The changes here are based on the corresponding diffs for allowing FMF on 'select':
D61917 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61917>
As discussed there, we want to have fast-math-flags be a property of an FP value
because the alternative (having them on things like fcmp) leads to logical
inconsistency such as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
The earlier patch for select made almost no practical difference because most
unoptimized conditional code begins life as a phi (based on what I see in clang).
Similarly, I don't expect this patch to do much on its own either because
SimplifyCFG promptly drops the flags when converting to select on a minimal
example like:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39535
But once we have this plumbing in place, we should be able to wire up the FMF
propagation and start solving cases like that.
The change to RecurrenceDescriptor::AddReductionVar() is required to prevent a
regression in a LoopVectorize test. We are intersecting the FMF of any
FPMathOperator there, so if a phi is not properly annotated, new math
instructions may not be either. Once we fix the propagation in SimplifyCFG, it
may be safe to remove that hack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67564
llvm-svn: 372878
The changes here are based on the corresponding diffs for allowing FMF on 'select':
D61917
As discussed there, we want to have fast-math-flags be a property of an FP value
because the alternative (having them on things like fcmp) leads to logical
inconsistency such as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
The earlier patch for select made almost no practical difference because most
unoptimized conditional code begins life as a phi (based on what I see in clang).
Similarly, I don't expect this patch to do much on its own either because
SimplifyCFG promptly drops the flags when converting to select on a minimal
example like:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39535
But once we have this plumbing in place, we should be able to wire up the FMF
propagation and start solving cases like that.
The change to RecurrenceDescriptor::AddReductionVar() is required to prevent a
regression in a LoopVectorize test. We are intersecting the FMF of any
FPMathOperator there, so if a phi is not properly annotated, new math
instructions may not be either. Once we fix the propagation in SimplifyCFG, it
may be safe to remove that hack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67564
llvm-svn: 372866
Summary:
Add function to AutoUpgrade to change the datalayout of old X86 datalayout strings.
This adds "-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64" to X86 datalayouts that are otherwise valid
and don't already contain it.
This also removes the compatibility changes in https://reviews.llvm.org/D66843.
Datalayout change in https://reviews.llvm.org/D64931.
Reviewers: rnk, echristo
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67631
llvm-svn: 372267
We cannot create null constants for certain types, e.g. VoidTy,
FunctionTy or LabelTy. getNullValue asserts if we pass in an
unsupported type. We should also check for opaque types, but I'm not
sure how.
This fixes https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=14795.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, jfb, vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65897
llvm-svn: 369557
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
Summary:
This is a tweak to r368311 and r368646 which auto upgrades the calls to
objc runtime functions to objc runtime intrinsics, in order to make sure
that the auto upgrader does not trigger with up-to-date bitcode.
It is possible for bitcode that is up-to-date to contain direct calls to
objc runtime function and those are not inserted by compiler as part of
ARC and they should not be upgraded. Now auto upgrader only triggers as
when the old style of ARC marker is used so it is guaranteed that it
won't trigger on update-to-date bitcode.
This also means it won't do this upgrade for bitcode from llvm-8 and
llvm-9, which preserves the behavior of those releases. Ideally they
should be upgraded as well but it is more important to make sure
AutoUpgrader will not trigger on up-to-date bitcode.
Reviewers: ahatanak, rjmccall, dexonsmith, pete
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Subscribers: hiraditya, jkorous, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66153
llvm-svn: 368730
the bitcode has the arm64 retainAutoreleasedReturnValue marker
The ARC middle-end passes stopped optimizing or transforming bitcode
that has been compiled with old compilers after we started emitting
calls to ARC runtime functions as intrinsic calls instead of normal
function calls in the front-end and made changes to teach the ARC
middle-end passes about those intrinsics (see r349534). This patch
converts calls to ARC runtime functions that are not intrinsic functions
to intrinsic function calls if the bitcode has the arm64
retainAutoreleasedReturnValue marker. Checking for the presence of the
marker is necessary to make sure we aren't changing ARC function calls
that were originally MRR message sends (see r349952).
rdar://problem/53280660
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65902
llvm-svn: 368311
Add "memtag" sanitizer that detects and mitigates stack memory issues
using armv8.5 Memory Tagging Extension.
It is similar in principle to HWASan, which is a software implementation
of the same idea, but there are enough differencies to warrant a new
sanitizer type IMHO. It is also expected to have very different
performance properties.
The new sanitizer does not have a runtime library (it may grow one
later, along with a "debugging" mode). Similar to SafeStack and
StackProtector, the instrumentation pass (in a follow up change) will be
inserted in all cases, but will only affect functions marked with the
new sanitize_memtag attribute.
Reviewers: pcc, hctim, vitalybuka, ostannard
Subscribers: srhines, mehdi_amini, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cryptoad, steven_wu, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64169
llvm-svn: 366123
This recommits r365750 (git commit 8b222ecf27)
Original message:
Currently invalid bitcode files can cause a crash, when OpNum exceeds
the number of elements in Record, like in the attached bitcode file.
The test case was generated by clusterfuzz: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=15698
Reviewers: t.p.northover, thegameg, jfb
Reviewed By: jfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64507
llvm-svn: 365750jkkkk
llvm-svn: 366018
At the moment, bitcode files with invalid forward reference can easily
cause the bitcode reader to run out of memory, by creating a forward
reference with a very high index.
We can use the size of the bitcode file as an upper bound, because a
valid bitcode file can never contain more records. This should be
sufficient to fail early in most cases. The only exception is large
files with invalid forward references close to the file size.
There are a couple of clusterfuzz runs that fail with out-of-memory
because of very high forward references and they should be fixed by this
patch.
A concrete example for this is D64507, which causes out-of-memory on
systems with low memory, like the hexagon upstream bots.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, thegameg, jfb, efriedma, hfinkel
Reviewed By: jfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64577
llvm-svn: 366017
Introduce and deduce "nosync" function attribute to indicate that a function
does not synchronize with another thread in a way that other thread might free memory.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, jfb, nhaehnle, arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, hfinkel, nhaenhle, mehdi_amini, steven_wu,
dexonsmith, arsenm, uenoku, hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62766
llvm-svn: 365830
Currently invalid bitcode files can cause a crash, when OpNum exceeds
the number of elements in Record, like in the attached bitcode file.
The test case was generated by clusterfuzz: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=15698
Reviewers: t.p.northover, thegameg, jfb
Reviewed By: jfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64507
llvm-svn: 365750
This patch adds a function attribute, nofree, to indicate that a function does
not, directly or indirectly, call a memory-deallocation function (e.g., free,
C++'s operator delete).
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49165
llvm-svn: 365336
Reintroduces the scalable vector IR type from D32530, after it was reverted
a couple of times due to increasing chromium LTO build times. This latest
incarnation removes the walk over aggregate types from the verifier entirely,
in favor of rejecting scalable vectors in the isValidElementType methods in
ArrayType and StructType. This removes the 70% degradation observed with
the second repro tarball from PR42210.
Reviewers: thakis, hans, rengolin, sdesmalen
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64079
llvm-svn: 365203
It's possible that some function can load and store the same
variable using the same constant expression:
store %Derived* @foo, %Derived** bitcast (%Base** @bar to %Derived**)
%42 = load %Derived*, %Derived** bitcast (%Base** @bar to %Derived**)
The bitcast expression was mistakenly cached while processing loads,
and never examined later when processing store. This caused @bar to
be mistakenly treated as read-only variable. See load-store-caching.ll.
llvm-svn: 365188
This reverts r365040 (git commit 5cacb91475)
Speculatively reverting, since this appears to have broken check-lld on
Linux. Partial analysis in https://crbug.com/981168.
llvm-svn: 365097
This moves Bitcode/Bitstream*, Bitcode/BitCodes.h to Bitstream/.
This is needed to avoid a circular dependency when using the bitstream
code for parsing optimization remarks.
Since Bitcode uses Core for the IR part:
libLLVMRemarks -> Bitcode -> Core
and Core uses libLLVMRemarks to generate remarks (see
IR/RemarkStreamer.cpp):
Core -> libLLVMRemarks
we need to separate the Bitstream and Bitcode part.
For clang-doc, it seems that it doesn't need the whole bitcode layer, so
I updated the CMake to only use the bitstream part.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63899
llvm-svn: 365091
Guillaume Chatelet
Michael Berg
Cameron McInally
Sanjay Patel
Amy Huang
Florian Hahn
Jonas Devlieghere
Steven Wu
Akira Hatanaka
Evgeniy Stepanov
Stefan Stipanovic
Brian Homerding
Eugene Leviant
Graham Hunter
Simon Pilgrim
Reid Kleckner
Francis Visoiu Mistrih