The current strategy LICM uses when sinking for debuginfo is
that of picking the debug location of one of the uses.
This causes stepping to be wrong sometimes, see, e.g. PR45523.
This patch introduces a generalization of getMergedLocation(),
that operates on a vector of locations instead of two, and try
to merge all them together, and use the new API in LICM.
<rdar://problem/61750950>
When compiling
```
struct S {
float w;
};
void f(long w, long b);
void g(struct S s) {
int w = s.w;
f(w, w*4);
}
```
I get Assertion failed: ((!CombinedExpr || CombinedExpr->isValid()) && "Combined debug expression is invalid").
That's because we combine two epxressions that both end in DW_OP_stack_value:
```
(lldb) p Expr->dump()
!DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 32, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 64, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_stack_value)
(lldb) p Param.Expr->dump()
!DIExpression(DW_OP_constu, 4, DW_OP_mul, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 32, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 64, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_stack_value)
(lldb) p CombinedExpr->isValid()
(bool) $0 = false
(lldb) p CombinedExpr->dump()
!DIExpression(4097, 32, 5, 4097, 64, 5, 16, 4, 30, 4097, 32, 5, 4097, 64, 5, 159, 159)
```
I believe that in this particular case combining two stack values is
safe, but I didn't want to sink the special handling into
DIExpression::append() because I do want everyone to think about what
they are doing.
Patch by Adrian Prantl.
Fixes PR45181.
rdar://problem/60383095
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76164
LLVM currently supports CSK_MD5 and CSK_SHA1 source file checksums in
debug info. This change adds support for CSK_SHA256 checksums.
The SHA256 checksums are supported by the CodeView debug format.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75785
In order for dsymutil to collect .apinotes files (which capture
attributes such as nullability, Swift import names, and availability),
I want to propose adding an apinotes: field to DIModule that gets
translated into a DW_AT_LLVM_apinotes (path) nested inside
DW_TAG_module. This will be primarily used by LLDB to indirectly
extract the Swift names of Clang declarations that were deserialized
from DWARF.
<rdar://problem/59514626>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75585
This is part of PR44213 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
When importing (system) Clang modules, LLDB needs to know which SDK
(e.g., MacOSX, iPhoneSimulator, ...) they came from. While the sysroot
attribute contains the absolute path to the SDK, this doesn't work
well when the debugger is run on a different machine than the
compiler, and the SDKs are installed in different directories. It thus
makes sense to just store the name of the SDK instead of the absolute
path, so it can be found relative to LLDB.
rdar://problem/51645582
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75646
Previously we would also accept DISubprograms that matched in name
only, but this doesn't appear to be necessary any more.
I did a Full and Thin LTO build of Clang and it completed without a warning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75213
in C++ templates."
This was reverted in 802b22b5c8 due to
missing .bc file and a chromium bot failure.
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1057559#c1
This revision address both of them.
Summary:
This patch adds support for debuginfo generation for defaulted
parameters in clang and also extends corresponding DebugMetadata/IR to support this feature.
Reviewers: probinson, aprantl, dblaikie
Reviewed By: aprantl, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73462
The Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll test is failing:
FAIL: LLVM :: Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll (5894 of 36324)
******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1'; /usr/local/google/home/thakis/src/llvm-project/out/gn/bin/llvm-dis -o - /usr/local/google/home/thakis/src/llvm-project/llvm/test/Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll.bc | /usr/local/google/home/thakis/src/llvm-project/out/gn/bin/FileCheck /usr/local/google/home/thakis/src/llvm-project/llvm/test/Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll
--
Exit Code: 2
Command Output (stderr):
--
It looks like the Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll.bc file was never checked in.
This reverts commit c2b437d53d.
in C++ templates.
Summary:
This patch adds support for debuginfo generation for defaulted
parameters in clang and also extends corresponding DebugMetadata/IR to support this feature.
Reviewers: probinson, aprantl, dblaikie
Reviewed By: aprantl, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73462
[this re-applies c0176916a4
with the correct commit message and phabricator link]
This addresses point 1 of PR44213.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
The DW_AT_LLVM_sysroot attribute is used for Clang module debug info,
to allow LLDB to import a Clang module from source. Currently it is
part of each DW_TAG_module, however, it is the same for all modules in
a compile unit. It is more efficient and less ambiguous to store it
once in the DW_TAG_compile_unit.
This should have no effect on DWARF consumers other than LLDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71732
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
This reverts commit 1f3dd83cc1, reapplying
commit bb1b0bc4e5.
The original commit failed on some builds seemingly due to the use of a
bracketed constructor with an std::array, i.e. `std::array<> arr({...})`.
Previously, LLVM had no functional way of performing casts inside of a
DIExpression(), which made salvaging cast instructions other than Noop
casts impossible. This patch enables the salvaging of casts by using the
DW_OP_LLVM_convert operator for SExt and Trunc instructions.
There is another issue which is exposed by this fix, in which fragment
DIExpressions (which are preserved more readily by this patch) for
values that must be split across registers in ISel trigger an assertion,
as the 'split' fragments extend beyond the bounds of the fragment
DIExpression causing an error. This patch also fixes this issue by
checking the fragment status of DIExpressions which are to be split, and
dropping fragments that are invalid.
The DebugVariable class is a class declared in LiveDebugValues.cpp which
is used to uniquely identify a single variable, using its source
variable, inline location, and fragment info to do so. This patch moves
this class into DebugInfoMetadata.h, making it available in a much
broader scope.
DIExpressions with shift operators should not be fragmented for the same
reason as arithmetic operators: carry over cannot be expressed from one
fragment to the other, so an invalid result would be produced.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70601
Summary:
Also, replace the SmallVector with a normal C array.
Reviewers: vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70498
DIExpression::isImplicit() did not handle DW_OP_LLVM_fragment
correctly. It was scanning the elements in the expression by
iterating from the end. But we do not know the position of
ops unless we iterate from the beginning of the expression,
since DW_OP:s and their operands are stored flat in the expression
list. The old code also assumed that a DW_OP_LLVM_fragment
only occupied one element in the expression list, but it actually
occupies three elements.
Summary:
Internally in LLVM's metadata we use DW_OP_entry_value operations with
the same semantics as DWARF; that is, its operand specifies the number
of bytes that the entry value covers.
At the time of emitting entry values we don't know the emitted size of
the DWARF expression that the entry value will cover. Currently the size
is hardcoded to 1 in DIExpression, and other values causes the verifier
to fail. As the size is 1, that effectively means that we can only have
valid entry values for registers that can be encoded in one byte, which
are the registers with DWARF numbers 0 to 31 (as they can be encoded as
single-byte DW_OP_reg0..DW_OP_reg31 rather than a multi-byte
DW_OP_regx). It is a bit confusing, but it seems like llvm-dwarfdump
will print an operation "correctly", even if the byte size is less than
that, which may make it seem that we emit correct DWARF for registers
with DWARF numbers > 31. If you instead use readelf for such cases, it
will interpret the number of specified bytes as a DWARF expression. This
seems like a limitation in llvm-dwarfdump.
As suggested in D66746, a way forward would be to add an internal
variant of DW_OP_entry_value, DW_OP_LLVM_entry_value, whose operand
instead specifies the number of operations that the entry value covers,
and we then translate that into the byte size at the time of emission.
In this patch that internal operation is added. This patch keeps the
limitation that a entry value can only be applied to simple register
locations, but it will fix the issue with the size operand being
incorrect for DWARF numbers > 31.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, djtodoro, NikolaPrica
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: jyknight, fedor.sergeev, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67492
llvm-svn: 374881
Dump the DWARF information about call sites and call site parameters into
debug info sections.
The patch also provides an interface for the interpretation of instructions
that could load values of a call site parameters in order to generate DWARF
about the call site parameters.
([13/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60716
llvm-svn: 365467
Davide Italiano
Vedant Kumar
Arlo Siemsen
Adrian Prantl
Awanish Pandey
Hans Wennborg
stozer
David Stenberg
Bjorn Pettersson
Simon Pilgrim
Djordje Todorovic