Re-landing this now that (hopefully) all the failures this caused on the
bots have been addressed.
This patch changes the behavior of the substrs argument to self.expect.
Currently, the elements of substrs are unordered and as long as the
string appears in the output, the assertion passes.
We can be more precise by requiring that the substrings be ordered in
the way they appear. My hope is that this will make it harder to
accidentally pass a check because a string appears out of order.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73766
Value::GetValueByteSize() reports the size of a Value as the size of its
underlying CompilerType. However, a host buffer that backs a Value may
be smaller than GetValueByteSize().
This situation arises when the host is only able to partially evaluate a
Value, e.g. because the expression contains DW_OP_piece.
The cleanest fix I've found to this problem is Greg's suggestion, which
is to resize the Value if (after evaluating an expression) it's found to
be too small. I've tried several alternatives which all (in one way or
the other) tried to teach the Value/ValueObjectChild system not to read
past the end of a host buffer, but this was flaky and impractical as it
isn't easy to figure out the host buffer's size (Value::GetScalar() can
point to somewhere /inside/ a host buffer, but you need to walk up the
ValueObject hierarchy to try and find its size).
This fixes an ASan error in lldb seen when debugging a clang binary.
I've added a regression test in test/functionalities/optimized_code. The
point of that test is not specifically to check that DW_OP_piece is
handled a particular way, but rather to check that lldb doesn't crash on
an input that it used to crash on.
Testing: check-lldb, and running the added tests using a sanitized lldb
--
Thanks to Jim for pointing out that an earlier version of this patch,
which simply changed the definition of Value::GetValueByteSize(), would
interact poorly with the ValueObject machinery.
Thanks also to Pavel who suggested a neat way to test this change
(which, incidentally, caught another ASan issue still present in the
original version of this patch).
rdar://58665925
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73148
Specializations of the Platform class print the kernel after calling the
super method. By printing the kernel at the end in the super class, we
guarantee the order is the same on different platforms.
This patch changes the behavior of the substrs argument to self.expect.
Currently, the elements of substrs are unordered and as long as the
string appears in the output, the assertion passes.
We can be more precise by requiring that the substrings be ordered in
the way they appear. My hope is that this will make it harder to
accidentally pass a check because a string appears out of order.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73766
Currently the substrs parameter takes a list of strings that need to be
found but the ordering isn't checked. D73766 might change that so this
changes a several tests so that the order of the strings in the substrs
list is in the order in which they appear in the output.
Currently the substrs parameter takes a list of strings that need to be
found but the ordering isn't checked. D73766 might change that so this
changes a several tests so that the order of the strings in the substrs
list is in the order in which they appear in the output.
Currently the substrs parameter takes a list of strings that need to be
found but the ordering isn't checked. D73766 might change that so this
changes a several tests so that the order of the strings in the substrs
list is in the order in which they appear in the output.
Currently the substrs parameter takes a list of strings that need to be
found but the ordering isn't checked. D73766 might change that so this
changes a several tests so that the order of the strings in the substrs
list is in the order in which they appear in the output.
Currently the substrs parameter takes a list of strings
that need to be found but the ordering isn't checked. D73766
might change that so this changes a several tests so that
the order of the strings in the substrs list is in the order
in which they appear in the output.
Currently if 'expect' fails and a custom msg is supplied, then lldbtest
will not print the actual command output. This makes it impossible to know
why the test actually failed. This just prints the command output even
if the msg parameter was supplied.
Summary:
There was a bug on LLDB VSCode where there was the following behavior:
//Code
```
struct foo {
int bar:
};
...
foo my_foo = {10};
```
Trying to auto-complete my_foo.b with my_foo.bar resulted instead with my_foo.my_foo.bar
This diff fixes this bug and adds some tests to check correct behavior.
It also fixes the same bug using the arrow operator (->) when user manually requests completions.
TODO: Fix bug where no recommended completions are automatically shown with arrow operator
{F11249959}
{F11249958}
Reviewers: wallace
Reviewed By: wallace
Subscribers: teemperor, labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73506
Summary:
Currently we crash in Clang's CodeGen when we call functions with covariant return types with this assert:
```
Assertion failed: (DD && "queried property of class with no definition"), function data, file clang/include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h, line 433.
```
when calling `clang::CXXRecordDecl::isDerivedFrom` from the `ItaniumVTableBuilder`.
Clang seems to assume that the underlying record decls of covariant return types are already completed.
This is true during a normal Clang invocation as there the type checker will complete both decls when
checking if the overloaded function is valid (i.e., the return types are covariant).
When we minimally import our AST into the expression in LLDB we don't do this type checking (which
would complete the record decls) and we end up trying to access the invalid record decls from CodeGen
which makes us trigger the assert.
This patch just completes the underlying types of ptr/ref return types of virtual function so that the
underlying records are complete and we behave as Clang expects us to do.
Fixes rdar://38048657
Reviewers: lhames, shafik
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73024
When a thread stops, this checks depending on the platform if the top frame is
an abort stack frame. If so, it looks for an assert stack frame in the upper
frames and set it as the most relavant frame when found.
To do so, the StackFrameRecognizer class holds a "Most Relevant Frame" and a
"cooked" stop reason description. When the thread is about to stop, it checks
if the current frame is recognized, and if so, it fetches the recognized frame's
attributes and applies them.
rdar://58528686
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73303
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Jonas Devlieghere
Jason Molenda
Davide Italiano
Vedant Kumar
Michał Górny
Raphael Isemann
Hector Diaz
Med Ismail Bennani