Summary: Usually, SIGINT and SIGSTOP don't imply a crash, e.g. SIGSTOP is sent on process launch and attach on some platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67776
llvm-svn: 372961
The StringRef should always be identical to the C string, so we
might as well just create the StringRef from the C-string. This
might be slightly slower until we implement the storage of ArgEntry
with a string instead of a std::unique_ptr<char[]>. Until then we
have to do the additional strlen on the C string to construct the
StringRef.
llvm-svn: 371842
Summary:
We currently have several CommandObjects that manually reimplement the checking for a selected target
or a target in the execution context (which is the selected target when they are invoked). This patch removes
all these checks and replaces them by setting the eCommandRequiresTarget flag that Pavel suggested. With
this flag we are doing the same check but without having to duplicate this code in all these CommandObjects.
I also added a `GetSelectedTarget()` variant of the `GetSelectedOrDummyTarget()` function to the
CommandObject that checks that the flag is set and then returns a reference to the target. I didn't rewrite
all the `target` variables from `Target *` to `Target &` in this patch as last time this change caused a lot of merge
conflicts in Swift and I would prefer having that in a separate NFC commit.
Reviewers: labath, clayborg
Reviewed By: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: clayborg, JDevlieghere, jingham, amccarth, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66863
llvm-svn: 370571
Summary:
We currently have a bunch of code that is supposed to handle invalid command options, but
all this code is unreachable because invalid options are already handled in `Options::Parse`.
The only way we can reach this code is when we declare but then not implement an option
(which will be made impossible with D65386, which is also when we can completely remove
the `default` cases).
This patch replaces all this code with `llvm_unreachable` to make clear this is dead code
that can't be reached.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66522
llvm-svn: 369625
Summary:
We still have some leftovers of the old completion API in the internals of
LLDB that haven't been replaced by the new CompletionRequest. These leftovers
are:
* The return values (int/size_t) in all completion functions.
* Our result array that starts indexing at 1.
* `WordComplete` mode.
I didn't replace them back then because it's tricky to figure out what exactly they
are used for and the completion code is relatively untested. I finally got around
to writing more tests for the API and understanding the semantics, so I think it's
a good time to get rid of them.
A few words why those things should be removed/replaced:
* The return values are really cryptic, partly redundant and rarely documented.
They are also completely ignored by Xcode, so whatever information they contain will end up
breaking Xcode's completion mechanism. They are also partly impossible to even implement
as we assign negative values special meaning and our completion API sometimes returns size_t.
Completion functions are supposed to return -2 to rewrite the current line. We seem to use this
in some untested code path to expand the history repeat character to the full command, but
I haven't figured out why that doesn't work at the moment.
Completion functions return -1 to 'insert the completion character', but that isn't implemented
(even though we seem to activate this feature in LLDB sometimes).
All positive values have to match the number of results. This is obviously just redundant information
as the user can just look at the result list to get that information (which is what Xcode does).
* The result array that starts indexing at 1 is obviously unexpected. The first element of the array is
reserved for the common prefix of all completions (e.g. "foobar" and "footar" -> "foo"). The idea is
that we calculate this to make the life of the API caller easier, but obviously forcing people to have
1-based indices is not helpful (or even worse, forces them to manually copy the results to make it
0-based like Xcode has to do).
* The `WordComplete` mode indicates that LLDB should enter a space behind the completion. The
idea is that we let the top-level API know that we just provided a full completion. Interestingly we
`WordComplete` is just a single bool that somehow represents all N completions. And we always
provide full completions in LLDB, so in theory it should always be true.
The only use it currently serves is providing redundant information about whether we have a single
definitive completion or not (which we already know from the number of results we get).
This patch essentially removes `WordComplete` mode and makes the result array indexed from 0.
It also removes all return values from all internal completion functions. The only non-redundant information
they contain is about rewriting the current line (which is broken), so that functionality was moved
to the CompletionRequest API. So you can now do `addCompletion("blub", "description", CompletionMode::RewriteLine)`
to do the same.
For the SB API we emulate the old behaviour by making the array indexed from 1 again with the common
prefix at index 0. I didn't keep the special negative return codes as we either never sent them before (e.g. -2) or we
didn't even implement them in the Editline handler (e.g. -1).
I tried to keep this patch minimal and I'm aware we can probably now even further simplify a bunch of related code,
but I would prefer doing this in follow-up NFC commits
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66536
llvm-svn: 369624
Summary:
Right now our CommandOptions.inc only generates the initializer for the options list but
not the array declaration boilerplate around it. As the array definition is identical for all arrays,
we might as well also let the CommandOptions.inc generate it alongside the initializers.
This patch will also allow us to generate additional declarations related to that option list in
the future (e.g. a enum class representing the specific options which would make our
handling code less prone).
This patch also fixes a few option tables that didn't follow our naming style.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65331
llvm-svn: 367186
Before this change we were overriding the launch info environment with
the target environment. This meant that the environment variables passed
to `process launch --environment <>` were lost. Instead of replacing the
environment, we should merge them.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61864
llvm-svn: 360612
In r359354 a GetDebugger() method was added to the CommandObject class,
so that we didn't have to go through the command interpreter to obtain
the script interpreter. This patch simplifies other call sites where
m_interpreter.GetDebugger() was used, and replaces them with a shorter
call to the new method.
llvm-svn: 359373
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
This patch removes the logic for resolving paths out of FileSpec and
updates call sites to rely on the FileSystem class instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53915
llvm-svn: 345890
This is an NFC commit to refactor the "load dependent files" parameter
from a boolean to an enum value. We want to be able to specify a
default, in which case we decide whether or not to load the dependent
files based on whether the target is an executable or not (i.e. a
dylib).
This is a dependency for D51934.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51859
llvm-svn: 342633
These three classes have no external dependencies, but they are used
from various low-level APIs. Moving them down to Utility improves
overall code layering (although it still does not break any particular
dependency completely).
The XCode project will need to be updated after this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49740
llvm-svn: 339127
Summary:
We currently allow any completion handler to read and manipulate the list of matches we
calculated so far. This leads to a few problems:
Firstly, a completion handler's logic can now depend on previously calculated results
by another handlers. No completion handler should have such an implicit dependency,
but the current API makes it likely that this could happen (or already happens). Especially
the fact that some completion handler deleted all previously calculated results can mess
things up right now.
Secondly, all completion handlers have knowledge about our internal data structures with
this API. This makes refactoring this internal data structure much harder than it should be.
Especially planned changes like the support of descriptions for completions are currently
giant patches because we have to refactor every single completion handler.
This patch narrows the contract the CompletionRequest has with the different handlers to:
1. A handler can suggest a completion.
2. A handler can ask how many suggestions we already have.
Point 2 obviously means we still have a dependency left between the different handlers, but
getting rid of this is too large to just append it to this patch.
Otherwise this patch just completely hides the internal StringList to the different handlers.
The CompletionRequest API now also ensures that the list of completions is unique and we
don't suggest the same value multiple times to the user. This property has been so far only
been ensured by the `Option` handler, but is now applied globally. This is part of this patch
as the OptionHandler is no longer able to implement this functionality itself.
Reviewers: jingham, davide, labath
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49322
llvm-svn: 338151
Summary:
As suggested in D48796, this patch replaces even more internal calls that were using the old
completion API style with a single CompletionRequest. In some cases we also pass an option
vector/index, but as we don't always have this information, it currently is not part of the
CompletionRequest class.
The constructor of the CompletionRequest is now also more sensible. You only pass the
user input, cursor position and your list of matches to the request and the rest will be
inferred (using the same code we used before to calculate this). You also have to pass these
match window parameters to it, even though they are unused right now.
The patch shouldn't change any behavior.
Reviewers: jingham
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48976
llvm-svn: 337031
Adrian Prantl
Tatyana Krasnukha
Raphael Isemann
Jonas Devlieghere
Chandler Carruth
Pavel Labath