Commit Graph

129 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Greg Clayton 99558cc424 Final bit of type system cleanup that abstracts declaration contexts into lldb_private::CompilerDeclContext and renames ClangType to CompilerType in many accessors and functions.
Create a new "lldb_private::CompilerDeclContext" class that will replace all direct uses of "clang::DeclContext" when used in compiler agnostic code, yet still allow for conversion to clang::DeclContext subclasses by clang specific code. This completes the abstraction of type parsing by removing all "clang::" references from the SymbolFileDWARF. The new "lldb_private::CompilerDeclContext" class abstracts decl contexts found in compiler type systems so they can be used in internal API calls. The TypeSystem is required to support CompilerDeclContexts with new pure virtual functions that start with "DeclContext" in the member function names. Converted all code that used lldb_private::ClangNamespaceDecl over to use the new CompilerDeclContext class and removed the ClangNamespaceDecl.cpp and ClangNamespaceDecl.h files.

Removed direct use of clang APIs from SBType and now use the abstract type systems to correctly explore types.

Bulk renames for things that used to return a ClangASTType which is now CompilerType:

    "Type::GetClangFullType()" to "Type::GetFullCompilerType()"
    "Type::GetClangLayoutType()" to "Type::GetLayoutCompilerType()"
    "Type::GetClangForwardType()" to "Type::GetForwardCompilerType()"
    "Value::GetClangType()" to "Value::GetCompilerType()"
    "Value::SetClangType (const CompilerType &)" to "Value::SetCompilerType (const CompilerType &)"
    "ValueObject::GetClangType ()" to "ValueObject::GetCompilerType()"
    many more renames that are similar.

llvm-svn: 245905
2015-08-24 23:46:31 +00:00
Greg Clayton a1e5dc86a6 ClangASTType is now CompilerType.
This is more preparation for multiple different kinds of types from different compilers (clang, Pascal, Go, RenderScript, Swift, etc).

llvm-svn: 244689
2015-08-11 22:53:00 +00:00
Chaoren Lin 4630de80c5 Deprecate SBValue::TypeIsPointerType.
Reviewers: clayborg

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11540

llvm-svn: 243333
2015-07-27 21:51:56 +00:00
Enrico Granata 989e213c18 Fix an issue where an SBValue could end up capturing a synthetic value and would then be unable to return the non-synthetic version thereof
This patch makes the backing ValueImpl always store the root-most value no matter the "flavor" that is initially passed into it

llvm-svn: 240578
2015-06-24 19:53:22 +00:00
Greg Clayton 7d1483f51c Cleanup the code a bit to make it more readable.
Add some if/then to avoid calling a function to get dynamic/synthetic types if we know we aren't going to need to call it.

Avoid calling a function that returns a shared pointer twice: once for testing it and once for assigning it (even though that shared pointer is cached inside the value object), it just makes the code a bit clearer.

llvm-svn: 240299
2015-06-22 17:38:30 +00:00
Zachary Turner 1124045ac7 Don't #include "lldb-python.h" from anywhere.
Since interaction with the python interpreter is moving towards
being more isolated, we won't be able to include this header from
normal files anymore, all includes of it should be localized to
the python library which will live under source/bindings/API/Python
after a future patch.

None of the files that were including this header actually depended
on it anyway, so it was just a dead include in every single instance.

llvm-svn: 238581
2015-05-29 17:41:47 +00:00
Bruce Mitchener 11d86362ae Remove duplicated code for synthetic array members.
Summary:
The code for GetSyntheticArrayMemberFromPointer and
GetSyntheticArrayMemberFromArray was identical, so just collapse the
the methods into one.

Reviewers: granata.enrico, clayborg

Reviewed By: clayborg

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7911

llvm-svn: 230708
2015-02-26 23:55:39 +00:00
Enrico Granata 560558eb7c Introduce the notion of "runtime support values"
A runtime support value is a ValueObject whose only purpose is to support some language runtime's operation, but it does not directly provide any user-visible benefit
As such, unless the user is working on the runtime support, it is mostly safe for them not to see such a value when debugging

It is a language runtime's job to check whether a ValueObject is a support value, and that - in conjunction with a target setting - is used by frame variable and target variable
SBFrame::GetVariables gets a new overload with yet another flag to dictate whether to return those support values to the caller - that which defaults to the setting's value

rdar://problem/15539930

llvm-svn: 228791
2015-02-11 02:35:39 +00:00
Ilia K 761a7a4b67 Fix evaluation commands (MI)
Summary:
These changes include:
* Fix -var-create to be able use current frame '*' (MI)
* Fix print-values option in -var-update (MI)
* Fix 'variable doesn't exist' error in -var-show-attributes (MI)
* Mark print-values option as 'handled-by-cmd' in -var-update (MI)
* Fix SBValue::GetValueDidChange if value was changed
* Fix lldb-mi: -data-evaluate-expression shows undef vars. Before this fix -data-evaluate-expression perceives undefined variables as strings:
```
(gdb)
-data-evaluate-expression undef
^done,value="undef"
```
* Minor fix: -data-evaluate-expression uses IsUnknownValue()
* Enable MiEvaluateTestCase test

All test pass on OS X.

Reviewers: abidh, clayborg

Subscribers: lldb-commits, clayborg, abidh

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7463

llvm-svn: 228414
2015-02-06 18:10:30 +00:00
Enrico Granata 972be53f02 Provide CreateValueFromData,Expression at the SBTarget level as well as the SBValue level; and also make all the implenentations agree on using the matching ValueObject::Create instead of doing code copypastas
llvm-svn: 224460
2014-12-17 21:18:43 +00:00
Enrico Granata 0c10a85000 Add the ability for an SBValue to create a persisted version of itself.
Such a persisted version is equivalent to evaluating the value via the expression evaluator, and holding on to the $n result of the expression, except this API can be used on SBValues that do not obviously come from an expression (e.g. are the result of a memory lookup)

Expose this via SBValue::Persist() in our public API layer, and ValueObject::Persist() in the lldb_private layer

Includes testcase

Fixes rdar://19136664

llvm-svn: 223711
2014-12-08 23:13:56 +00:00
Enrico Granata 49bfafb510 Shuffle APIs around a little bit, so that if you pass custom summary options, we don't end up caching the summary hence obtained. You may want to obtain an uncapped summary, but this should not be reflected in the summary we cache. The drawback is that we don't cache as aggressively as we could, but at least you get to have different summaries with different options without having to reset formatters or the SBValue at each step
llvm-svn: 222280
2014-11-18 23:36:25 +00:00
Enrico Granata c1247f5596 Introduce the notion of "type summary options" as flags that can be passed down to individual summary formatters to alter their behavior in a formatter-dependent way
Two flags are introduced:
- preferred display language (as in, ObjC vs. C++)
- summary capping (as in, should a limit be put to the amount of data retrieved)

The meaning - if any - of these options is for individual formatters to establish
The topic of a subsequent commit will be to actually wire these through to individual data formatters

llvm-svn: 221482
2014-11-06 21:23:20 +00:00
Enrico Granata edc4414094 Expose the ability to retrieve the result of a type validator via the SB API. To keep it simple, do not expose the pair, but just return a NULL string for success, and a non-NULL string for error; If we were to decide to expose the pair, we would need an SBTypeValidatorResult, which is fine, but it should come as part of exposing type validators through the SB API rather than as a one-off thing. So, KISS for now
llvm-svn: 217299
2014-09-06 01:30:04 +00:00
Enrico Granata e8daa2f843 Introduce the concept of a "display name" for types
Rationale:
Pretty simply, the idea is that sometimes type names are way too long and contain way too many details for the average developer to care about. For instance, a plain ol' vector of int might be shown as
std::__1::vector<int, std::__1::allocator<....
rather than the much simpler std::vector<int> form, which is what most developers would actually type in their code

Proposed solution:
Introduce a notion of "display name" and a corresponding API GetDisplayTypeName() to return such a crafted for visual representation type name
Obviously, the display name and the fully qualified (or "true") name are not necessarily the same - that's the whole point
LLDB could choose to pick the "display name" as its one true notion of a type name, and if somebody really needs the fully qualified version of it, let them deal with the problem
Or, LLDB could rename what it currently calls the "type name" to be the "display name", and add new APIs for the fully qualified name, making the display name the default choice

The choice that I am making here is that the type name will keep meaning the same, and people who want a type name suited for display will explicitly ask for one
It is the less risky/disruptive choice - and it should eventually make it fairly obvious when someone is asking for the wrong type

Caveats:
- for now, GetDisplayTypeName() == GetTypeName(), there is no logic to produce customized display type names yet.
- while the fully-qualified type name is still the main key to the kingdom of data formatters, if we start showing custom names to people, those should match formatters

llvm-svn: 209072
2014-05-17 19:14:17 +00:00
Saleem Abdulrasool 324a103619 sweep up -Wformat warnings from gcc
This is a purely mechanical change explicitly casting any parameters for printf
style conversion.  This cleans up the warnings emitted by gcc 4.8 on Linux.

llvm-svn: 205607
2014-04-04 04:06:10 +00:00
Sean Callanan 866e91c9d4 Better error reporting when a variable can't be
read during materialization.  First of all, report
if we can't read the data for some reason.  Second,
consult the ValueObject's error and report that if
there's some problem.

<rdar://problem/16074201>

llvm-svn: 202552
2014-02-28 22:27:53 +00:00
Jim Ingham 793d8d9c00 Do a little more prevention against SBValues getting used after the world has been torn down around them.
llvm-svn: 196616
2013-12-06 22:21:04 +00:00
Jason Molenda b57e4a1bc6 Roll back the changes I made in r193907 which created a new Frame
pure virtual base class and made StackFrame a subclass of that.  As
I started to build on top of that arrangement today, I found that it
wasn't working out like I intended.  Instead I'll try sticking with
the single StackFrame class -- there's too much code duplication to
make a more complicated class hierarchy sensible I think.

llvm-svn: 193983
2013-11-04 09:33:30 +00:00
Jason Molenda f23bf7432c Add a new base class, Frame. It is a pure virtual function which
defines a protocol that all subclasses will implement.  StackFrame
is currently the only subclass and the methods that Frame vends are
nearly identical to StackFrame's old methods.

Update all callers to use Frame*/Frame& instead of pointers to
StackFrames.

This is almost entirely a mechanical change that touches a lot of
the code base so I'm committing it alone.  No new functionality is
added with this patch, no new subclasses of Frame exist yet.

I'll probably need to tweak some of the separation, possibly moving
some of StackFrame's methods up in to Frame, but this is a good
starting point.

<rdar://problem/15314068>

llvm-svn: 193907
2013-11-02 02:23:02 +00:00
Enrico Granata d7373f69cf SBValue::GetValueAsUnsigned()/GetValueAsSigned() should not replicate the Scalar manipulation logic found in ValueObject, but rather just call down to it
llvm-svn: 193786
2013-10-31 18:57:50 +00:00
Enrico Granata dc4db5a6eb <rdar://problem/15144376>
This commit reimplements the TypeImpl class (the class that backs SBType) in terms of a static,dynamic type pair

This is useful for those cases when the dynamic type of an ObjC variable can only be obtained in terms of an "hollow" type with no ivars
In that case, we could either go with the static type (+iVar information) or with the dynamic type (+inheritance chain)

With the new TypeImpl implementation, we try to combine these two sources of information in order to extract as much information as possible
This should improve the functionality of tools that are using the SBType API to do extensive dynamic type inspection

llvm-svn: 193564
2013-10-29 00:28:35 +00:00
Enrico Granata 347c2aa3e3 <rdar://problem/14028923>
Implement SBTarget::CreateValueFromAddress() with a behavior equivalent to SBValue::CreateValueFromAddress()
(but without the need to grab an SBValue first just as a starting point to make up another SBValue out of whole cloth)

llvm-svn: 192239
2013-10-08 21:49:02 +00:00
Enrico Granata 4d93b8cdf3 <rdar://problem/14393032>
DumpValueObject() 2.0

This checkin restores pre-Xcode5 functionality to the "po" (expr -O) command:
- expr now has a new --description-verbosity (-v) argument, which takes either compact or full as a value (-v is the same as -vfull)
 When the full mode is on, "po" will show the extended output with type name, persistent variable name and value, as in
(lldb) expr -O -v -- foo
(id) $0 = 0x000000010010baf0 {
    1 = 2;
    2 = 3;
}

 When -v is omitted, or -vcompact is passed, the Xcode5-style output will be shown, as in
(lldb) expr -O -- foo
{
    1 = 2;
    2 = 3;
}

- for a non-ObjectiveC object, LLDB will still try to retrieve a summary and/or value to display
(lldb) po 5
5
-v also works in this mode
(lldb) expr -O -vfull -- 5
(int) $4 = 5 

On top of that, this is a major refactoring of the ValueObject printing code. The functionality is now factored into a ValueObjectPrinter class for easier maintenance in the future
DumpValueObject() was turned into an instance method ValueObject::Dump() which simply calls through to the printer code, Dump_Impl has been removed

Test case to follow

llvm-svn: 191694
2013-09-30 19:11:51 +00:00
Daniel Malea e0f8f574c7 merge lldb-platform-work branch (and assorted fixes) into trunk
Summary:
    This merge brings in the improved 'platform' command that knows how to
    interface with remote machines; that is, query OS/kernel information, push
    and pull files, run shell commands, etc... and implementation for the new
    communication packets that back that interface, at least on Darwin based
    operating systems via the POSIXPlatform class. Linux support is coming soon.

    Verified the test suite runs cleanly on Linux (x86_64), build OK on Mac OS
    X Mountain Lion.

    Additional improvements (not in the source SVN branch 'lldb-platform-work'):
    - cmake build scripts for lldb-platform
    - cleanup test suite
    - documentation stub for qPlatform_RunCommand
    - use log class instead of printf() directly
    - reverted work-in-progress-looking changes from test/types/TestAbstract.py that work towards running the test suite remotely.
    - add new logging category 'platform'

    Reviewers: Matt Kopec, Greg Clayton

    Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1493

llvm-svn: 189295
2013-08-26 23:57:52 +00:00