Summary:
LLGS leaks pipes (when launched by lldb), sockets (when launched by platform),
and/or log file to the inferior. This should prevent all possible leaks.
Reviewers: vharron, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9211
llvm-svn: 235615
The following situation occured if we were stopping a process (due to breakpoint, watchpoint, ...
hit) while a new thread was being created.
- process has two threads: A and B.
- thread A hits a breakpoint: we send a STOP signal to thread B and register a callback with
ThreadStateCoordinator to send a stop notification after the thread stops.
- thread B stops, but not due to the SIGSTOP, but on a thread creation event (of a new thread C).
We are unaware of our desire to stop, so we queue ThreadStopped and RequestResume operations
with TSC, so the thread can continue running.
- TSC receives the ThreadStopped event, sees that all threads are stopped and fires the delayed
stop notification.
- immediately after that TSC gets the RequestResume operation, so it resumes the thread.
At this point the state is inconsistent because LLDB thinks the process is stopped and will start
issuing commands to it, but one of the threads is in fact running. Things eventually break.
I address this problem by omitting the two TSC events altogether and Resuming the thread B
directly. This way the short stop is invisible to the TSC and the delayed notification will not
fire. We will fire the notification when we actually process the SIGSTOP on thread B.
When we get the initial SIGSTOP for thread C, we also resume the thread and send a
ThreadWasCreated message (is_stopped = false) to the TSC. This way, the TSC can stop the thread
on its own and handle the stop event later. This way the state of the new thread is correctly
handled as well (thanks Chaoren for the idea).
This patch also removes the synchronisation between the thread creation notifications on threads
B and C. The need for this synchronisation is unclear (the comments seem to hint that the new
thread is "fully created" only after we process both events, but I have noticed no regressions in
treating it as "created" even after just processing the initial C event), but it is a source for
many kinds of obscure races, since it introduces a new thread state "Launching" and the rest of
the code does not handle this state at all (what happens if we get a resume request from LLDB
while this thread is launching? what happens if we get a stop request? etc.).
This fixes the "spurious $O packet" problem in TestPrintStackTraces.py. However, the test remains
disabled on i386 due to the VDSO issue.
Test Plan:
TestPrintStackTraces works on x86_64. No regressions in the rest of the test suite.
Reviewers: vharron, chaoren
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9145
llvm-svn: 235579
Patch by Jaydeep Patil
Added MIPS32 and MIPS64 core revisions. This would be followed by register context and emulate-instruction for MIPS32.
DYLDRendezvous.cpp:
On Linux link map struct does not contain extra load offset field.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: bhushan, mohit.bhakkad, sagar, lldb-commits.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9190
llvm-svn: 235574
On linux-arm we use software single stepping where setting the new
breakpoint is only possible while the process is in stopped state.
This CL moves the setup code for single stepping form the SigneStep
operation into the Resum method to avoid an error when the process
already started when we want to step one of the thread.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9108
llvm-svn: 235494
Summary:
This commit moves the functionality of the operation thread into the new monitor thread. This is
required to avoid a kernel race between the two threads and I believe it actually makes the code
cleaner.
Test Plan: Ran the test suite a couple of times, no regressions.
Reviewers: ovyalov, tberghammer, vharron
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9080
llvm-svn: 235304
The arm instruction emulation handles only some of the opcode (including
all of them modifying the PC). For the rest of the instructions we can
advance the PC by the size of the instruction as they don't modify the
PC on any other way.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9076
llvm-svn: 235292
Summary:
This is the first phase of the merging of Monitor and Operation threads in NativeProcessLinux
(which is necessary since the two threads race inside Linux kernel). Here, I reimplement the
Monitor thread do use non-blocking waitpid calls, which enables later addition of code from the
operation thread.
Test Plan: Ran the test suite a couple of times, no regressions detected.
Reviewers: vharron, ovyalov, tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9048
llvm-svn: 235193
Linux arm don't support hardware stepping (neither mismatch
breakpoints). This patch implement signle stepping with doing a software
emulation of the next instruction and then setting a temporary
breakpoint at the address where the thread will stop next.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8976
llvm-svn: 234987
The automatic conversion from long int to lldb::addr_t caused sign
extension but for a register read it is an unwanted behaviour. Fix with
forcing different conversion path.
llvm-svn: 233176
Previously the remote module sepcification was fetched only from the
remote platform. With this CL if we have a remote process then we ask it
if it have any information from a given module. It is required because
on android the dynamic linker only reports the name of the SO file and
the platform can't always find it without a full path (the process can
do it based on /proc/<pid>/maps).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8547
llvm-svn: 233061
This CL change the logic used to terminate the monitor thread of
NativeProcessLinux to use a signal instead of pthread_cancel as
pthread_cancel is not supported on android.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8205
llvm-svn: 232155
This was previously initialized by ProcessGDBRemote::Initialize but lldb-server does not contain ProcessGDBRemote anymore so this needs to be initialized directly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8186
llvm-svn: 231966
Previously it was initialized by ProcessLinux but lldb-server don't
contain ProcessLinux anymore so it have to be initialized by
NativeProcessLinux also.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8080
llvm-svn: 231482
The deadlock occurred when the Attach or the Launch operation failed for
any reason.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8030
llvm-svn: 231231
Chaoren Lin
Pavel Labath
Mohit K. Bhakkad
Tamas Berghammer
Omair Javaid
Bhushan D. Attarde
Robert Flack