This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
Summary: This removes most of unnecessary includes in the `source/Commands` directory. This was generated by IWYU and a script that fixed all the bogus reports from IWYU. Patch is tested on Linux and macOS.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: krytarowski, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71489
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374631
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374626
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374622
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374620
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374609
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 374584
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 373931
The StringRef should always be identical to the C string, so we
might as well just create the StringRef from the C-string. This
might be slightly slower until we implement the storage of ArgEntry
with a string instead of a std::unique_ptr<char[]>. Until then we
have to do the additional strlen on the C string to construct the
StringRef.
llvm-svn: 371842
Summary:
We currently have a bunch of code that is supposed to handle invalid command options, but
all this code is unreachable because invalid options are already handled in `Options::Parse`.
The only way we can reach this code is when we declare but then not implement an option
(which will be made impossible with D65386, which is also when we can completely remove
the `default` cases).
This patch replaces all this code with `llvm_unreachable` to make clear this is dead code
that can't be reached.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66522
llvm-svn: 369625
Summary:
We still have some leftovers of the old completion API in the internals of
LLDB that haven't been replaced by the new CompletionRequest. These leftovers
are:
* The return values (int/size_t) in all completion functions.
* Our result array that starts indexing at 1.
* `WordComplete` mode.
I didn't replace them back then because it's tricky to figure out what exactly they
are used for and the completion code is relatively untested. I finally got around
to writing more tests for the API and understanding the semantics, so I think it's
a good time to get rid of them.
A few words why those things should be removed/replaced:
* The return values are really cryptic, partly redundant and rarely documented.
They are also completely ignored by Xcode, so whatever information they contain will end up
breaking Xcode's completion mechanism. They are also partly impossible to even implement
as we assign negative values special meaning and our completion API sometimes returns size_t.
Completion functions are supposed to return -2 to rewrite the current line. We seem to use this
in some untested code path to expand the history repeat character to the full command, but
I haven't figured out why that doesn't work at the moment.
Completion functions return -1 to 'insert the completion character', but that isn't implemented
(even though we seem to activate this feature in LLDB sometimes).
All positive values have to match the number of results. This is obviously just redundant information
as the user can just look at the result list to get that information (which is what Xcode does).
* The result array that starts indexing at 1 is obviously unexpected. The first element of the array is
reserved for the common prefix of all completions (e.g. "foobar" and "footar" -> "foo"). The idea is
that we calculate this to make the life of the API caller easier, but obviously forcing people to have
1-based indices is not helpful (or even worse, forces them to manually copy the results to make it
0-based like Xcode has to do).
* The `WordComplete` mode indicates that LLDB should enter a space behind the completion. The
idea is that we let the top-level API know that we just provided a full completion. Interestingly we
`WordComplete` is just a single bool that somehow represents all N completions. And we always
provide full completions in LLDB, so in theory it should always be true.
The only use it currently serves is providing redundant information about whether we have a single
definitive completion or not (which we already know from the number of results we get).
This patch essentially removes `WordComplete` mode and makes the result array indexed from 0.
It also removes all return values from all internal completion functions. The only non-redundant information
they contain is about rewriting the current line (which is broken), so that functionality was moved
to the CompletionRequest API. So you can now do `addCompletion("blub", "description", CompletionMode::RewriteLine)`
to do the same.
For the SB API we emulate the old behaviour by making the array indexed from 1 again with the common
prefix at index 0. I didn't keep the special negative return codes as we either never sent them before (e.g. -2) or we
didn't even implement them in the Editline handler (e.g. -1).
I tried to keep this patch minimal and I'm aware we can probably now even further simplify a bunch of related code,
but I would prefer doing this in follow-up NFC commits
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66536
llvm-svn: 369624
Summary:
Right now our CommandOptions.inc only generates the initializer for the options list but
not the array declaration boilerplate around it. As the array definition is identical for all arrays,
we might as well also let the CommandOptions.inc generate it alongside the initializers.
This patch will also allow us to generate additional declarations related to that option list in
the future (e.g. a enum class representing the specific options which would make our
handling code less prone).
This patch also fixes a few option tables that didn't follow our naming style.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65331
llvm-svn: 367186
We dynamically allocate the option validator which means we
can't mark this list of OptionDefinitions as constexpr. It's also
more complicated than necessary.
llvm-svn: 367102
Benjamin Kramer
Raphael Isemann
Adrian Prantl
Walter Erquinigo
Shafik Yaghmour