Commit Graph

162 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nicola Zaghen d34e60ca85 Rename DEBUG macro to LLVM_DEBUG.
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.

In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624

llvm-svn: 332240
2018-05-14 12:53:11 +00:00
Max Kazantsev 30dee7874d [NFC] Use forgetTopmostLoop instead of logic duplication
llvm-svn: 330683
2018-04-24 04:33:04 +00:00
Max Kazantsev a55749312b [LoopUnroll] Fix dangling pointers in SCEV
Current logic of loop SCEV invalidation in Loop Unroller implicitly relies on
fact that exit count of outer loops cannot rely on exiting blocks of
inner loops, which is true in current implementation of backedge taken count
calculation but is wrong in general. As result, when we only forget the loop that
we have just unrolled, we may still have cached data for its outer loops (in particular,
exit counts) which keeps references on blocks of inner loop that could have been
changed or even deleted.

The attached test demonstrates a situaton when after unrolling of innermost loop
the outermost loop contains a dangling pointer on non-existant block. The problem
shows up when we apply patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D44677 that makes SCEV
smarter about exit count calculation. I am not sure if the bug exists without this patch,
it appears that now it is accidentally correct just because in practice exact backedge
taken count for outer loops with complex control flow inside is never calculated.
But when SCEV learns to do so, this problem shows up.

This patch replaces existing logic of SCEV loop invalidation with a correct one, which
happens to be invalidation of outermost loop (which also leads to invalidation of all
loops inside of it). It is the only way to ensure that no outer loop keeps dangling pointers
on removed blocks, or just outdated information that has changed after unrolling.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44818
Reviewed By: samparker

llvm-svn: 328483
2018-03-26 11:31:46 +00:00
Florian Hahn 52436a587e [LoopUnroll] Simplify induction variables after peeling too.
Loop peeling also has an impact on the induction variables, so we should
benefit from induction variable simplification after peeling too.

Reviewers: sanjoy, bogner, mzolotukhin, efriedma

Reviewed By: efriedma

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43878

llvm-svn: 328301
2018-03-23 10:38:12 +00:00
David Blaikie 2be3922807 Fix a couple of layering violations in Transforms
Remove #include of Transforms/Scalar.h from Transform/Utils to fix layering.

Transforms depends on Transforms/Utils, not the other way around. So
remove the header and the "createStripGCRelocatesPass" function
declaration (& definition) that is unused and motivated this dependency.

Move Transforms/Utils/Local.h into Analysis because it's used by
Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.cpp.

llvm-svn: 328165
2018-03-21 22:34:23 +00:00
David Green 7c35de124a [Dominators] Remove verifyDomTree and add some verifying for Post Dom Trees
Removes verifyDomTree, using assert(verify()) everywhere instead, and
changes verify a little to always run IsSameAsFreshTree first in order
to print good output when we find errors. Also adds verifyAnalysis for
PostDomTrees, which will allow checking of PostDomTrees it the same way
we check DomTrees and MachineDomTrees.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41298

llvm-svn: 326315
2018-02-28 11:00:08 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer c7fc81e659 Use phi ranges to simplify code. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 321585
2017-12-30 15:27:33 +00:00
Michael Zolotukhin 6af4f232b5 Remove redundant includes from lib/Transforms.
llvm-svn: 320628
2017-12-13 21:31:01 +00:00
Adrian Prantl bfa77c4c85 loop-unroll: teach remapInstruction to update dbg.value intrinsics.
Fixes PR35112.

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35112

llvm-svn: 317138
2017-11-01 23:12:35 +00:00
David Green 64f53b4214 [LoopUnroll] Clean up remarks for unroll remainder
The optimisation remarks for loop unrolling with an unrolled remainder looks something like:

test.c:7:18: remark: completely unrolled loop with 3 iterations [-Rpass=loop-unroll]
            C[i] += A[i*N+j];
                 ^
test.c:6:9: remark: unrolled loop by a factor of 4 with run-time trip count [-Rpass=loop-unroll]
        for(int j = 0; j < N; j++)
        ^
This removes the first of the two messages.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38725

llvm-svn: 316986
2017-10-31 10:47:46 +00:00
Dehao Chen ed2d5402cb Do not add discriminator encoding for debug intrinsics.
Summary: There are certain requirements for debug location of debug intrinsics, e.g. the scope of the DILocalVariable should be the same as the scope of its debug location. As a result, we should not add discriminator encoding for debug intrinsics.

Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl

Reviewed By: aprantl

Subscribers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, bjope, sanjoy, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39343

llvm-svn: 316703
2017-10-26 21:20:52 +00:00
Vivek Pandya 9590658fb8 [NFC] Convert OptimizationRemarkEmitter old emit() calls to new closure
parameterized emit() calls

Summary: This is not functional change to adopt new emit() API added in r313691.

Reviewed By: anemet

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38285

llvm-svn: 315476
2017-10-11 17:12:59 +00:00
Adam Nemet 0965da2055 Rename OptimizationDiagnosticInfo.* to OptimizationRemarkEmitter.*
Sync it up with the name of the class actually defined here.  This has been
bothering me for a while...

llvm-svn: 315249
2017-10-09 23:19:02 +00:00
Sanjoy Das def1729dc4 Use a BumpPtrAllocator for Loop objects
Summary:
And now that we no longer have to explicitly free() the Loop instances, we can
(with more ease) use the destructor of LoopBase to do what LoopBase::clear() was
doing.

Reviewers: chandlerc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mcrosier, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38201

llvm-svn: 314375
2017-09-28 02:45:42 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 3567d3d2ec Rename LoopUnrollStatus to LoopUnrollResult; NFC
A "Result" suffix is more appropriate here

llvm-svn: 314350
2017-09-27 21:45:19 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 388b012f4e Rename markAsErased to erase, as pointed out in a previous review; NFC
llvm-svn: 313951
2017-09-22 01:47:41 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 09613b122e Tighten the invariants around LoopBase::invalidate
Summary:
With this change:
 - Methods in LoopBase trip an assert if the receiver has been invalidated
 - LoopBase::clear frees up the memory held the LoopBase instance

This change also shuffles things around as necessary to work with this stricter invariant.

Reviewers: chandlerc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mcrosier, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38055

llvm-svn: 313708
2017-09-20 02:31:57 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 76ab23234c [LoopInfo] Make LoopBase and Loop destructors non-public
Summary:
See comment for why I think this is a good idea.

This change also:

 - Removes an SCEV test case.  The SCEV test was not testing anything useful (most of it was `#if 0` ed out) and it would need to be updated to deal with a private ~Loop::Loop.
 - Updates the loop pass manager test case to deal with a private ~Loop::Loop.
 - Renames markAsRemoved to markAsErased to contrast with removeLoop, via the usual remove vs. erase idiom we already have for instructions and basic blocks.

Reviewers: chandlerc

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mcrosier, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37996

llvm-svn: 313695
2017-09-19 23:19:00 +00:00
Adam Nemet 15fccf0009 Allow ORE.emit to take a closure to delay building the remark object
In the lambda we are now returning the remark by value so we need to preserve
its type in the insertion operator.  This requires making the insertion
operator generic.

I've also converted a few cases to use the new API.  It seems to work pretty
well.  See the LoopUnroller for a slightly more interesting case.

llvm-svn: 313691
2017-09-19 23:00:55 +00:00
Davide Italiano 20cb7e887f [LoopUnroll] Properly update loop structure in case of successful peeling.
When peeling kicks in, it updates the loop preheader.
Later, a successful full unroll of the loop needs to update a PHI
which i-th argument comes from the loop preheader, so it'd better look
at the correct block. Fixes PR33437.

Differential Revision:  https://reviews.llvm.org/D37153

llvm-svn: 311922
2017-08-28 20:29:33 +00:00
Sam Parker 718c8a6a2a [LoopUnroll] Enable option to peel remainder loop
On some targets, the penalty of executing runtime unrolling checks
and then not the unrolled loop can be significantly detrimental to
performance. This results in the need to be more conservative with
the unroll count, keeping a trip count of 2 reduces the overhead as
well as increasing the chance of the unrolled body being executed. But
being conservative leaves performance gains on the table.

This patch enables the unrolling of the remainder loop introduced by
runtime unrolling. This can help reduce the overhead of misunrolled
loops because the cost of non-taken branches is much less than the
cost of the backedge that would normally be executed in the remainder
loop. This allows larger unroll factors to be used without suffering
performance loses with smaller iteration counts.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36309

llvm-svn: 310824
2017-08-14 09:25:26 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 6bda14b313 Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.

I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.

This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.

Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).

llvm-svn: 304787
2017-06-06 11:49:48 +00:00
Sanjoy Das e6bca0eecb Rename WeakVH to WeakTrackingVH; NFC
This relands r301424.

llvm-svn: 301812
2017-05-01 17:07:49 +00:00
Daniel Berlin 4d0fe64ae3 Kill off the old SimplifyInstruction API by converting remaining users.
llvm-svn: 301673
2017-04-28 19:55:38 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 2cbeb00f38 Reverts commit r301424, r301425 and r301426
Commits were:

"Use WeakVH instead of WeakTrackingVH in AliasSetTracker's UnkownInsts"
"Add a new WeakVH value handle; NFC"
"Rename WeakVH to WeakTrackingVH; NFC"

The changes assumed pointers are 8 byte aligned on all architectures.

llvm-svn: 301429
2017-04-26 16:37:05 +00:00