Support for writing this module code was removed in r73220, which was well
before the LLVM 3.0 release, so we do not need to be able to understand it
for backwards compatibility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31563
llvm-svn: 299370
-ffp-contract=fast does not currently work with LTO because it's passed as a
TargetOption to the backend rather than in the IR. This adds it to
FastMathFlags.
This is toward fixing PR25721
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31164
llvm-svn: 298939
Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.
Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.
It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.
Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102
llvm-svn: 298393
Summary:
In SamplePGO, if the profile is collected from non-LTO binary, and used to drive ThinLTO, the indirect call promotion may fail because ThinLTO adjusts local function names to avoid conflicts. There are two places of where the mismatch can happen:
1. thin-link prepends SourceFileName to front of FuncName to build the GUID (GlobalValue::getGlobalIdentifier). Unlike instrumentation FDO, SamplePGO does not use the PGOFuncName scheme and therefore the indirect call target profile data contains a hash of the OriginalName.
2. backend compiler promotes some local functions to global and appends .llvm.{$ModuleHash} to the end of the FuncName to derive PromotedFunctionName
This patch tries at the best effort to find the GUID from the original local function name (in profile), and use that in ICP promotion, and in SamplePGO matching that happens in the backend after importing/inlining:
1. in thin-link, it builds the map from OriginalName to GUID so that when thin-link reads in indirect call target profile (represented by OriginalName), it knows which GUID to import.
2. in backend compiler, if sample profile reader cannot find a profile match for PromotedFunctionName, it will try to find if there is a match for OriginalFunctionName.
3. in backend compiler, we build symbol table entry for OriginalFunctionName and pointer to the same symbol of PromotedFunctionName, so that ICP can find the correct target to promote.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30754
llvm-svn: 297757
The summary information includes all uses of llvm.type.test and
llvm.type.checked.load intrinsics that can be used to devirtualize calls,
including any constant arguments for virtual constant propagation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29734
llvm-svn: 294795
This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D29349. It turns out
that NeedUpgradeToDIGlobalVariableExpression is always necessary when
we encountered a version==0 record because it may always be referenced
via a list of globals in a DICompileUnit. My tests weren't good enough
to catch this though. To trigger this case, we need much older bitcode
produced by LLVM around version 3.7.
<rdar://problem/30404262>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29693
llvm-svn: 294488
The bitcode upgrade for DIGlobalVariable unconditionally wrapped
DIGlobalVariables in a DIGlobalVariableExpression. When a
DIGlobalVariable is referenced by a DIImportedEntity, however, this is
wrong. This patch fixes the bitcode upgrade by deferring the creation
of DIGlobalVariableExpressions until we know the context of the
DIGlobalVariable.
<rdar://problem/30134279>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29349
llvm-svn: 294318
This reverts commit r293970.
After more discussion, this belongs to the linker side and
there is no added value to do it at this level.
llvm-svn: 293993
When a symbol is not exported outside of the
DSO, it is can be hidden. Usually we try to internalize
as much as possible, but it is not always possible, for
instance a symbol can be referenced outside of the LTO
unit, or there can be cross-module reference in ThinLTO.
This is a recommit of r293912 after fixing build failures,
and a recommit of r293918 after fixing LLD tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28978
llvm-svn: 293970
When a symbol is not exported outside of the
DSO, it is can be hidden. Usually we try to internalize
as much as possible, but it is not always possible, for
instance a symbol can be referenced outside of the LTO
unit, or there can be cross-module reference in ThinLTO.
This is a recommit of r293912 after fixing build failures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28978
llvm-svn: 293918
When a symbol is not exported outside of the
DSO, it is can be hidden. Usually we try to internalize
as much as possible, but it is not always possible, for
instance a symbol can be referenced outside of the LTO
unit, or there can be cross-module reference in ThinLTO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28978
llvm-svn: 293912
Summary:
MetadataLoader::MetadataLoaderImpl::parseOneMetadata uses
the following construct in a number of places:
```
MetadataList.assignValue(<...>, NextMetadataNo++);
```
There, NextMetadataNo gets incremented, and since the order
of arguments evaluation is not specified, that can happen
before or after other arguments are evaluated.
In a few cases the other arguments indirectly use NextMetadataNo.
For instance, it's
```
MetadataList.assignValue(
GET_OR_DISTINCT(DIModule,
(Context, getMDOrNull(Record[1]),
getMDString(Record[2]), getMDString(Record[3]),
getMDString(Record[4]), getMDString(Record[5]))),
NextMetadataNo++);
```
getMDOrNull calls getMD that uses NextMetadataNo:
```
MetadataList.getMetadataFwdRef(NextMetadataNo);
```
Therefore, the order of evaluation becomes important. That caused
a very subtle LLD crash that only happens if compiled with GCC or
if LLD is built with LTO. In the case if LLD is compiled with Clang
and regular linking mode, everything worked as intended.
This change extracts incrementing of NextMetadataNo outside of
the arguments list to guarantee the correct order of evaluation.
For the record, this has taken 3 days to track to the origin. It all
started with a ThinLTO bot in Chrome not being able to link a target
if debug info is enabled.
Reviewers: pcc, mehdi_amini
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: aprantl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29204
llvm-svn: 293291
CFI is using intrinsics that takes MDString as arguments, and this
was broken during lazy-loading of metadata.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28916
llvm-svn: 292641
Summary:
Without this, we're stressing the RAUW of unique nodes,
which is a costly operation. This is intended to limit
the number of RAUW, and is very effective on the total
link-time of opt with ThinLTO, before:
real 4m4.587s user 15m3.401s sys 0m23.616s
after:
real 3m25.261s user 12m22.132s sys 0m24.152s
Reviewers: tejohnson, pcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28751
llvm-svn: 292420
The change in r291362 was too agressive. We still need to flush at the
end of the block because function local metadata can introduce fwd
ref as well.
(Bootstrap with ThinLTO was broken)
llvm-svn: 291379
Peter Collingbourne
Simon Pilgrim
Adam Nemet
Reid Kleckner
Dehao Chen
Konstantin Zhuravlyov
Benjamin Kramer
Adrian Prantl
Mehdi Amini
Ivan Krasin