Previously it parsed /proc/<pid>/maps for every module separately
resulting in a very slow response time. This CL add some caching and
optimizes the implementation to improve the code from O(n*m) to O(n+m)
where n is the number of modules requested and m is the number of
files mapped into memory.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28233
llvm-svn: 290895
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
Summary:
We've had two copies of code for launching processes:
- one in NativeProcessLinux, used for launching debugged processes
- one in ProcessLauncherAndroid, used on android for launching all other kinds of processes
These have over time acquired support for various launch options, but neither supported all of
them. I now replace them with a single implementation ProcessLauncherLinux, which supports all
the options the individual versions supported and set it to be used to launch all processes on
linux.
This also works around the ETXTBSY issue on android when the process is started from the platform
instance, as that used to go through the version which did not contain the workaround.
Reviewers: tberghammer
Subscribers: tberghammer, danalbert, srhines, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22457
llvm-svn: 276288
Summary:
This removes one level of indirection, which was just packing and repacking launch args into
different structures. NFC.
Reviewers: tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22357
llvm-svn: 275544
Summary:
We are seeing infrequent failures to launch the inferior process on android. The failing call
seems to be execve(). This adds more logging to see the actual error reported by the call.
Reviewers: tberghammer
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits, danalbert
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22039
llvm-svn: 274624
Summary:
This removes the last usage of the Platform plugin in NPL. It was being
used for determining the architecture of the debugged process. I replace
the call that went through the Platform plugin with a lower level call
on the ObjectFile directly.
Reviewers: tberghammer
Subscribers: uweigand, nitesh.jain, omjavaid, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21324
llvm-svn: 272686
NPL now assumes it is running from a single thread now, so its thread-safety is untested
anyway (and if that assumption is broken, we'll have bigger problems (due to ptrace restrictions)
than a couple of missing mutexes).
llvm-svn: 269640
Summary:
On arm64, linux<=4.4 and Android<=M there is a bug, which prevents single-stepping from working when
the system comes back from suspend, because of incorrectly initialized CPUs. This did not really
affect Android<M, because it did not use software suspend, but it is a problem for M, which uses
suspend (doze) quite extensively. Fortunately, it seems that the first CPU is not affected by
this bug, so this commit implements a workaround by forcing the inferior to execute on the first
cpu whenever we are doing single stepping.
While inside, I have moved the implementations of Resume() and SingleStep() to the thread class
(instead of process).
Reviewers: tberghammer, ovyalov
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, tberghammer, danalbert, srhines, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17509
llvm-svn: 261636
Summary:
Most NPL private functions took (shared) pointers to threads as arguments. This meant that the
callee could not be sure if the pointer was valid and so most functions were peppered with
null-checks. Now, I move the check closer to the source, and pass around the threads as
references (which are then assumed to be valid).
Reviewers: tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12237
llvm-svn: 245831
Summary:
NPL used to be peppered with casts of the NativeThreadProtocol objects into NativeThreadLinux. I
move these closer to the source where we obtain these objects. This way, the rest of the code can
assume we are working with the correct type of objects.
Reviewers: ovyalov, tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12187
llvm-svn: 245681
Summary:
There was a bug in NativeProcessLinux, where doing an instruction-level single-step over the
thread-creation syscall resulted in loss of control over the inferior. This happened because
after the inferior entered the thread-creation maintenance stop, we unconditionally performed a
PTRACE_CONT, even though the original intention was to do a PTRACE_SINGLESTEP. This is fixed by
storing the original state of the thread before the stop (stepping or running) and then
performing the appropriate action when resuming.
I also get rid of the callback in the ThreadContext structure, which stored the lambda used to
resume the thread, but which was not used consistently.
A test verifying the correctness of the new behavior is included.
Reviewers: ovyalov, tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12104
llvm-svn: 245545
Summary:
This commit integrates MainLoop into NativeProcessLinux. By registering a SIGCHLD handler with
the llgs main loop, we can get rid of the special monitor thread in NPL, which saves as a lot of
thread ping-pong when responding to client requests (e.g. qThreadInfo processing time has been
reduced by about 40%). It also makes the code simpler, IMHO.
Reviewers: ovyalov, clayborg, tberghammer, chaoren
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11150
This is a resubmission of r242305 after it was reverted due to bad interactions with the stdio
thread.
llvm-svn: 242783
Summary:
This commit integrates MainLoop into NativeProcessLinux. By registering a SIGCHLD handler with
the llgs main loop, we can get rid of the special monitor thread in NPL, which saves as a lot of
thread ping-pong when responding to client requests (e.g. qThreadInfo processing time has been
reduced by about 40%). It also makes the code simpler, IMHO.
Reviewers: ovyalov, clayborg, tberghammer, chaoren
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11150
llvm-svn: 242305
Summary:
This commit avoids the Platform instance when spawning or attaching to a process in lldb-server.
Instead, I have the server call a (static) method of NativeProcessProtocol directly. The reason
for this is that I believe that NativeProcessProtocol should be decoupled from the Platform
(after all, it always knows which platform it is running on, unlike the rest of lldb).
Additionally, the kind of platform actions a NativeProcessProtocol instance is likely to differ
greatly from the platform actions of the lldb client, so I think the separation makes sense.
After this, the only dependency NativeProcessLinux has on PlatformLinux is the ResolveExecutable
method, which needs additional refactoring.
This is a resubmit of r241672, after it was reverted due to build failueres on non-linux
platforms.
Reviewers: ovyalov, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10996
llvm-svn: 241796
platform-specific symbols that are not implemented on OS X.
The build error that caused this is
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"lldb_private::NativeProcessProtocol::Attach(unsigned long long, lldb_private::NativeProcessProtocol::NativeDelegate&, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::NativeProcessProtocol>&)", referenced from:
lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS::AttachToProcess(unsigned long long) in liblldb-core.a(GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS.o)
"lldb_private::NativeProcessProtocol::Launch(lldb_private::ProcessLaunchInfo&, lldb_private::NativeProcessProtocol::NativeDelegate&, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::NativeProcessProtocol>&)", referenced from:
lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS::LaunchProcess() in liblldb-core.a(GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS.o)
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
llvm-svn: 241688
Summary:
This commit avoids the Platform instance when spawning or attaching to a process in lldb-server.
Instead, I have the server call a (static) method of NativeProcessProtocol directly. The reason
for this is that I believe that NativeProcessProtocol should be decoupled from the Platform
(after all, it always knows which platform it is running on, unlike the rest of lldb).
Additionally, the kind of platform actions a NativeProcessProtocol instance is likely to differ
greatly from the platform actions of the lldb client, so I think the separation makes sense.
After this, the only dependency NativeProcessLinux has on PlatformLinux is the ResolveExecutable
method, which needs additional refactoring.
Reviewers: ovyalov, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10996
llvm-svn: 241672
Summary:
This changes PtraceWrapper to return an Error, while the actual result is in an pointer parameter
(instead of the other way around). Also made a couple of PtraceWrapper arguments default to zero.
This arrangement makes a lot of the code much simpler.
Test Plan: Tests pass on linux. It compiles on android arm64/mips64.
Reviewers: chaoren, mohit.bhakkad
Subscribers: tberghammer, aemerson, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10808
llvm-svn: 241079
Summary:
This removes a lot of boilerplate, which was needed to execute monitor operations. Previously one
needed do declare a separate class for each operation which would manually capture all needed
arguments, which was very verbose. In addition to less code, I believe this also makes the code
more readable, since now the implementation of the operation can be physically closer to the code
that invokes it.
Test Plan: Code compiles on x86, arm and mips, tests pass on x86 linux.
Reviewers: tberghammer, chaoren
Subscribers: aemerson, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10694
llvm-svn: 240772
Summary:
This should solve the issue of sending denormalized paths over gdb-remote
if we stick to GetPath(false) in GDBRemoteCommunicationClient, and let the
server handle any denormalization.
Reviewers: ovyalov, zturner, vharron, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: tberghammer, emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9728
llvm-svn: 238604
This change reorganize the register read/write code inside lldb-server on Linux
with moving the architecture independent code into a new class called
NativeRegisterContextLinux and all of the architecture dependent code into the
appropriate NativeRegisterContextLinux_* class. As part of it the compilation of
the architecture specific register contexts are only compiled on the specific
architecture because they can't be used in other cases.
The purpose of this change is to remove a lot of duplicated code from the different
register contexts and to remove the architecture dependent codes from the global
NativeProcessLinux class.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9935
llvm-svn: 238196
Summary:
There was an issue in NPL, where we attempted removal of temporary breakpoints (used to implement
software single stepping), while some threads of the process were running. This is a problem
since we currently always use the main thread's ID in the removal ptrace call. Therefore, if the
main thread was still running, the ptrace call would fail, and the software breakpoint would
remain, causing all kinds of problems. This change removes the breakpoints after all threads have
stopped. This fixes TestExitDuringStep on Android arm and can also potentially help in other
situations, as previously the breakpoint would not get removed if the thread stopped for another
reason.
Test Plan: TestExitDuringStep passes, other tests remain unchanged.
Reviewers: tberghammer
Subscribers: tberghammer, aemerson, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9792
llvm-svn: 237448
Tamas Berghammer
Kate Stone
Pavel Labath
Omair Javaid
Sean Callanan
Chaoren Lin