All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this
class can now safely be lowered into Utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559
llvm-svn: 296909
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.
ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString
The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427
llvm-svn: 293941
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
Previously we eliminated the randomized scheme for finding memory when the
underlying process cannot allocate memory, and replaced it with an algorithm
that starts the allocations at 00x.
This was more determinstic, but runs into problems on embedded targets where the
pages near 0x0 are in fact interesting memory. To deal with those cases, this
patch does two things:
- It makes the default fallback be an address that is less likely than 0x0 to
contain interesting information.
- Before falling back to this, it adds an algorithm that consults the
GetMemoryRegionInfo() API to see if it can find an unmapped area.
This should eliminate the randomness (and unpredictable memory accesseas) of the
previous scheme while making expressions more likely to return correct results.
<rdar://problem/25545573>
llvm-svn: 272301
For Hexagon we want to be able to call functions during debugging, however currently lldb only supports this when there is JIT support.
Although emulation using IR interpretation is an alternative, it is currently limited in that it can't make function calls.
In this patch we have extended the IR interpreter so that it can execute a function call on the target using register manipulation.
To do this we need to handle the Call IR instruction, passing arguments to a new thread plan and collecting any return values to pass back into the IR interpreter.
The new thread plan is needed to call an alternative ABI interface of "ABI::PerpareTrivialCall()", allowing more detailed information about arguments and return values.
Reviewers: jingham, spyffe
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits, ted, ADodds, deepak2427
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9404
llvm-svn: 242137
The current strategy for host allocation is to choose a random
address and attempt to allocate there, eventually failing if the
allocation cannot be satisfied.
The C standard only guarantees that RAND_MAX >= 32767, so for
platforms that use a very small RAND_MAX allocations will fail
with very high probability. On such platforms (Windows is one),
you can reproduce this trivially by running lldb, typing "expr (3)"
and then hitting enter you see a failure. Failures generally
happen with a frequency of about 1 failure every 5 evaluations.
There is no good reason that allocations need to look like "real"
pointers, so this patch changes the allocation scheme to simply
jump straight to the end and grab a free chunk of memory.
Reviewed By: Sean Callanan
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4300
llvm-svn: 212630
This change brings in lldb-gdbserver (llgs) specifically for Linux x86_64.
(More architectures coming soon).
Not every debugserver option is covered yet. Currently
the lldb-gdbserver command line can start unattached,
start attached to a pid (process-name attach not supported yet),
or accept lldb attaching and launching a process or connecting
by process id.
The history of this large change can be found here:
https://github.com/tfiala/lldb/tree/dev-tfiala-native-protocol-linux-x86_64
Until mid/late April, I was not sharing the work and continued
to rebase it off of head (developed via id tfiala@google.com). I switched over to
user todd.fiala@gmail.com in the middle, and once I went to github, I did
merges rather than rebasing so I could share with others.
llvm-svn: 212069
Previously, only the starting locations of the candidate interval
and the existing interval were compared. To correctly detect
range intersections, it is necessary to compare the entire range
of both intervals against each other.
Reviewed by: scallanan
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4286
llvm-svn: 211726
(lldb) b puts
(lldb) expr -g -i0 -- (int)puts("hello")
First we will stop at the entry point of the expression before it runs, then we can step over a few times and hit the breakpoint in "puts", then we can continue and finishing stepping and fininsh the expression.
Main features:
- New ObjectFileJIT class that can be easily created for JIT functions
- debug info can now be enabled when parsing expressions
- source for any function that is run throught the JIT is now saved in LLDB process specific temp directory and cleaned up on exit
- "expr -g --" allows you to single step through your expression function with source code
<rdar://problem/16382881>
llvm-svn: 204682
bother checking if a region is safe to use. In
cases where regions need to be synthesized rather
than properly allocated, the memory reads required
to determine whether the area is used are
- insufficient, because intermediate locations
could be in use, and
- unsafe, because on some platforms reading from
memory can trigger events.
All this only makes a difference on platforms
where memory allocation in the target is impossible.
Behavior on platforms where it is possible should
stay the same.
<rdar://problem/14023970>
llvm-svn: 185046
live as long as they needed to. This led to
equality tests involving persistent variables
often failing or succeeding when they had no
business doing so.
To do this, I introduced the ability for a
memory allocation to "leak" - that is, to
persist in the process beyond the lifetime of
the expression. Hand-declared persistent
variables do this now.
<rdar://problem/13956311>
llvm-svn: 182528
Zachary Turner
Pavel Labath
Kate Stone
Sean Callanan
Greg Clayton
Rafael Espindola
Jim Ingham
Ewan Crawford
Sylvestre Ledru
Todd Fiala
Virgile Bello
Michael Sartain
Matt Kopec