This adjusts header file includes for headers and source files
in Core. In doing so, one dependency cycle is eliminated
because all the includes from Core to that project were dead
includes anyway. In places where some files in other projects
were only compiling due to a transitive include from another
header, fixups have been made so that those files also include
the header they need. Tested on Windows and Linux, and plan
to address failures on OSX and FreeBSD after watching the
bots.
llvm-svn: 299714
All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this
class can now safely be lowered into Utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559
llvm-svn: 296909
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
"Allow LanguageRuntimes to return an error if they fail in the course of dynamic type discovery
This is not meant to report that a value doesn't have a dynamic type - it is only meant as a mechanism to propagate actual type discovery issues (e.g. malformed type metadata for languages that have such a notion)
This information is used by ValueObjectDynamic to set its own m_error, which is a fairly sharp and heavyweight tool to begin with
For the time being, this is an architectural improvement but a practical no-op as no existing runtimes are actually setting errors"
I need to think about what I want to do in this space more carefully - this attempt might be too heavy of a hammer for the nail I am trying to fix, and I don't want to leave it in while I ponder
llvm-svn: 268686
This is not meant to report that a value doesn't have a dynamic type - it is only meant as a mechanism to propagate actual type discovery issues (e.g. malformed type metadata for languages that have such a notion)
This information is used by ValueObjectDynamic to set its own m_error, which is a fairly sharp and heavyweight tool to begin with
For the time being, this is an architectural improvement but a practical no-op as no existing runtimes are actually setting errors
llvm-svn: 268591
In this way, when a language needs to tell itself things that are not bound to a type but to a value (imagine a base-class relation, this is not about the type, but about the ValueObject), it can do so in a clean and general fashion
The interpretation of the values of the flags is, of course, up to the language that owns the value (the value object's runtime language, that is)
llvm-svn: 252503
Summary:
Along with this, support for an optional argument to the "num_children"
method of a Python synthetic child provider has also been added. These have
been added with the following use case in mind:
Synthetic child providers currently have a method "has_children" and
"num_children". While the former is good enough to know if there are
children, it does not give any insight into how many children there are.
Though the latter serves this purpose, calculating the number for children
of a data structure could be an O(N) operation if the data structure has N
children. The new method added in this change provide a middle ground.
One can call GetNumChildren(K) to know if a child exists at an index K
which can be as large as the callers tolerance can be. If the caller wants
to know about children beyond K, it can make an other call with 2K. If the
synthetic child provider maintains state about it counting till K
previosly, then the next call is only an O(K) operation. Infact, all
calls made progressively with steps of K will be O(K) operations.
Reviewers: vharron, clayborg, granata.enrico
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13778
llvm-svn: 250930
This is meant to cover cases such as the obvious
Base *base = new Derived();
where GetDynamicTypeAndAddress(base) would return the type "Derived", not "Derived *"
llvm-svn: 248315
For C++ and ObjC, dynamic values are always (at least somewhat) pointer-like in nature, so a ValueType of scalar is actually good enough that it could originally be hardcoded as the right choice
Other languages, might have broader notions of things that are dynamic (e.g. a language where a value type can be dynamic). In those cases, it might actually be the case that a dynamic value is a pointer-to the data, or even a host address if dynamic expression results entirely in host space are being talked about
This patch enables the language runtime to make that decision, and makes ValueObjectDynamicValue comply with it
llvm-svn: 247957
This cleans up type systems to be more pluggable. Prior to this we had issues:
- Module, SymbolFile, and many others has "ClangASTContext &GetClangASTContext()" functions. All have been switched over to use "TypeSystem *GetTypeSystemForLanguage()"
- Cleaned up any places that were using the GetClangASTContext() functions to use TypeSystem
- Cleaned up Module so that it no longer has dedicated type system member variables:
lldb::ClangASTContextUP m_ast; ///< The Clang AST context for this module.
lldb::GoASTContextUP m_go_ast; ///< The Go AST context for this module.
Now we have a type system map:
typedef std::map<lldb::LanguageType, lldb::TypeSystemSP> TypeSystemMap;
TypeSystemMap m_type_system_map; ///< A map of any type systems associated with this module
- Many places in code were using ClangASTContext static functions to place with CompilerType objects and add modifiers (const, volatile, restrict) and to make typedefs, L and R value references and more. These have been made into CompilerType functions that are abstract:
class CompilerType
{
...
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
// Return a new CompilerType that is a L value reference to this type if
// this type is valid and the type system supports L value references,
// else return an invalid type.
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
CompilerType
GetLValueReferenceType () const;
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
// Return a new CompilerType that is a R value reference to this type if
// this type is valid and the type system supports R value references,
// else return an invalid type.
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
CompilerType
GetRValueReferenceType () const;
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
// Return a new CompilerType adds a const modifier to this type if
// this type is valid and the type system supports const modifiers,
// else return an invalid type.
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
CompilerType
AddConstModifier () const;
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
// Return a new CompilerType adds a volatile modifier to this type if
// this type is valid and the type system supports volatile modifiers,
// else return an invalid type.
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
CompilerType
AddVolatileModifier () const;
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
// Return a new CompilerType adds a restrict modifier to this type if
// this type is valid and the type system supports restrict modifiers,
// else return an invalid type.
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
CompilerType
AddRestrictModifier () const;
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
// Create a typedef to this type using "name" as the name of the typedef
// this type is valid and the type system supports typedefs, else return
// an invalid type.
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
CompilerType
CreateTypedef (const char *name, const CompilerDeclContext &decl_ctx) const;
};
Other changes include:
- Removed "CompilerType TypeSystem::GetIntTypeFromBitSize(...)" and CompilerType TypeSystem::GetFloatTypeFromBitSize(...) and replaced it with "CompilerType TypeSystem::GetBuiltinTypeForEncodingAndBitSize(lldb::Encoding encoding, size_t bit_size);"
- Fixed code in Type.h to not request the full type for a type for no good reason, just request the forward type and let the type expand as needed
llvm-svn: 247953
Create a new "lldb_private::CompilerDeclContext" class that will replace all direct uses of "clang::DeclContext" when used in compiler agnostic code, yet still allow for conversion to clang::DeclContext subclasses by clang specific code. This completes the abstraction of type parsing by removing all "clang::" references from the SymbolFileDWARF. The new "lldb_private::CompilerDeclContext" class abstracts decl contexts found in compiler type systems so they can be used in internal API calls. The TypeSystem is required to support CompilerDeclContexts with new pure virtual functions that start with "DeclContext" in the member function names. Converted all code that used lldb_private::ClangNamespaceDecl over to use the new CompilerDeclContext class and removed the ClangNamespaceDecl.cpp and ClangNamespaceDecl.h files.
Removed direct use of clang APIs from SBType and now use the abstract type systems to correctly explore types.
Bulk renames for things that used to return a ClangASTType which is now CompilerType:
"Type::GetClangFullType()" to "Type::GetFullCompilerType()"
"Type::GetClangLayoutType()" to "Type::GetLayoutCompilerType()"
"Type::GetClangForwardType()" to "Type::GetForwardCompilerType()"
"Value::GetClangType()" to "Value::GetCompilerType()"
"Value::SetClangType (const CompilerType &)" to "Value::SetCompilerType (const CompilerType &)"
"ValueObject::GetClangType ()" to "ValueObject::GetCompilerType()"
many more renames that are similar.
llvm-svn: 245905
This is more preparation for multiple different kinds of types from different compilers (clang, Pascal, Go, RenderScript, Swift, etc).
llvm-svn: 244689
This is the work done by Ryan Brown from http://reviews.llvm.org/D8712 that makes a TypeSystem class and abstracts types to be able to use a type system.
All tests pass on MacOSX and passed on linux the last time this was submitted.
llvm-svn: 244679
And since enough of these are doing the right thing, add a test case to verify we are doing the right thing with freeze drying ObjC object types
Fixes rdar://18092770
llvm-svn: 227282
the runtime rather than trying to fix it up,
because now those types have ivars regardless of
whether they come from "frame variable" or from
expressions.
Patch by Enrico Granata.
llvm-svn: 220982
The way to do this is to write a synthetic child provider for your type, and have it vend the (optional) get_value function.
If get_value is defined, and it returns a valid SBValue, that SBValue's value (as in lldb_private::Value) will be used as the synthetic ValueObject's Value
The rationale for doing things this way is twofold:
- there are many possible ways to define a "value" (SBData, a Python number, ...) but SBValue seems general enough as a thing that stores a "value", so we just trade values that way and that keeps our currency trivial
- we could introduce a new level of layering (ValueObjectSyntheticValue), a new kind of formatter (synthetic value producer), but that would complicate the model (can I have a dynamic with no synthetic children but synthetic value? synthetic value with synthetic children but no dynamic?), and I really couldn't see much benefit to be reaped from this added complexity in the matrix
On the other hand, just defining a synthetic child provider with a get_value but returning no actual children is easy enough that it's not a significant road-block to adoption of this feature
Comes with a test case
llvm-svn: 219330
Rationale:
Pretty simply, the idea is that sometimes type names are way too long and contain way too many details for the average developer to care about. For instance, a plain ol' vector of int might be shown as
std::__1::vector<int, std::__1::allocator<....
rather than the much simpler std::vector<int> form, which is what most developers would actually type in their code
Proposed solution:
Introduce a notion of "display name" and a corresponding API GetDisplayTypeName() to return such a crafted for visual representation type name
Obviously, the display name and the fully qualified (or "true") name are not necessarily the same - that's the whole point
LLDB could choose to pick the "display name" as its one true notion of a type name, and if somebody really needs the fully qualified version of it, let them deal with the problem
Or, LLDB could rename what it currently calls the "type name" to be the "display name", and add new APIs for the fully qualified name, making the display name the default choice
The choice that I am making here is that the type name will keep meaning the same, and people who want a type name suited for display will explicitly ask for one
It is the less risky/disruptive choice - and it should eventually make it fairly obvious when someone is asking for the wrong type
Caveats:
- for now, GetDisplayTypeName() == GetTypeName(), there is no logic to produce customized display type names yet.
- while the fully-qualified type name is still the main key to the kingdom of data formatters, if we start showing custom names to people, those should match formatters
llvm-svn: 209072
Zachary Turner
Kate Stone
Enrico Granata
Siva Chandra
Greg Clayton
Pavel Labath
Sean Callanan