Fix was:
1) Had to regenerate dwarfdump-test-zlib.elf-x86-64, dwarfdump-test-zlib-gnu.elf-x86-64
(because llvm-symbolizer-zlib.test uses that inputs for its purposes and failed).
2) Updated llvm-symbolizer-zlib.test (updated used call function address to match new files +
added one more check for newly created dwarfdump-test-zlib-gnu.elf-x86-64 binary input).
3) Updated comment in dwarfdump-test-zlib.cc.
Original commit message:
[llvm-dwarfdump] - Teach dwarfdump to decompress debug sections in zlib style.
Before this llvm-dwarfdump only recognized zlib-gnu compression style of headers,
this patch adds support for zlib style.
It looks reasonable to support both styles for dumping,
even if we are not going to suport generating of deprecated gnu one.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20470
llvm-svn: 270557
fix: forgot to commit the updated dwarfdump-test-zlib.elf-x86-64
Original commit message:
[llvm-dwarfdump] - Teach dwarfdump to decompress debug sections in zlib style.
Before this llvm-dwarfdump only recognized zlib-gnu compression style of headers,
this patch adds support for zlib style.
It looks reasonable to support both styles for dumping,
even if we are not going to suport generating of deprecated gnu one.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20470
llvm-svn: 270543
Before this llvm-dwarfdump only recognized zlib-gnu compression style of headers,
this patch adds support for zlib style.
It looks reasonable to support both styles for dumping,
even if we are not going to suport generating of deprecated gnu one.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20470
llvm-svn: 270540
part of the error message.
As the caller is the one that needs to add the name of where the "object file"
comes from to the error message as the object file could be in an archive, or
coming from a slice of a Mach-O universal file or a buffer created by a JIT.
In the cases of a Mach-O universal file the architecture name may or may not
also need to be printed which is up to the tool code. For example if the tool
code is only selecting the host architecture slice then that architecture name
is never printed.
This patch is the change to the libObject code and there will be follow on
commits for changes to the code for each tool.
llvm-svn: 268789
load commands.
The existing test case in test/Object/macho-invalid.test for
macho-invalid-too-small-segment-load-command has a cmdsize of 55, while
being too small also it is not a multiple of 4. So when that check is added
this test case will produce a different error. So I constructed a new test case
that will trigger the intended error.
I also changed the error message to be consistent with the other malformed Mach-O
file error messages which prints the load command index. I also removed both
object_error::macho_load_segment_too_small and
object_error::macho_load_segment_too_many_sections from Object/Error.h
as they are not needed and can just use object_error::parse_failed and let the
error message string distinguish the specific error.
llvm-svn: 268652
command has a size less than 8 bytes.
I think the existing test case in test/Object/macho-invalid.test for
macho64-invalid-too-small-load-command was trying to test for this but that
test case triggered a different error given how it was constructed. So I
constructed a new test case that would trigger this specific error.
I also changed the error message to be consistent with the other malformed Mach-O
file error messages. I also removed object_error::macho_small_load_command from
Object/Error.h as it is not needed and can just use object_error::parse_failed
and let the error message string distinguish the error.
llvm-svn: 268463
command other than the first one is past the end of the load commands.
This is like the test case in test/Object/macho-invalid.test for
macho64-invalid-incomplete-load-command but it is the second load command
that is past the end of all the load commands instead of the first.
The code in the constructor for MachOObjectFile that loops over the load
commands used getNextLoadCommandInfo() which was not producing
a good error message. So that was fixed and a test case was added.
llvm-svn: 268403
Produce another specific error message for a malformed Mach-O file when a symbol’s
section index is more than the number of sections. The existing test case in test/Object/macho-invalid.test
for macho-invalid-section-index-getSectionRawName now reports the error with the message indicating
that a symbol at a specific index has a bad section index and that bad section index value.
Again converting interfaces to Expected<> from ErrorOr<> does involve
touching a number of places. Where the existing code reported the error with a
string message or an error code it was converted to do the same.
Also there some were bugs in the existing code that did not deal with the
old ErrorOr<> return values. So now with Expected<> since they must be
checked and the error handled, I added a TODO and a comment:
"// TODO: Actually report errors helpfully" and a call something like
consumeError(NameOrErr.takeError()) so the buggy code will not crash
since needed to deal with the Error.
llvm-svn: 268298
Only one consumer (llvm-objdump) actually cared about the fact that there were
two triples. Others were actively working around the fact that the Triple
returned by getArch might have been invalid. As for llvm-objdump, it needs to
be acutely aware of both Triples anyway, so being generic in the exposed API is
no benefit.
Also rename the version of getArch returning a Triple. Users were having to
pass an unwanted nullptr to disambiguate the two, which was nasty.
The only functional change here is that armv7m and armv7em object files no
longer crash llvm-objdump.
llvm-svn: 267249
Produce another specific error message for a malformed Mach-O file when a symbol’s
string index is past the end of the string table. The existing test case in test/Object/macho-invalid.test
for macho-invalid-symbol-name-past-eof now reports the error with the message indicating
that a symbol at a specific index has a bad sting index and that bad string index value.
Again converting interfaces to Expected<> from ErrorOr<> does involve
touching a number of places. Where the existing code reported the error with a
string message or an error code it was converted to do the same. There is some
code for this that could be factored into a routine but I would like to leave that for
the code owners post-commit to do as they want for handling an llvm::Error. An
example of how this could be done is shown in the diff in
lib/ExecutionEngine/RuntimeDyld/RuntimeDyldImpl.h which had a Check() routine
already for std::error_code so I added one like it for llvm::Error .
Also there some were bugs in the existing code that did not deal with the
old ErrorOr<> return values. So now with Expected<> since they must be
checked and the error handled, I added a TODO and a comment:
“// TODO: Actually report errors helpfully” and a call something like
consumeError(NameOrErr.takeError()) so the buggy code will not crash
since needed to deal with the Error.
Note there fixes needed to lld that goes along with this that I will commit right after this.
So expect lld not to built after this commit and before the next one.
llvm-svn: 266919
And update the existing test cases in test/Object/macho-invalid.test
to use llvm-objdump with the -macho option to produce these
error messages and stop producing the generic "Invalid data
was encountered while parsing the file" message.
Working from the beginning of the file, if the mach header is too large for
the size of the file and then if the load commands that follow extend past
the end of the file these two errors now generate correct error messages.
Both of these have existing test cases in test/Object/macho-invalid.test .
But the first with macho-invalid-header it will never trigger the error message
"mach header extends past the end of the file" using any of the llvm tools as
they all use identify_magic() which rejects files with the correct magic number
that are too small in size. So I tested this by hacking that code and seeing the
error message down in parseHeader() really does happen. So in case there
is ever code in llvm that directly calls createMachOObjectFile() this error
message will be correctly produced.
The second error message of "load commands extends past the end of the file"
is triggered by a number of existing tests cases in test/Object/macho-invalid.test .
Also other tests trigger different error messages now like "ilocalsym plus
nlocalsym in LC_DYSYMTAB load command extends past the end of the
symbol table".
There are two existing test cases that still get the "Invalid data was encountered ..."
error messages that I will tackle next. But they will involve a bit of pluming an
Expect<...> up through the call stack and I want to do those as separate changes.
FYI, for those test cases that were trying to test specific errors that now get
different errors I’ll fix those in follow on changes and create new test cases
for those so they test the error they were meant to test.
llvm-svn: 266248
Produce the first specific error message for a malformed Mach-O file describing
the problem instead of the generic message for object_error::parse_failed of
"Invalid data was encountered while parsing the file”. Many more good error
messages will follow after this first one.
This is built on Lang Hames’ great work of adding the ’Error' class for
structured error handling and threading Error through MachOObjectFile
construction. And making createMachOObjectFile return Expected<...> .
So to to get the error to the llvm-obdump tool, I changed the stack of
these methods to also return Expected<...> :
object::ObjectFile::createObjectFile()
object::SymbolicFile::createSymbolicFile()
object::createBinary()
Then finally in ParseInputMachO() in MachODump.cpp the error can
be reported and the specific error message can be printed in llvm-objdump
and can be seen in the existing test case for the existing malformed binary
but with the updated error message.
Converting these interfaces to Expected<> from ErrorOr<> does involve
touching a number of places. To contain the changes for now use of
errorToErrorCode() and errorOrToExpected() are used where the callers
are yet to be converted.
Also there some were bugs in the existing code that did not deal with the
old ErrorOr<> return values. So now with Expected<> since they must be
checked and the error handled, I added a TODO and a comment:
“// TODO: Actually report errors helpfully” and a call something like
consumeError(ObjOrErr.takeError()) so the buggy code will not crash
since needed to deal with the Error.
Note there is one fix also needed to lld/COFF/InputFiles.cpp that goes along
with this that I will commit right after this. So expect lld not to built
after this commit and before the next one.
llvm-svn: 265606
method instead.
This is not quite a named constructor: Construction may fail, and
MachOObjectFiles are usually passed by unique_ptr anyway, so create
returns an Expected<std::unique_ptr<MachOObjectFile>>.
llvm-svn: 264469
George Rimar
Kevin Enderby
Justin Bogner
Tim Northover
Evgeniy Stepanov
David Blaikie
Lang Hames