Summary:
Detection of C strings does not work well for pointers. If the value object holding a (char*) pointer does not have an address (e.g., if it is a temp), the value is not considered a C string and its formatting is left to DumpDataExtractor rather than the special handling in ValueObject::DumpPrintableRepresentation. This leads to inconsistent outputs, e.g., in escaping non-ASCII characters. See the test for an example; the second test expectation is not met (without this patch). With this patch, the C string detection only insists that the pointer value is valid. The patch makes the code consistent with how the pointer is obtained in ValueObject::ReadPointedString.
Reviewers: teemperor
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76650
There an option: EvaluateExpressionOptions::SetResultIsInternal to indicate
whether the result number should be returned to the pool or not. It
got broken when the PersistentExpressionState was refactored.
This fixes the issue and provides a test of the behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76532
Beside these two functions just being wrappers around GetTypeName they are also
just a leftover from migrating the CompilerType interface to ConstString.
Summary:
The only use of this class was to implement the SharedCluster of ValueObjects.
However, the same functionality can be implemented using a regular
std::shared_ptr, and its little-known "sub-object pointer" feature, where the
pointer can point to one thing, but actually delete something else when it goes
out of scope.
This patch reimplements SharedCluster using this feature --
SharedClusterPointer::GetObject now returns a std::shared_pointer which points
to the ValueObject, but actually owns the whole cluster. The only change I
needed to make here is that now the SharedCluster object needs to be created
before the root ValueObject. This means that all private ValueObject
constructors get a ClusterManager argument, and their static Create functions do
the create-a-manager-and-pass-it-to-value-object dance.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, jingham
Subscribers: mgorny, jfb, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74153
StringRef will call strlen on the C string which is inefficient (as ConstString already
knows the string lenght and so does StringRef). This patch replaces all those calls
with GetStringRef() which doesn't recompute the length.
I previously removed the code in ValueObject::GetExpressionPath that
took advantage of the parameter `qualify_cxx_base_classes`. As a result,
this is now unused and can be removed.
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
This method has exactly one call site, which is only actually executed
if `ValueObject::IsBaseClass` returns false. However, the first thing
that `ValueObject::GetBaseClassPath` does is check if `ValueObject::IsBaseClass`
is true. Because this can never be the case, this method always returns false
and is therefore effectively dead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73517
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
Summary:
This commit renames ClangASTContext to TypeSystemClang to better reflect what this class is actually supposed to do
(implement the TypeSystem interface for Clang). It also gets rid of the very confusing situation that we have both a
`clang::ASTContext` and a `ClangASTContext` in clang (which sometimes causes Clang people to think I'm fiddling
with Clang's ASTContext when I'm actually just doing LLDB work).
I also have plans to potentially have multiple clang::ASTContext instances associated with one ClangASTContext so
the ASTContext naming will then become even more confusing to people.
Reviewers: #lldb, aprantl, shafik, clayborg, labath, JDevlieghere, davide, espindola, jdoerfert, xiaobai
Reviewed By: clayborg, labath, xiaobai
Subscribers: wuzish, emaste, nemanjai, mgorny, kbarton, MaskRay, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, jingham, xiaobai, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72684
Summary:
The ValueObject code checks for a special `$$dereference$$` synthetic
child to allow formatter providers to implement a natural
dereferencing behavior in `frame variable` for objects like smart
pointers.
This support was broken when used directly throught the Python API and
not trhough `frame variable`. The reason is that
SBFrame.FindVariable() will return by default the synthetic variable
if it exists, while `frame variable` will not do this eagerly. The
code in `ValueObject::Dereference()` accounted for the latter but not
for the former. The fix is trivial. The test change includes
additional covergage for the already-working bahevior as it wasn't
covered by the testsuite before.
This commit also adds a short piece of documentatione explaining that
it is possible (even advisable) to provide this synthetic child
outstide of the range of the normal children.
Reviewers: jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73053
This is a half-implemented feature that as far as we can tell was
never used by anything since its original inclusion in 2014. This
patch removes it to make remaining the code easier to understand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71310
As suggested by Pavel in a code review:
> Can we replace this (and maybe python too, while at it) with a
> Host/Config.h entry? A global definition means that one has to
> recompile everything when these change in any way, whereas in
> practice only a handful of files need this..
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71280
This is a non-Swift-specific change in swift-lldb that seems to be
useful for remote debugging. If does in fact turn out to be redundant
we can remove it from llvm.org and then it will disappear in
swift-lldb, too.
Summary:
Instead of filling out a std::string and returning a bool to indicate
success, returning a std::string directly and testing to see if it's
empty seems like a cleaner solution overall.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69641
Summary:
This patch fixes a crash encountered when debugging optimized code. If some
variable has been completely optimized out, but it's value is nonetheless known,
the compiler can replace it with a DWARF expression computing its value. The
evaluating these expressions results in a eValueTypeHostAddress Value object, as
it's contents are computed into an lldb buffer. However, any value that is
obtained by dereferencing pointers in this object should no longer have the
"host" address type.
Lldb had code to account for this, but it was only present in the
ValueObjectVariable class. This wasn't enough when the object being described
was a struct, as then the object holding the actual pointer was a
ValueObjectChild. This caused lldb to dereference the contained pointer in the
context of the host process and crash.
Though I am not an expert on ValueObjects, it seems to me that this children
address type logic should apply to all types of objects (and indeed, applying
applying the same logic to ValueObjectChild fixes the crash). Therefore, I move
this code to the base class, and arrange it to be run everytime the value is
updated.
The test case is a reduced and simplified version of the original debug info
triggering the crash. Originally we were dealing with a local variable, but as
these require a running process to display, I changed it to use a global one
instead.
Reviewers: jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69273
While generating the Doxygen I noticed this lone namespace that has one
class and one function in it. This moves them into lldb_private.
llvm-svn: 369485
Value::GetValueAsData() takes an undocumented parameter called
data_offset that is always 0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65910
llvm-svn: 368330
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF
macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format
strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.
So instead of writing:
if (log)
log->Printf("%s\n", str);
You'd write:
LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);
This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the
spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line
replacements with it.
find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \
sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128
llvm-svn: 366936
Summary:
When trying to ascertain what language a variable belongs to, just
checking the compilation unit is often not enough. In r364845 I added a way to
check for a variable's language type, but didn't put it in Variable itself.
Let's go ahead and put it in Variable.
Reviewers: jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64042
llvm-svn: 366733