This:
a) teaches PythonCallable to look inside a callable object
b) teaches PythonCallable to discover whether a callable method is bound
c) teaches lldb.command to dispatch to either the older 4 argument version or the newer 5 argument version
llvm-svn: 273640
The explicit APIs on SBValue obviously remain if one wants to be explicit in intent, or override this guess, but since __int__() has to pick one, an educated guess is definitely better than than always going to signed regardless
Fixes rdar://24556976
llvm-svn: 260349
Fixed a crash that would happen if you tried to get the name of a constructor or destructor by calling "getDeclName()" instead of calling getName() (which would assert and crash).
Added the ability to get function arguments names from SBFunction.
llvm-svn: 252622
On a suggestion from Jim Ingham, this class allows you to very easily define synthetic child providers that return a synthetic value (in the sense of r219330), but no children
Also, document this new feature in our www docs
llvm-svn: 219337
The many many benefits include:
1 - Input/Output/Error streams are now handled as real streams not a push style input
2 - auto completion in python embedded interpreter
3 - multi-line input for "script" and "expression" commands now allow you to edit previous/next lines using up and down arrow keys and this makes multi-line input actually a viable thing to use
4 - it is now possible to use curses to drive LLDB (please try the "gui" command)
We will need to deal with and fix any buildbot failures and tests and arise now that input/output and error are correctly hooked up in all cases.
llvm-svn: 200263
There are two new classes:
lldb::SBModuleSpec
lldb::SBModuleSpecList
The SBModuleSpec wraps up a lldb_private::ModuleSpec, and SBModuleSpecList wraps up a lldb_private::ModuleSpecList.
llvm-svn: 185877
The script was able to point out and save 40 bytes in each lldb_private::Section by being very careful where we need to have virtual destructors and also by re-ordering members.
llvm-svn: 184364
@lldb.command("new_command", "Documentation string for new_command...")
def new_command(debugger, command, result, dict):
....
No more need to register your command in the __lldb_init_module function!
llvm-svn: 184274
SWIG is smart enough to recognize that C++ operators == and != mean __eq__ and __ne__ in Python and do the appropriate translation
But it is not smart enough to recognize that mySBObject == None should return False instead of erroring out
The %pythoncode blocks are meant to provide those extra smarts (and they play some SWIG&Python magic to find the right function to call behind the scenes with no risk of typos :-)
Lastly, SBBreakpoint provides an == but never provided a != operator - common courtesy is to provide both
llvm-svn: 180987
Making value objects properly iterable in constructs of the form
[ x for x in value_with_children ]
This would previously cause an endless loop because lacking a proper iterator object, Python will keep calling __getitem__() with increasing values of the index until it gets an IndexError
since SBValue::GetValueForExpressionPath() supports synthetic array members, no array index will ever really cause an IndexError to be raised, hence the endless iteration
class value_iter is an implementation of __iter__() that provides a terminating iterator over a value
llvm-svn: 177885
It is replaced by a Print("str") call which is equivalent to Printf("%s","str")
- Providing file-like behavior for SBStream with appropriate extension write() and flush() calls, plus documenting that these are only meant and only exist for Python
Documenting the file-like behavior on our website
llvm-svn: 177877
Exports write() and flush() from SBCommandReturnObject to enable file-like output from Python commands.
e.g.:
def ls(debugger, command, result, internal_dict):
print >>result,”just “some output”
will produce
(lldb) ls
just “some output
(lldb)
llvm-svn: 177807
starting lldb I get
% ./lldb -x
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
File "/private/tmp/build/Debug/LLDB.framework/Versions/A/Resources/Python/lldb/__init__.py", line 9008
raise TypeError("No array item of type %s" % str(type(key)))
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
NameError: name 'run_one_line' is not defined
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
NameError: name 'run_one_line' is not defined
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
NameError: name 'run_one_line' is not defined
(lldb)
I did a clean build and still got the problem so I'm backing this out until Enrico can
look at it.
llvm-svn: 165356
- Tweaked a parameter name in SBDebugger.h so my typemap will catch it;
- Added a SBDebugger.Create(bool, callback, baton) to the swig interface;
- Added SBDebugger.SetLoggingCallback to the swig interface;
- Added a callback utility function for log callbacks;
- Guard against Py_None on both callback utility functions;
- Added a FIXME to the SBDebugger API test;
- Added a __del__() stub for SBDebugger.
We need to be able to get both the log callback and baton from an
SBDebugger if we want to protect against memory leaks (or make the user
responsible for holding another reference to the callback).
Additionally, it's impossible to revert from a callback-backed log
mechanism to a file-backed log mechanism.
llvm-svn: 162633
Now it's possible to use SBInputReader callbacks in Python.
We leak the callback object, unfortunately. A __del__ method can be added
to SBInputReader, but we have no way to check the callback function that
is on the reader. So we can't call Py_DECREF on it when we have our
PythonCallback function. One way to do it is to assume that reified
SBInputReaders always have a Python callback (and always call Py_DECREF).
Another one is to add methods or properties to SBInputReader (or make the
m_callback_function property public).
llvm-svn: 162356
Greg Clayton
Enrico Granata
Zachary Turner
Todd Fiala
Jason Molenda
Filipe Cabecinhas