All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this
class can now safely be lowered into Utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559
llvm-svn: 296909
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
for TestNamespaceLookup.py; didn't see anything obviously wrong so I'll
need to look at this more closely before re-committing. (passed OK on
macOS ;)
llvm-svn: 273531
There's uses of "macosx" that will be more tricky to
change, like in triples (e.g. "x86_64-apple-macosx10.11") -
for now I'm just updating source comments and strings printed
for humans.
llvm-svn: 273524
Summary:
- Reason of both bugs:
1. For the very first frame, Unwinder doesn't check the validity
of Full UnwindPlan before creating StackFrame from it:
When 'process launch' command is run after setting a breakpoint
in inferior, the Unwinder runs and saves only Frame 0 (the frame
in which breakpoint was set) in thread's StackFrameList i.e.
m_curr_frames_sp. However, it doesn't check the validity of the
Full UnwindPlan for this frame by unwinding 2 more frames further.
2. Unwinder doesn't update the CFA value of Cursor when Full UnwindPlan
fails and FallBack UnwindPlan succeeds in providing valid CFA values
for frames:
Sometimes during unwinding of stack frames, the Full UnwindPlan
inside the RegisterContextLLDB object may fail to provide valid
CFA values for these frames. Then the Fallback UnwindPlan is used
to unwind the frames.
If the Fallback UnwindPlan succeeds, then it provides a valid new
CFA value. The RegisterContextLLDB::m_cfa field of Cursor object
is updated during the Fallback UnwindPlan execution. However,
UnwindLLDB misses the implementation to update the 'cfa' field
of this Cursor with this valid new CFA value.
- This patch fixes both these issues.
- Remove XFAIL in test files corresponding to these 2 Bugs
Change-Id: I932ea407545ceee2d628f946ecc61a4806d4cc86
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Aggarwal <abhishek.a.aggarwal@intel.com>
Reviewers: jingham, lldb-commits, jasonmolenda
Subscribers: lldb-commits, ovyalov, tberghammer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14226
llvm-svn: 253026
Previously we accepted a frame as correct result if the PC pointed
into an executable section of code. The isse with that approac is
that if we calculated PC correctly but messed up the value of CFA
then unwinding from the next fram will most likely fail.
With this change I modify the logic with keeping the requirement
for PC to point to an executable section and also check that we can
continue the unwind from the frame we calculated. If continuing from
the frame calculated with the primary unwind plan isn't working then
fall back to the fallback plan with the hope for a better frame (if
the fallback plan won't help then we acceot the frame from the
primary plan).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10932
llvm-svn: 241434
This continues the effort to reduce header footprint and improve
build speed by removing clang and other unnecessary headers
from Target.h. In one case, some headers were included solely
for the purpose of declaring a nested class in Target, which was
not needed by anybody outside the class. In this case the
definition and implementation of the nested class were isolated
in the .cpp file so the header could be removed.
llvm-svn: 231107
a register value that is live in the stack frame 0 register context.
Fixes a problem where retrieving a register value on stack frame #n
would involved O(n!) stack frame checks. This could be very slow on
a deep stack when retrieving register values that had not been
modified/saved by any of the stack frames. Not common, but annoying
when it was hit.
<rdar://problem/19010211>
llvm-svn: 223843
UnwindLLDB::AddOneMoreFrame to try the fallback unwind plan on
that same stack frame before it tries the fallback unwind plan
on the "next" or callee frame.
In RegisterContextLLDB::TryFallbackUnwindPlan, when we're
trying the fallback unwind plan to see if it is valid, make
sure we change all of the object ivars that might be used in
the process of fetching the CFA & caller's saved pc value
and restore those if we decide not to use the fallback
unwindplan.
<rdar://problem/19035079>
llvm-svn: 222601
RegisterContextLLDB. I have core files of half a dozen tricky
unwind situations on x86/arm and they're all working pretty much
correctly at this point, but we'll need to keep an eye out for
unwinder regressions for a little while; it's tricky to get these
heuristics completely correct in all unwind situations.
<rdar://problem/18937193>
llvm-svn: 221866
let's let lldb try the arch default unwind every time but not destructively --
it doesn't permanently replace the main unwind method for that function from
now on.
This fix is for <rdar://problem/18683658>.
I tested it against Ryan Brown's go program test case and also a
collection of core files of tricky unwind scenarios
<rdar://problem/15664282> <rdar://problem/15835846>
<rdar://problem/15982682> <rdar://problem/16099440>
<rdar://problem/17364005> <rdar://problem/18556719>
that I've fixed over the last 6-9 months.
llvm-svn: 221238
is "invalid" -- it is past the end of the stack trace. Add a new
method IsCompletedStackWalk() so we can tell if an invalid stack
frame is from a complete backtrace or if it might be worth re-trying
the last unwind with a different method.
This fixes the unwinder problems Ryan Brown was having with go
programs. The unwinder can (under the right circumstances) still
destructively replace unwind plans permanently - I'll work on
that in a different patch.
<rdar://problem/18683658>
llvm-svn: 221229
This is a mechanical change addressing the various sign comparison warnings that
are identified by both clang and gcc. This helps cleanup some of the warning
spew that occurs during builds.
llvm-svn: 205390
class. If we try to unwind a stack frame to find a caller stack
frame, and we fail to get a valid-looking frame, AND if the UnwindPlan
we used is an assembly-inspection based UnwindPlan, then we should
throw away the assembly-inspection UnwindPlan and try unwinding with
the architectural default UnwindPlan.
This code path won't be taken if eh_frame unwind instructions are available -
lldb will always prefer those once it's off the zeroth frame.
The problem I'm trying to fix here is the class of unwind failures that
happen when we have hand-written assembly on the stack, with no eh_frame,
and lldb's assembly parser fails to understand the assembly. People usually
write their hand-written assembly to follow the frame-pointer-preserving
conventions of the platform so the architectural default UnwindPlan will
often work. We won't have the spill location for most of the non-volatile
registers if we fall back to this, but it's better than stopping the unwind
prematurely.
This is a bit of a tricky change that I believe is correct, but if we get
unwinds that go of into the weeds / unwind bogus frames at the end of the
stack, I'll need to revisit it.
<rdar://problem/16099440>
llvm-svn: 201839
specify a list of functions which should be treated as trap handlers.
This will be primarily useful to people working in non-user-level
process debugging - kernels and other standalone environments.
For most people, the trap handler functions provided by the Platform
plugin will be sufficient.
<rdar://problem/15835846>, <rdar://problem/15982682>
llvm-svn: 201386
aka asynchronous signal handlers, which subclasses should fill
in as appropriate. For most Unix user process environments,
the one entry in this list is _sigtramp. For bare-board and
kernel environments, there will be different sets of trap
handlers.
The unwinder needs to know when a frame is a trap handler
because the rules it enforces for the frame "above" the
trap handler is different from most middle-of-the-stack frames.
<rdar://problem/15835846>
llvm-svn: 201300
its stack frame is a constructed, fake thing that may not conform
correctly to these rules. This fixes a problem where lldb couldn't
backtrace past an asynchronous signal handler (_sigtramp) frame on
a stack on Mac OS X.
<rdar://problem/15035673>
llvm-svn: 198450
The original code was not completely correct, but a form of
this check is necessary to avoid an infinite recursion on
some unwind cases where a function unwinds to itself with the
same CFA. Ashok thought the recursion would be caught in
RegisterContextLLDB but this one isn't - we still need it here.
<rdar://problem/15664282>
llvm-svn: 197761
pure virtual base class and made StackFrame a subclass of that. As
I started to build on top of that arrangement today, I found that it
wasn't working out like I intended. Instead I'll try sticking with
the single StackFrame class -- there's too much code duplication to
make a more complicated class hierarchy sensible I think.
llvm-svn: 193983
defines a protocol that all subclasses will implement. StackFrame
is currently the only subclass and the methods that Frame vends are
nearly identical to StackFrame's old methods.
Update all callers to use Frame*/Frame& instead of pointers to
StackFrames.
This is almost entirely a mechanical change that touches a lot of
the code base so I'm committing it alone. No new functionality is
added with this patch, no new subclasses of Frame exist yet.
I'll probably need to tweak some of the separation, possibly moving
some of StackFrame's methods up in to Frame, but this is a good
starting point.
<rdar://problem/15314068>
llvm-svn: 193907
- Removes the block in UnwindLLDB::AddOneMoreFrame that tests for a bad stack setup,
since it is neither correct (tests the FP GPR), complete (doesn't consider multi-frame
cycles), nor reachable (the construction of RegisterContextLLDB will fail in the case
where either of the two (why just two?) previous frames have the same canonical frame
address as the frame that we propose adding to the stack).
llvm-svn: 191430
the link register save location being in the link register - in which case we
should iterate down the stack, not recursively try to find the lr in the current
frame over and over.
<rdar://problem/13932954>
llvm-svn: 183282
thread before UnwindLLDB::AddOneMoreFrame calls it quits. We have
a couple of reports of unending backtraces in the field and we
haven't been able to collect any information about what kind of
backtrace is causing this. We've found on Mac OS X that it's tricky
to get more than around 200k stack frames before a process exceeds
its stack space so we're starting with a hard limit of 300,000 frames.
<rdar://problem/13383069>
llvm-svn: 180995
LLDB is crashing when logging is enabled from lldb-perf-clang. This has to do with the global destructor chain as the process and its threads are being torn down.
All logging channels now make one and only one instance that is kept in a global pointer which is never freed. This guarantees that logging can correctly continue as the process tears itself down.
llvm-svn: 178191
Zachary Turner
Pavel Labath
Kate Stone
Jason Molenda
Abhishek Aggarwal
Tamas Berghammer
Saleem Abdulrasool
Ashok Thirumurthi
Greg Clayton