where we have an immediate need of a retained value.
As an exception, don't do this when the call is made as the immediate
operand of a __bridge retain. This is more in the way of a workaround
than an actual guarantee, so it's acceptable to be brittle here.
rdar://problem/9504800
llvm-svn: 134605
MaterializeTemporaryExpr captures a reference binding to a temporary
value, making explicit that the temporary value (a prvalue) needs to
be materialized into memory so that its address can be used. The
intended AST invariant here is that a reference will always bind to a
glvalue, and MaterializeTemporaryExpr will be used to convert prvalues
into glvalues for that binding to happen. For example, given
const int& r = 1.0;
The initializer of "r" will be a MaterializeTemporaryExpr whose
subexpression is an implicit conversion from the double literal "1.0"
to an integer value.
IR generation benefits most from this new node, since it was
previously guessing (badly) when to materialize temporaries for the
purposes of reference binding. There are likely more refactoring and
cleanups we could perform there, but the introduction of
MaterializeTemporaryExpr fixes PR9565, a case where IR generation
would effectively bind a const reference directly to a bitfield in a
struct. Addresses <rdar://problem/9552231>.
llvm-svn: 133521
separate aggregate temporary and then memcpy it over to the
destination. This fixes a regression I introduced with r133235, where
the compound literal on the RHS of an assignment makes use of the
structure on the LHS of the assignment.
I'm deeply suspicious of AggExprEmitter::VisitBinAssign()'s
optimization where it emits the RHS of an aggregate assignment
directly into the LHS lvalue without checking whether there is any
aliasing between the LHS/RHS. However, I'm not in a position to
revisit this now.
Big thanks to Eli for finding the regression!
llvm-svn: 133261
C++, which means:
- binding the temporary as needed in Sema, so that we generate the
appropriate call to the destructor, and
- emitting the compound literal into the appropriate location for
the aggregate, rather than trying to emit it as a temporary and
memcpy() it.
Fixes PR10138 / <rdar://problem/9615901>.
llvm-svn: 133235
Language-design credit goes to a lot of people, but I particularly want
to single out Blaine Garst and Patrick Beard for their contributions.
Compiler implementation credit goes to Argyrios, Doug, Fariborz, and myself,
in no particular order.
llvm-svn: 133103
-C++ objects with user-declared constructor don't need zero'ing.
-We can zero-initialize arrays of C++ objects in "bulk" now, in which case don't zero-initialize each object again.
llvm-svn: 130453
double data[20000000] = {0};
we would blow out the memory by creating 20M Exprs to fill out the initializer.
To fix this, if the initializer list initializes an array with more elements than
there are initializers in the list, have InitListExpr store a single 'ArrayFiller' expression
that specifies an expression to be used for value initialization of the rest of the elements.
Fixes rdar://9275920.
llvm-svn: 129896
because the result is ignored. The particular example here is with
property l-values, but there could be all sorts of lovely casts that this
isn't safe for. Sink the check into the one case that seems to actually
be capable of honoring this.
llvm-svn: 129397
for __unknown_anytype resolution to destructively modify the AST. So that's
what it does now, which significantly simplifies some of the implementation.
Normal member calls work pretty cleanly now, and I added support for
propagating unknown-ness through &.
llvm-svn: 129331
represents a dynamic cast where we know that the result is always null.
For example:
struct A {
virtual ~A();
};
struct B final : A { };
struct C { };
bool f(B* b) {
return dynamic_cast<C*>(b);
}
llvm-svn: 129256
John McCall
Douglas Gregor
Alexis Hunt
Fariborz Jahanian
Argyrios Kyrtzidis
Ken Dyck
Peter Collingbourne
Anders Carlsson