The COFFSymbolRef::isFunctionDefinition() function tests for several conditions
that are not related to whether a symbol is a function, but rather whether
the symbol meets the requirements for a function definition auxiliary record,
which excludes certain symbols such as internal functions and undefined
references. The test we need to determine the symbol type is much simpler:
we only need to compare the complex type against IMAGE_SYM_DTYPE_FUNCTION.
llvm-svn: 244195
This makes llvm-nm consistent with binutils nm on executables and DLLs.
For a vanilla hello world executable, the address of main should include
the default image base of 0x400000.
llvm-svn: 243755
Object: add IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_ARM64
The official specifications state that the value of IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_ARM64
is 0xAA64 (as per the Microsoft Portable Executable and Common Object Format
Specification v8.3).
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits, compnerd, ruiu
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11511
llvm-svn: 243434
getSymbolValue now returns a value that in convenient for most callers:
* 0 for undefined
* symbol size for common symbols
* offset/address for symbols the rest
Code that needs something more specific can check getSymbolFlags.
llvm-svn: 241605
Originally added in r139314.
Back then it didn't actually get the address, it got whatever value the
relocation used: address or offset.
The values in different object formats are:
* MachO: Always an offset.
* COFF: Always an address, but when talking about the virtual address of
sections it says: "for simplicity, compilers should set this to zero".
* ELF: An offset for .o files and and address for .so files. In the case of the
.so, the relocation in not linked to any section (sh_info is 0). We can't
really compute an offset.
Some API mappings would be:
* Use getAddress for everything. It would be quite cumbersome. To compute the
address elf has to follow sh_info, which can be corrupted and therefore the
method has to return an ErrorOr. The address of the section is also the same
for every relocation in a section, so we shouldn't have to check the error
and fetch the value for every relocation.
* Use a getValue and make it up to the user to know what it is getting.
* Use a getOffset and:
* Assert for dynamic ELF objects. That is a very peculiar case and it is
probably fair to ask any tool that wants to support it to use ELF.h. The
only tool we have that reads those (llvm-readobj) already does that. The
only other use case I can think of is a dynamic linker.
* Check that COFF .obj files have sections with zero virtual address spaces. If
it turns out that some assembler/compiler produces these, we can change
COFFObjectFile::getRelocationOffset to subtract it. Given COFF format,
this can be done without the need for ErrorOr.
The getRelocationAddress method was never implemented for COFF. It also
had exactly one use in a very peculiar case: a shortcut for adding the
section value to a pcrel reloc on MachO.
Given that, I don't expect that there is any use out there of the C API. If
that is not the case, let me know and I will add it back with the implementation
inlined and do a proper deprecation.
llvm-svn: 241450
When talking about the virtual address of sections the coff spec says:
... for simplicity, compilers should set this to zero. Otherwise, it is an
arbitrary value that is subtracted from offsets during relocation.
We don't currently subtract it, so check that it is zero.
If some producer does create such files, we can change getRelocationOffset
instead.
llvm-svn: 241447
This function can really fail since the string table offset can be out of
bounds.
Using ErrorOr makes sure the error is checked.
Hopefully a lot of the boilerplate code in tools/* can go away once we have
a diagnostic manager in Object.
llvm-svn: 241297
If you only need Name and Value fields in the COFF symbol,
you don't need to distinguish 32 bit and 64 bit COFF symbols.
These fields start at the same offsets and have the same size.
This data strucutre is one pointer smaller than COFFSymbolRef
thus slightly efficient. I'll use this class in LLD as we create
millions of LLD symbol objects that currently contain COFFSymbolRef.
Shaving off 8 byte (or 4 byte on 32 bit) from that class actually
matters becasue of the number of objects we create in LLD.
llvm-svn: 241024
This is still a really odd function. Most calls are in object format specific
contexts and should probably be replaced with a more direct query, but at least
now this is not too obnoxious to use.
llvm-svn: 240777
On ELF that was already the case since getting the size of a symbol
never fails.
On MachO and COFF we could fail trying to get the section of a symbol. But
we don't really need the section, just the section number to know if two
symbols are in the same section or not.
llvm-svn: 240580
This returns either the symbol offset or address. Since it is not defined which
one, it never has to lookup the section and so never fails.
I will add users in the next commit.
llvm-svn: 240569
COFF and MachO only define symbol sizes for common symbols. Reflect that
in the class hierarchy by having a method for common symbols only in the base
and a general one in ELF.
This avoids the need of using a magic value for the size, which had a few
problems
* Most callers didn't check for it.
* The ones that did could not tell the magic value from a file actually having
that value.
llvm-svn: 240529
There are 3 types of relocations on MachO
* Scattered
* Section based
* Symbol based
On ELF and COFF relocations are symbol based.
We were in the strange situation that we abstracted over two of them. This makes
section based relocations MachO only.
llvm-svn: 240149
make_error_code(object_error) is slow because object::object_category()
uses a ManagedStatic variable. But the real problem is that the function is
called too frequently. This patch uses std::error_code() instead of
object_error::success. In most cases, we return "success", so this patch
reduces number of function calls to that function.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10333
llvm-svn: 239409