lldb::addr_t SBFrame::GetCFA();
This gets the CFA (call frame address) of the frame so it allows us to take an address that is on the stack and figure out which thread it comes from.
Also modified the heap.py module to be able to find out which variable in a frame's stack frame contains an address. This way when ptr_refs finds a match on the stack, it get then report which variable contains the pointer.
llvm-svn: 238393
Summary:
sc.block->AppendVariables(...) returns 0 if there are no arguments or local
variables, but we still need to check for global variables.
Test Plan:
```
$ cat test.cpp
int i;
int main() {
}
$ lldb test -o 'b main' -o r
(lldb) script
>>> print lldb.frame.FindValue('i', lldb.eValueTypeVariableGlobal)
(int) i = 0 # as opposed to "No value"
```
Reviewers: jingham, ovyalov, vharron, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8464
llvm-svn: 232767
Reverting this commit led to other failures which I did not see at
first. This turned out to be an easy problem to fix, so I added
SBVariablesOptions.cpp to the CMakeLists.txt. In the future please
try to make sure new files are added to CMake.
llvm-svn: 229516
We talked about it internally - and came to the conclusion that it's time to have an options class
This commit adds an SBVariablesOptions class and goes through all the required dance
llvm-svn: 228975
A runtime support value is a ValueObject whose only purpose is to support some language runtime's operation, but it does not directly provide any user-visible benefit
As such, unless the user is working on the runtime support, it is mostly safe for them not to see such a value when debugging
It is a language runtime's job to check whether a ValueObject is a support value, and that - in conjunction with a target setting - is used by frame variable and target variable
SBFrame::GetVariables gets a new overload with yet another flag to dictate whether to return those support values to the caller - that which defaults to the setting's value
rdar://problem/15539930
llvm-svn: 228791
Add a callback that will allow an expression to be cancelled between the
expression evaluation stages (for the ClangUserExpressions.)
<rdar://problem/16790467>, <rdar://problem/16573440>
llvm-svn: 207944
This is a purely mechanical change explicitly casting any parameters for printf
style conversion. This cleans up the warnings emitted by gcc 4.8 on Linux.
llvm-svn: 205607
Fix a bug where calling SBFrame::FindValue() would cause a copy of all variables in the block to be inserted in the frame's variable list, regardless of whether those same variables were there or not - which means one could end up with a frame with lots of duplicate copies of the same variables
llvm-svn: 201614
pure virtual base class and made StackFrame a subclass of that. As
I started to build on top of that arrangement today, I found that it
wasn't working out like I intended. Instead I'll try sticking with
the single StackFrame class -- there's too much code duplication to
make a more complicated class hierarchy sensible I think.
llvm-svn: 193983
defines a protocol that all subclasses will implement. StackFrame
is currently the only subclass and the methods that Frame vends are
nearly identical to StackFrame's old methods.
Update all callers to use Frame*/Frame& instead of pointers to
StackFrames.
This is almost entirely a mechanical change that touches a lot of
the code base so I'm committing it alone. No new functionality is
added with this patch, no new subclasses of Frame exist yet.
I'll probably need to tweak some of the separation, possibly moving
some of StackFrame's methods up in to Frame, but this is a good
starting point.
<rdar://problem/15314068>
llvm-svn: 193907
LLDB is crashing when logging is enabled from lldb-perf-clang. This has to do with the global destructor chain as the process and its threads are being torn down.
All logging channels now make one and only one instance that is kept in a global pointer which is never freed. This guarantees that logging can correctly continue as the process tears itself down.
llvm-svn: 178191
SBValueList was backed by a ValueObjectList. This caused us to lose track of the additional metadata in the ValueImpl that backs SBValue.
This checkin fixes that by backing SBValueList with ValueListImpl (that essentially wraps a vector<SBValue>).
llvm-svn: 174638
the frame and then getting the run lock. Which means that our frame could have gotten
invalidated by stopping between the time we got the frame and assured the the target was
stopped. Now we get the run lock first, and THEN resolve the underlying frame object.
<rdar://problem/12621607>
llvm-svn: 168838
Given our implementation of ValueObjects we could have a scenario where a ValueObject has a dynamic type of Foo* at one point, and then its dynamic type changes to Bar*
If Bar* has synthetic children enabled, by the time we figure that out, our public API is already vending SBValues wrapping a DynamicVO, instead of a SyntheticVO and there was
no trivial way for us to change the SP inside an SBValue on the fly
This checkin reimplements SBValue in terms of a wrapper, ValueImpl, that allows this substitutions on-the-fly by overriding GetSP() to do The Right Thing (TM)
As an additional bonus, GetNonSyntheticValue() now works, and we can get rid of the ForceDisableSyntheticChildren idiom in ScriptInterpreterPython
Lastly, this checkin makes sure the synthetic VOs get the correct m_value and m_data from their parents (prevented summaries from working in some cases)
llvm-svn: 166426
Greg Clayton
Chaoren Lin
Zachary Turner
Enrico Granata
Jim Ingham
Saleem Abdulrasool
Jason Molenda
Daniel Malea