This scheme checks that pointer and lvalue casts are made to an object of
the correct dynamic type; that is, the dynamic type of the object must be
a derived class of the pointee type of the cast. The checks are currently
only introduced where the class being casted to is a polymorphic class.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8312
llvm-svn: 232241
I disabled putting the new global into the same COMDAT as the function for now.
There's a fundamental problem when we inline references to the global but still
have the global in a COMDAT linked to the inlined function. Since this is only
an optimization there may be other versions of the COMDAT around that are
missing the new global and hell breaks loose at link time.
I hope the chromium build doesn't break this time :)
llvm-svn: 231564
This broke the Chromium build. Links were failing with messages like:
obj/dbus/libdbus_test_support.a(obj/dbus/dbus_test_support.mock_object_proxy.o):../../dbus/mock_object_proxy.cc:function dbus::MockObjectProxy::Detach(): warning: relocation refers to discarded section
/usr/local/google/work/chromium/src/third_party/binutils/Linux_x64/Release/bin/ld.gold: error: treating warnings as errors
llvm-svn: 231541
Instead of creating a copy on the stack just stash them in a private
constant global. This saves both the copying overhead and the stack
space, and gives the optimizer more room to constant fold.
This tries to make array temporaries more similar to regular arrays,
they can't use the same logic because a temporary has no VarDecl to be
bound to so we roll our own version here.
The original use case for this optimization was code like
for (int i : {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10})
foo(i);
where without this patch (assuming that the loop is not unrolled) we
would alloca an array on the stack, copy the 10 values over and
iterate on that. With this patch we put the array in .text use it
directly. Apart from that case this helps on virtually any passing of
a constant std::initializer_list as a function argument.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8034
llvm-svn: 231508
Bools are a little tricky, they are i8 in memory and must be coerced
back to i1 before further operations can be performed on them.
This fixes PR22577.
llvm-svn: 229204
The /volatile:ms semantics turn volatile loads and stores into atomic
acquire and release operations. This distinction is important because
volatile memory operations do not form a happens-before relationship
with non-atomic memory. This means that a volatile store is not
sufficient for implementing a mutex unlock routine.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7580
llvm-svn: 229082
This causes things like assignment to refer to the '=' rather than the
LHS when attributing the store instruction, for example.
There were essentially 3 options for this:
* The beginning of an expression (this was the behavior prior to this
commit). This meant that stepping through subexpressions would bounce
around from subexpressions back to the start of the outer expression,
etc. (eg: x + y + z would go x, y, x, z, x (the repeated 'x's would be
where the actual addition occurred)).
* The end of an expression. This seems to be what GCC does /mostly/, and
certainly this for function calls. This has the advantage that
progress is always 'forwards' (never jumping backwards - except for
independent subexpressions if they're evaluated in interesting orders,
etc). "x + y + z" would go "x y z" with the additions occurring at y
and z after the respective loads.
The problem with this is that the user would still have to think
fairly hard about precedence to realize which subexpression is being
evaluated or which operator overload is being called in, say, an asan
backtrace.
* The preferred location or 'exprloc'. In this case you get sort of what
you'd expect, though it's a bit confusing in its own way due to going
'backwards'. In this case the locations would be: "x y + z +" in
lovely postfix arithmetic order. But this does mean that if the op+
were an operator overload, say, and in a backtrace, the backtrace will
point to the exact '+' that's being called, not to the end of one of
its operands.
(actually the operator overload case doesn't work yet for other reasons,
but that's being fixed - but this at least gets scalar/complex
assignments and other plain operators right)
llvm-svn: 227027
This workaround was to provide unique call sites to ensure LLVM's inline
debug info handling would properly unique two calls to the same function
on the same line. Instead, this has now been fixed in LLVM (r226736) and
the workaround here can be removed.
Originally committed in r176895, but this isn't a straight revert due to
all the changes since then. I just searched for anything ForcedColumn*
related and removed them.
We could test this - but it didn't strike me as terribly valuable once
we're no longer adding this workaround everything just works as expected
& it's no longer a special case to test for.
llvm-svn: 226738
Sorry for the noise, I managed to miss a bunch of recent regressions of
include orderings here. This should actually sort all the includes for
Clang. Again, no functionality changed, this is just a mechanical
cleanup that I try to run periodically to keep the #include lines as
regular as possible across the project.
llvm-svn: 225979
Several pieces of code were relying on implicit debug location setting
which usually lead to incorrect line information anyway. So I've fixed
those (in r225955 and r225845) separately which should pave the way for
this commit to be cleanly reapplied.
The reason these implicit dependencies resulted in crashes with this
patch is that the debug location would no longer implicitly leak from
one place to another, but be set back to invalid. Once a call with
no/invalid location was emitted, if that call was ever inlined it could
produce invalid debugloc chains and assert during LLVM's codegen.
There may be further cases of such bugs in this patch - they're hard to
flush out with regression testing, so I'll keep an eye out for reports
and investigate/fix them ASAP if they come up.
Original commit message:
Reapply "DebugInfo: Generalize debug info location handling"
Originally committed in r224385 and reverted in r224441 due to concerns
this change might've introduced a crash. Turns out this change fixes the
crash introduced by one of my earlier more specific location handling
changes (those specific fixes are reverted by this patch, in favor of
the more general solution).
Recommitted in r224941 and reverted in r224970 after it caused a crash
when building compiler-rt. Looks to be due to this change zeroing out
the debug location when emitting default arguments (which were meant to
inherit their outer expression's location) thus creating call
instructions without locations - these create problems for inlining and
must not be created. That is fixed and tested in this version of the
change.
Original commit message:
This is a more scalable (fixed in mostly one place, rather than many
places that will need constant improvement/maintenance) solution to
several commits I've made recently to increase source fidelity for
subexpressions.
This resetting had to be done at the DebugLoc level (not the
SourceLocation level) to preserve scoping information (if the resetting
was done with CGDebugInfo::EmitLocation, it would've caused the tail end
of an expression's codegen to end up in a potentially different scope
than the start, even though it was at the same source location). The
drawback to this is that it might leave CGDebugInfo out of sync. Ideally
CGDebugInfo shouldn't have a duplicate sense of the current
SourceLocation, but for now it seems it does... - I don't think I'm
going to tackle removing that just now.
I expect this'll probably cause some more buildbot fallout & I'll
investigate that as it comes up.
Also these sort of improvements might be starting to show a weakness/bug
in LLVM's line table handling: we don't correctly emit is_stmt for
statements, we just put it on every line table entry. This means one
statement split over multiple lines appears as multiple 'statements' and
two statements on one line (without column info) are treated as one
statement.
I don't think we have any IR representation of statements that would
help us distinguish these cases and identify the beginning of each
statement - so that might be something we need to add (possibly to the
lexical scope chain - a scope for each statement). This does cause some
problems for GDB and possibly other DWARF consumers.
llvm-svn: 225956
Introduce the following -fsanitize-recover flags:
- -fsanitize-recover=<list>: Enable recovery for selected checks or
group of checks. It is forbidden to explicitly list unrecoverable
sanitizers here (that is, "address", "unreachable", "return").
- -fno-sanitize-recover=<list>: Disable recovery for selected checks or
group of checks.
- -f(no-)?sanitize-recover is now a synonym for
-f(no-)?sanitize-recover=undefined,integer and will soon be deprecated.
These flags are parsed left to right, and mask of "recoverable"
sanitizer is updated accordingly, much like what we do for -fsanitize= flags.
-fsanitize= and -fsanitize-recover= flag families are independent.
CodeGen change: If there is a single UBSan handler function, responsible
for implementing multiple checks, which have different recoverable setting,
then we emit two handler calls instead of one:
the first one for the set of "unrecoverable" checks, another one - for
set of "recoverable" checks. If all checks implemented by a handler have the
same recoverability setting, then the generated code will be the same.
llvm-svn: 225719
David Blaikie
Nick Lewycky
Hans Wennborg
Peter Collingbourne
Benjamin Kramer
David Majnemer
Alexey Bataev
Nico Weber
Chandler Carruth
Alexey Samsonov