This adjusts header file includes for headers and source files
in Core. In doing so, one dependency cycle is eliminated
because all the includes from Core to that project were dead
includes anyway. In places where some files in other projects
were only compiling due to a transitive include from another
header, fixups have been made so that those files also include
the header they need. Tested on Windows and Linux, and plan
to address failures on OSX and FreeBSD after watching the
bots.
llvm-svn: 299714
Summary:
Calling ValueObject::SetName from a sythetic child provider would change
the underying value object used for the non-synthetic child as well what
is clearly unintentional.
Reviewers: jingham, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31371
llvm-svn: 299259
Summary:
After this change a sythetic child provider can generate a special child
named "$$dereference$$" what if present is used when "operator*" or
"operator->" used on a ValueObject. The goal of the change is to make
expressions like "up->foo" work inside the "frame variable" command.
Reviewers: labath, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31368
llvm-svn: 299251
All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this
class can now safely be lowered into Utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559
llvm-svn: 296909
With this patch, the only dependency left is from Utility
to Host. After this is broken, Utility will finally be
standalone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29909
llvm-svn: 295088
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.
ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString
The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427
llvm-svn: 293941
This concludes the changes I originally tried to make and then
had to back out. This way if anything is still broken, it
should be easier to bisect it back to a more specific changeset.
llvm-svn: 287367
The scanning algorithm had a few little subtleties that I
overlooked, but this patch should fix everything.
I still haven't changed the function to take a StringRef since
that has some trickle down effect and is mostly mechanical,
I just wanted to get the tricky part as isolated as possible.
llvm-svn: 287354
This argument was only used in one place in the codebase, and
it was in a non-critical log statement and can be easily
substituted for an equally meaningful field instead. The
payoff of computing this value is not worth the added
complexity.
llvm-svn: 287315
Apparently these two enormous functions were dead. Which is
good, since one was largely a copy of another function with
only a few minor tweaks.
llvm-svn: 287308
Originally I converted this entire function and all dependents
to use StringRef, but there were some test failures that
were tricky to track down, as this is a complicated function.
So I'm starting over, this time in smaller increments.
llvm-svn: 287307
This is a large API change that removes the two functions from
StreamString that return a std::string& and a const std::string&,
and instead provide one function which returns a StringRef.
Direct access to the underlying buffer violates the concept of
a "stream" which is intended to provide forward only access,
and makes porting to llvm::raw_ostream more difficult in the
future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26698
llvm-svn: 287152
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
"frame variable" and "target variable" are trying to emulate the expression parser when doing things like:
(lldb) frame variable &my_struct.my_bitfield
And since the expression parser doesn't allow this, we shouldn't allow "frame variable" or "target variable" to succeed.
<rdar://problem/27208607>
llvm-svn: 274703
Currently, the DataExtractor::GetMaxU64Bitfield and GetMaxS64Bitfield
routines assume the incoming "bitfield_bit_offset" parameter uses
little-endian bit numbering, i.e. a bitfield_bit_offset 0 refers to
a bitfield whose least-significant bit coincides with the least-
significant bit of the surrounding integer.
On many big-endian systems, however, the big-endian bit numbering
is used for bit fields. Here, a bitfield_bit_offset 0 refers to
a bitfield whose most-significant bit conincides with the most-
significant bit of the surrounding integer.
Now, in principle LLDB could arbitrarily choose which semantics of
bitfield_bit_offset to use. However, there are two problems with
the current approach:
- When parsing DWARF, LLDB decodes bit offsets in little-endian
bit numbering on LE systems, but in big-endian bit numbering
on BE systems. Passing those offsets later on into the
DataExtractor routines gives incorrect results on BE.
- In the interim, LLDB's type layer combines byte and bit offsets
into a single number. I.e. instead of recording bitfields by
specifying the byte offset and byte size of the surrounding
integer *plus* the bit offset of the bit field within that field,
it simply records a single bit offset number.
Now, note that converting from byte offset + bit offset to a
single offset value and back is well-defined if we either use
little-endian byte order *and* little-endian bit numbering,
or use big-endian byte order *and* big-endian bit numbering.
Any other combination will yield incorrect results.
Therefore, the simplest approach would seem to be to always use
the bit numbering that matches the system byte order. This makes
storing a single bit offset valid, and makes the existing DWARF
code correct. The only place to fix is to teach DataExtractor
to use big-endian bit numbering on big endian systems.
However, there is only additional caveat: we also get bit offsets
from LLDB synthetic bitfields. While the exact semantics of those
doesn't seem to be well-defined, from test cases it appears that
the intent was for the user-provided synthetic bitfield offset to
always use little-endian bit numbering. Therefore, on a big-endian
system we now have to convert those to big-endian bit numbering
to remain consistent.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18982
llvm-svn: 266312
When the parent of an expression is anonymous, skip adding '.' or '->' before the expression name.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18005
llvm-svn: 263166
Zachary Turner
Tamas Berghammer
Greg Clayton
Enrico Granata
Malcolm Parsons
Kate Stone
Ulrich Weigand
Marianne Mailhot-Sarrasin