i.e., no tests failed after I stopped emitting
them), I tried to add basic tests for that functionality.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, amccarth
Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60119
llvm-svn: 357572
Summary:
modify-python-lldb.py had code to insert python equality operators to
some classes. Some of those classes already had c++ equality operators,
and some didn't.
This makes the situation more consistent, by removing all equality
handilng from modify-python-lldb. Instead, I add c++ operators to
classes where they were missing, and expose them in the swig interface
files so that they are available to python too.
The only tricky case was the SBAddress class, which had an operator==
defined as a free function, which is not handled by swig. This function
cannot be removed without breaking ABI, and we cannot add an extra
operator== member, as that would make equality comparisons ambiguous.
For this class, I define a python __eq__ function by hand and have it
delegate to the operator!=, which I have defined as a member function.
This isn't fully NFC, as the semantics of some equality functions in
python changes slightly, but I believe it changes for the better (e.g.,
previously SBBreakpoint.__eq__ would consider two breakpoints with the
same ID as equal, even if they belonged to different targets; now they
are only equal if they belong to the same target).
Reviewers: jingham, clayborg, zturner
Subscribers: jdoerfert, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59819
llvm-svn: 357463
Stefan Granitz
Jonas Devlieghere
Jordan Rupprecht
Davide Italiano
Jim Ingham
Pavel Labath