The Go interpreter doesn't JIT or use LLVM, so this also
moves all the JIT related code from UserExpression to a new class LLVMUserExpression.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13073
Fix merge
llvm-svn: 251820
the corresponding TypeSystem. This makes sense because what kind of data there
is -- and how it can be looked up -- depends on the language.
Functionality that is common to all type systems is factored out into
PersistentExpressionState.
llvm-svn: 248934
There are still a bunch of dependencies on the plug-in, but this helps to
identify them.
There are also a few more bits we need to move (and abstract, for example the
ClangPersistentVariables).
llvm-svn: 248612
Before we had:
ClangFunction
ClangUtilityFunction
ClangUserExpression
and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression
base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds:
FunctionCaller
UtilityFunction
UserExpression
You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage.
The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches
the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it.
Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way,
I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper
that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types.
Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs.
The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller
to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a
FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions.
Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common
JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency
but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary.
llvm-svn: 247720
It is required because of the following edge case on arm:
bx <addr> Non-tail call in a no return function
[data-pool] Marked with $d mapping symbol
The return address of the function call will point to the data pool but
we have to treat it as code so the StackFrame can calculate the symbols
correctly.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12556
llvm-svn: 246958
stores information about a variable that different parts of LLDB use, from the
compiler-specific portion that only the expression parser cares about.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12602
llvm-svn: 246871
This API is currently a no-op (in the sense that it has the same behavior as the already existing GetName()), but is meant long-term to provide a best-for-visualization version of the name of a function
It is still not hooked up to the command line 'bt' command, nor to the 'gui' mode, but I do have ideas on how to make that work going forward
rdar://21203242
llvm-svn: 241482
lldb::addr_t SBFrame::GetCFA();
This gets the CFA (call frame address) of the frame so it allows us to take an address that is on the stack and figure out which thread it comes from.
Also modified the heap.py module to be able to find out which variable in a frame's stack frame contains an address. This way when ptr_refs finds a match on the stack, it get then report which variable contains the pointer.
llvm-svn: 238393
Summary:
sc.block->AppendVariables(...) returns 0 if there are no arguments or local
variables, but we still need to check for global variables.
Test Plan:
```
$ cat test.cpp
int i;
int main() {
}
$ lldb test -o 'b main' -o r
(lldb) script
>>> print lldb.frame.FindValue('i', lldb.eValueTypeVariableGlobal)
(int) i = 0 # as opposed to "No value"
```
Reviewers: jingham, ovyalov, vharron, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8464
llvm-svn: 232767
Reverting this commit led to other failures which I did not see at
first. This turned out to be an easy problem to fix, so I added
SBVariablesOptions.cpp to the CMakeLists.txt. In the future please
try to make sure new files are added to CMake.
llvm-svn: 229516
We talked about it internally - and came to the conclusion that it's time to have an options class
This commit adds an SBVariablesOptions class and goes through all the required dance
llvm-svn: 228975
A runtime support value is a ValueObject whose only purpose is to support some language runtime's operation, but it does not directly provide any user-visible benefit
As such, unless the user is working on the runtime support, it is mostly safe for them not to see such a value when debugging
It is a language runtime's job to check whether a ValueObject is a support value, and that - in conjunction with a target setting - is used by frame variable and target variable
SBFrame::GetVariables gets a new overload with yet another flag to dictate whether to return those support values to the caller - that which defaults to the setting's value
rdar://problem/15539930
llvm-svn: 228791
Add a callback that will allow an expression to be cancelled between the
expression evaluation stages (for the ClangUserExpressions.)
<rdar://problem/16790467>, <rdar://problem/16573440>
llvm-svn: 207944
This is a purely mechanical change explicitly casting any parameters for printf
style conversion. This cleans up the warnings emitted by gcc 4.8 on Linux.
llvm-svn: 205607
Fix a bug where calling SBFrame::FindValue() would cause a copy of all variables in the block to be inserted in the frame's variable list, regardless of whether those same variables were there or not - which means one could end up with a frame with lots of duplicate copies of the same variables
llvm-svn: 201614