As passed in the Cologne meeting and treated by Core as a DR,
[[nodiscard]] was applied to constructors so that they can be diagnosed
in cases where the user forgets a variable name for a type.
The intent is to enable the library to start using this on the
constructors of scope_guard/lock_guard.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64914
llvm-svn: 367027
Rename lang mode flag to -cl-std=clc++/-cl-std=CLC++
or -std=clc++/-std=CLC++.
This aligns with OpenCL C conversion and removes ambiguity
with OpenCL C++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65102
llvm-svn: 367008
Clang :: Headers/max_align.c currently FAILs on 64-bit SPARC:
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/dist/test/Headers/max_align.c Line 12: static_assert failed due to requirement '8 == _Alignof(max_align_t)' ""
1 error generated.
This happens because SuitableAlign isn't defined for SPARCv9 unlike SPARCv8
(which uses the default of 64 bits). gcc's sparc/sparc.h has
#define BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT (TARGET_ARCH64 ? 128 : 64)
This patch sets SuitableAlign to match and updates the corresponding testcase.
Tested on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64487
llvm-svn: 366820
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:
* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s)
* Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars
This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.
Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.
Re-landed after backing out 366450 due to missed hunks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456
llvm-svn: 366480
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:
* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s) * Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the
above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars
This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.
Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456
llvm-svn: 366450
Summary:
Preprocessor/init.c contains a line that explicitly checks for the
string
__VERSION__ "Clang{{.*}}
It's valid to have a toolchain configured to emit a vendor prefix
before the word Clang. e.g.
__VERSION__ "Vendor Clang{{.*}}
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64772
llvm-svn: 366159
Teaches ARM::appendArchExtFeatures to account dependencies when processing
target features: i.e. when you say -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve.fp+nofp it
means mve.fp should get discarded too. (Split from D63936)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64048
llvm-svn: 366031
Some targets such as Python 2.7.16 still use VERSION in
their builds. Without VERSION defined, the source code
has syntax errors.
Reverting as it will probably break many other things.
Noticed by Sterling Augustine
llvm-svn: 365992
This patch series adds support for the next-generation arch13
CPU architecture to the SystemZ backend.
This includes:
- Basic support for the new processor and its features.
- Support for low-level builtins mapped to new LLVM intrinsics.
- New high-level intrinsics in vecintrin.h.
- Indicate support by defining __VEC__ == 10303.
Note: No currently available Z system supports the arch13
architecture. Once new systems become available, the
official system name will be added as supported -march name.
llvm-svn: 365933
error: 'error' diagnostics expected but not seen:
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/local/test/Sema/wchar.c Line 22: initializing wide char array with non-wide string literal
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/local/test/Sema/wchar.c Line 20: array initializer must be an initializer list
File /vol/llvm/src/clang/local/test/Sema/wchar.c Line 22: array initializer must be an initializer list
It turns out the definition is wrong, as can be seen in GCC's gcc/config/sol2.h:
/* wchar_t is called differently in <wchar.h> for 32 and 64-bit
compilations. This is called for by SCD 2.4.1, p. 6-83, Figure 6-65
(32-bit) and p. 6P-10, Figure 6.38 (64-bit). */
#undef WCHAR_TYPE
#define WCHAR_TYPE (TARGET_64BIT ? "int" : "long int")
The following patch implements this, and at the same time corrects the wint_t
definition which is the same:
/* Same for wint_t. See SCD 2.4.1, p. 6-83, Figure 6-66 (32-bit). There's
no corresponding 64-bit definition, but this is what Solaris 8
<iso/wchar_iso.h> uses. */
#undef WINT_TYPE
#define WINT_TYPE (TARGET_64BIT ? "int" : "long int")
Clang :: Preprocessor/wchar_t.c and Clang :: Sema/format-strings.c need to
be adjusted to account for that.
Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11, x86_64-pc-solaris2.11, and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62944
llvm-svn: 363612
Summary:
vertical-line is not a BRE special character.
POSIX.1-2017 XBD Section 9.3.2 indicates that the interpretation of `\|`
is undefined. This patch uses EREs instead.
Additionally, the pattern is further fixed so that `SIZEOF` and `WIDTH`
macros are checked.
Reviewers: jlebar, daltenty, xingxue, jasonliu, tra
Reviewed By: tra
Subscribers: jfb, jsji, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63029
llvm-svn: 362991
If MVE is present at all, then the macro __ARM_FEATURE_MVE is defined
to a value which has bit 0 set for integer MVE, and bit 1 set for
floating-point MVE.
(Floating-point MVE implies integer MVE, so if this macro is defined
at all then it will be set to 1 or 3, never 2.)
Patch mostly by Simon Tatham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60710
llvm-svn: 362806
Change D60691 caused some knock-on failures that weren't caught by the
existing tests. Firstly, selecting a CPU that should have had a
restricted FPU (e.g. `-mcpu=cortex-m4`, which should have 16 d-regs
and no double precision) could give the unrestricted version, because
`ARM::getFPUFeatures` returned a list of features including subtracted
ones (here `-fp64`,`-d32`), but `ARMTargetInfo::initFeatureMap` threw
away all the ones that didn't start with `+`. Secondly, the
preprocessor macros didn't reliably match the actual compilation
settings: for example, `-mfpu=softvfp` could still set `__ARM_FP` as
if hardware FP was available, because the list of features on the cc1
command line would include things like `+vfp4`,`-vfp4d16` and clang
didn't realise that one of those cancelled out the other.
I've fixed both of these issues by rewriting `ARM::getFPUFeatures` so
that it returns a list that enables every FP-related feature
compatible with the selected FPU and disables every feature not
compatible, which is more verbose but means clang doesn't have to
understand the dependency relationships between the backend features.
Meanwhile, `ARMTargetInfo::handleTargetFeatures` is testing for all
the various forms of the FP feature names, so that it won't miss cases
where it should have set `HW_FP` to feed into feature test macros.
That in turn caused an ordering problem when handling `-mcpu=foo+bar`
together with `-mfpu=something_that_turns_off_bar`. To fix that, I've
arranged that the `+bar` suffixes on the end of `-mcpu` and `-march`
cause feature names to be put into a separate vector which is
concatenated after the output of `getFPUFeatures`.
Another side effect of all this is to fix a bug where `clang -target
armv8-eabi` by itself would fail to set `__ARM_FEATURE_FMA`, even
though `armv8` (aka Arm v8-A) implies FP-Armv8 which has FMA. That was
because `HW_FP` was being set to a value including only the `FPARMV8`
bit, but that feature test macro was testing only the `VFP4FPU` bit.
Now `HW_FP` ends up with all the bits set, so it gives the right
answer.
Changes to tests included in this patch:
* `arm-target-features.c`: I had to change basically all the expected
results. (The Cortex-M4 test in there should function as a
regression test for the accidental double-precision bug.)
* `arm-mfpu.c`, `armv8.1m.main.c`: switched to using `CHECK-DAG`
everywhere so that those tests are no longer sensitive to the order
of cc1 feature options on the command line.
* `arm-acle-6.5.c`: been updated to expect the right answer to that
FMA test.
* `Preprocessor/arm-target-features.c`: added a regression test for
the `mfpu=softvfp` issue.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, dmgreen, ostannard, samparker, JamesNagurne
Reviewed By: ostannard
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62998
llvm-svn: 362791
Erich Keane
Anastasia Stulova
Rainer Orth
Aaron Ballman
Alex Bradbury
Nathan Lanza
Sylvestre Ledru
Alexandros Lamprineas
JF Bastien
Ulrich Weigand
Reid Kleckner
Richard Smith
Aaron Puchert
Hubert Tong
Sjoerd Meijer
Simon Tatham
Pengfei Wang