This:
a) teaches PythonCallable to look inside a callable object
b) teaches PythonCallable to discover whether a callable method is bound
c) teaches lldb.command to dispatch to either the older 4 argument version or the newer 5 argument version
llvm-svn: 273640
This finishes the effort to port python-wrapper.swig code over to
using PythonDataObjects.
Also included in this patch is the removal of `PyCallable` from
`python-wrapper.swig`, as it is no longer used after having been
replaced by `PythonCallable` everywhere.
There might be additional cleanup as followup patches, but it should
be all fairly simple and minor.
llvm-svn: 252939
PyCallable is a class that exists solely within the swig wrapper
code. PythonCallable is a more generic implementation of the same
idea that can be used by any Python-related interop code, and lives
in PythonDataObjects.h
The CL is mostly mechanical, and it doesn't cover every possible
user of PyCallable, because I want to minimize the impact of this
change (as well as making it easier to figure out what went wrong
in case this causes a failure). I plan to finish up the rest of
the changes in a subsequent patch, culminating in the removal of
PyCallable entirely.
llvm-svn: 252906
This had been relegated to a simple forwarding function, so just
delete it in preparation of migrating all of these functions out
of python-wrapper.swig.
llvm-svn: 252803
This only begins to port python-wrapper.swig over. Since this
code can be pretty hairy, I plan to do this incrementally over a
series of patches, each time removing or converting more code
over to the PythonDataObjects code.
llvm-svn: 252788
Relying on manual Python C API calls is error prone, especially
when trying to maintain compatibility with Python 2 and Python 3.
This patch additionally fixes what appears to be a potentially
serious memory leak, in that were were incref'ing two values
returned from the session dictionary but never decref'ing them.
There was a comment indicating that it was intentional, but the
reasoning was, I believe, faulty and it resulted in a legitimate
memory leak.
Switching everything to PythonObject based classes solves both
the compatibility issues as well as the resource leak issues.
llvm-svn: 252536
Summary:
Along with this, support for an optional argument to the "num_children"
method of a Python synthetic child provider has also been added. These have
been added with the following use case in mind:
Synthetic child providers currently have a method "has_children" and
"num_children". While the former is good enough to know if there are
children, it does not give any insight into how many children there are.
Though the latter serves this purpose, calculating the number for children
of a data structure could be an O(N) operation if the data structure has N
children. The new method added in this change provide a middle ground.
One can call GetNumChildren(K) to know if a child exists at an index K
which can be as large as the callers tolerance can be. If the caller wants
to know about children beyond K, it can make an other call with 2K. If the
synthetic child provider maintains state about it counting till K
previosly, then the next call is only an O(K) operation. Infact, all
calls made progressively with steps of K will be O(K) operations.
Reviewers: vharron, clayborg, granata.enrico
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13778
llvm-svn: 250930
The order of libraries passed to the linker didn't work under linux (you
need the llvm libraries first, then the lldb libraries). I modelled this
after clang's setup here. Seemed simple enough to just be consistent.
llvm-svn: 232461
Summary:
Also, change its return type to size_t to match the return types of
its callers.
With this change, std::vector and std::list data formatter tests
pass on Linux (when using libstdc++) with clang as well as with gcc.
These tests have also been enabled in this patch.
Test Plan: dotest.py -p <TestDataFormatterStdVector|TestDataFormatterStdList>
Reviewers: vharron, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: zturner, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8337
llvm-svn: 232399
This works by creating a command backed by a class whose interface should - at least - include
def __init__(self, debugger, session_dict)
def __call__(self, args, return_obj, exe_ctx)
What works:
- adding a command via command script add --class
- calling a thusly created command
What is missing:
- support for custom help
- test cases
The missing parts will follow over the next couple of days
This is an improvement over the existing system as:
a) it provides an obvious location for commands to provide help strings (i.e. methods)
b) it allows commands to store state in an obvious fashion
c) it allows us to easily add features to script commands over time (option parsing and subcommands registration, I am looking at you :-)
llvm-svn: 232136
This works similarly to the {thread/frame/process/target.script:...} feature - you write a summary string, part of which is
${var.script:someFuncName}
someFuncName is expected to be declared as
def someFuncName(SBValue,otherArgument) - essentially the same as a summary function
Since . -> [] are the only allowed separators, and % is used for custom formatting, .script: would not be a legitimate symbol anyway, which makes this non-ambiguous
llvm-svn: 220821
The way to do this is to write a synthetic child provider for your type, and have it vend the (optional) get_value function.
If get_value is defined, and it returns a valid SBValue, that SBValue's value (as in lldb_private::Value) will be used as the synthetic ValueObject's Value
The rationale for doing things this way is twofold:
- there are many possible ways to define a "value" (SBData, a Python number, ...) but SBValue seems general enough as a thing that stores a "value", so we just trade values that way and that keeps our currency trivial
- we could introduce a new level of layering (ValueObjectSyntheticValue), a new kind of formatter (synthetic value producer), but that would complicate the model (can I have a dynamic with no synthetic children but synthetic value? synthetic value with synthetic children but no dynamic?), and I really couldn't see much benefit to be reaped from this added complexity in the matrix
On the other hand, just defining a synthetic child provider with a get_value but returning no actual children is easy enough that it's not a significant road-block to adoption of this feature
Comes with a test case
llvm-svn: 219330
the user level. It adds the ability to invent new stepping modes implemented by python classes,
and to view the current thread plan stack and to some extent alter it.
I haven't gotten to documentation or tests yet. But this should not cause any behavior changes
if you don't use it, so its safe to check it in now and work on it incrementally.
llvm-svn: 218642
PyTuple_SetItem steals a reference to the item it inserts in the tuple
This, plus the Py_XDECREF of the tuple a few lines below, causes our session dictionary to go away after the first time a SWIG layer function is called - with disastrous effects for the first subsequent attempt to use any functionality in ScriptInterpreterPython
This fixes it
llvm-svn: 200429
The many many benefits include:
1 - Input/Output/Error streams are now handled as real streams not a push style input
2 - auto completion in python embedded interpreter
3 - multi-line input for "script" and "expression" commands now allow you to edit previous/next lines using up and down arrow keys and this makes multi-line input actually a viable thing to use
4 - it is now possible to use curses to drive LLDB (please try the "gui" command)
We will need to deal with and fix any buildbot failures and tests and arise now that input/output and error are correctly hooked up in all cases.
llvm-svn: 200263
Enrico Granata
Zachary Turner
Siva Chandra
David Blaikie
Ed Maste
Jason Molenda
Jim Ingham
Greg Clayton