1. created a common completion for breakpoint names;
2. bound the breakpoint name common completion with eArgTypeBreakpointName;
3. implemented the dedicated completion for breakpoint read -N.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80693
1. Added a common completion ModuleUUIDs to provide a list of the UUIDs of modules for completion;
2. Added a new enumeration item eArgTypeModuleUUID to CommandArgumentType which is set as the option argument type of OptionGroupUUID;
3. Applied the module UUID completion to the argument of the type eArgTypeModuleUUID in lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandObject.cpp;
4. Added an related test case in lldb/test/API/functionalities/completion/TestCompletion.py.
Commands frame select and thread backtrace -s can be completed in the same way.
Moved the dedicated completion of frame select into a common completion and
apply it to the both commands, along with the test modified.
1. Added a new common completion TypeLanguages to provide a list of supporting languages;
2. Bound the completion to eArgTypeLanguage;
3. Added a related test case.
1.Added a new common completion DisassemblyFlavors;
2. Bound DisassemblyFlavors to argument of type eArgTypeDisassemblyFlavor in
CommandObject.cpp;
3. Added a related test case.
file:line:column form that we use to print out locations. Since we
print them this way it makes sense we also accept that form.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83975
This patch remove the indentation before the command help output.
Supposedly it was meant to be aligned with the different subcommands.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81783
Color the error: and warning: part of the CommandReturnObject output,
similar to how an error is printed from the driver when colors are
enabled.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81058
Summary: `CommandObject::CheckRequirements` requires cleaning up `m_exe_ctx`
between commands. Function `HandleOptionCompletion` returns without cleaning up
`m_exe_ctx` could cause assert failure in later `CheckRequirements`.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: teemperor
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80447
--script-language python and --script-language lua are both valid now.
Reviewed by: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77241
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
We were incorrectly parsing the -C argument to breakpoint set as the
column breakpoint, even though according to the help this should be the
breakpoint command. This fixes that by renaming the option to -u, adding
it to help, and adding a test case.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73284
The StringRef should always be identical to the C string, so we
might as well just create the StringRef from the C-string. This
might be slightly slower until we implement the storage of ArgEntry
with a string instead of a std::unique_ptr<char[]>. Until then we
have to do the additional strlen on the C string to construct the
StringRef.
llvm-svn: 371842
Summary:
We currently have several CommandObjects that manually reimplement the checking for a selected target
or a target in the execution context (which is the selected target when they are invoked). This patch removes
all these checks and replaces them by setting the eCommandRequiresTarget flag that Pavel suggested. With
this flag we are doing the same check but without having to duplicate this code in all these CommandObjects.
I also added a `GetSelectedTarget()` variant of the `GetSelectedOrDummyTarget()` function to the
CommandObject that checks that the flag is set and then returns a reference to the target. I didn't rewrite
all the `target` variables from `Target *` to `Target &` in this patch as last time this change caused a lot of merge
conflicts in Swift and I would prefer having that in a separate NFC commit.
Reviewers: labath, clayborg
Reviewed By: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: clayborg, JDevlieghere, jingham, amccarth, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66863
llvm-svn: 370571
Summary:
We always have a dummy target, so any error handling regarding a missing dummy target is dead code now.
Also makes the CommandObject methods that return Target& to express this fact in the API.
This patch just for the CommandObject part of LLDB. I'll migrate the rest of LLDB in a follow-up patch that's WIP.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66737
llvm-svn: 369939
Summary:
We still have some leftovers of the old completion API in the internals of
LLDB that haven't been replaced by the new CompletionRequest. These leftovers
are:
* The return values (int/size_t) in all completion functions.
* Our result array that starts indexing at 1.
* `WordComplete` mode.
I didn't replace them back then because it's tricky to figure out what exactly they
are used for and the completion code is relatively untested. I finally got around
to writing more tests for the API and understanding the semantics, so I think it's
a good time to get rid of them.
A few words why those things should be removed/replaced:
* The return values are really cryptic, partly redundant and rarely documented.
They are also completely ignored by Xcode, so whatever information they contain will end up
breaking Xcode's completion mechanism. They are also partly impossible to even implement
as we assign negative values special meaning and our completion API sometimes returns size_t.
Completion functions are supposed to return -2 to rewrite the current line. We seem to use this
in some untested code path to expand the history repeat character to the full command, but
I haven't figured out why that doesn't work at the moment.
Completion functions return -1 to 'insert the completion character', but that isn't implemented
(even though we seem to activate this feature in LLDB sometimes).
All positive values have to match the number of results. This is obviously just redundant information
as the user can just look at the result list to get that information (which is what Xcode does).
* The result array that starts indexing at 1 is obviously unexpected. The first element of the array is
reserved for the common prefix of all completions (e.g. "foobar" and "footar" -> "foo"). The idea is
that we calculate this to make the life of the API caller easier, but obviously forcing people to have
1-based indices is not helpful (or even worse, forces them to manually copy the results to make it
0-based like Xcode has to do).
* The `WordComplete` mode indicates that LLDB should enter a space behind the completion. The
idea is that we let the top-level API know that we just provided a full completion. Interestingly we
`WordComplete` is just a single bool that somehow represents all N completions. And we always
provide full completions in LLDB, so in theory it should always be true.
The only use it currently serves is providing redundant information about whether we have a single
definitive completion or not (which we already know from the number of results we get).
This patch essentially removes `WordComplete` mode and makes the result array indexed from 0.
It also removes all return values from all internal completion functions. The only non-redundant information
they contain is about rewriting the current line (which is broken), so that functionality was moved
to the CompletionRequest API. So you can now do `addCompletion("blub", "description", CompletionMode::RewriteLine)`
to do the same.
For the SB API we emulate the old behaviour by making the array indexed from 1 again with the common
prefix at index 0. I didn't keep the special negative return codes as we either never sent them before (e.g. -2) or we
didn't even implement them in the Editline handler (e.g. -1).
I tried to keep this patch minimal and I'm aware we can probably now even further simplify a bunch of related code,
but I would prefer doing this in follow-up NFC commits
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66536
llvm-svn: 369624
Originally I wanted to remove the RegularExpression class in Utility and
replace it with llvm::Regex. However, during that transition I noticed
that there are several places where need the regular expression string.
So instead I propose to keep the RegularExpression class and make it a
thin wrapper around llvm::Regex.
This patch also removes the workaround for empty regular expressions.
The result is that we are now (more or less) POSIX conformant.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66174
llvm-svn: 369153
This is part two of the change started in r359330. This patch moves the
ownership of the script interpreter from the command interpreter into
the debugger. I would've preferred to remove the lazy initialization,
however the fact that the scripting language is set after the debugger
is created makes that tricky. So for now this does exactly the same
thing as when it was under the command interpreter. The result is that
this patch is fully NFC.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61211
llvm-svn: 359354
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
Gongyu Deng
Jim Ingham
Jonas Devlieghere
Raphael Isemann
Ed Maste
Benjamin Kramer
Adrian Prantl