The "type" argument to the function is mostly useless -- the only
interesting aspect of it is signedness. Pass signedness directly and
compute the value of bits and signedness fields -- that's exactly
what the single caller of this function does.
Previously, we were simply ignoring them and continuing the evaluation.
This behavior does not seem useful, because the resulting value will
most likely be completely bogus.
Summary:
The code changes are very straight-forward -- just handle both DW_AT_GNU
and DW_AT_call versions of all tags and attributes. There is just one
small gotcha: in the GNU version, DW_AT_low_pc was used both for the
"return pc" and the "call pc" values, depending on whether the tag was
describing a tail call, while the official scheme uses different
attributes for the two things.
Reviewers: vsk, dblaikie
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80519
The llvm DWARFExpression dump is nearly identical, but better -- for
example it does print a spurious space after zero-argument expressions.
Some parts of our code (variable locations) have been already switched
to llvm-based expression dumping. This switches the remainder: unwind
plans and some unit tests.
Originally committed as 416fa7720e
Reverted (due to buildbot failure - breaking lldb) in 7a45aeacf3.
I still can't seem to build lldb locally, but Pavel Labath has kindly
provided a potential fix to preserve the old behavior in lldb by
registering a simple recoverable error handler there that prints to the
desired stream in lldb, rather than stderr.
This patch fixes a crash that happens on the DWARF expression evaluator
when trying to access the top of the stack while it's empty.
rdar://60512489
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77108
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
This patch fixes a crash that happens on the DWARF expression evaluator
when trying to access the top of the stack while it's empty.
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
and document the shortcomings of LLDB's partially defined DW_OP_piece
handling.
This would manifest as "DW_OP_piece for offset foo but top of stack is
of size bar".
rdar://problem/46262998
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72880
By switching to Scalars that are backed by explicitly-sized APInts we
can avoid a bug that increases the buffer reserved for a small piece
to the next-largest host integer type.
This manifests as "DW_OP_piece for offset foo but top of stack is of size bar".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72879
Summary:
Our code was expecting that a single (symbol) file contains only one
kind of location lists. This is not correct (on non-apple platforms, at
least) as a file can compile units with different dwarf versions.
This patch moves the deteremination of location list flavour down to the
compile unit level, fixing this problem. I have also tried to rougly
align the code with the llvm DWARFUnit. Fully matching the API is not
possible because of how lldb's DWARFExpression lives separately from the
rest of the DWARF code, but this is at least a step in the right
direction.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, clayborg
Subscribers: dblaikie, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71751
Summary:
This patch deletes the lldb location list parser and teaches the
DWARFExpression class to use the parser in llvm instead. I have
centralized all the places doing the parsing into a single
GetLocationExpression function.
In theory the the actual location list parsing should be covered by llvm
tests, and this glue code by our existing location list tests, but since
we don't have that many location list tests, I've tried to extend the
coverage a bit by adding some explicit dwarf5 loclist handling and a
test of the dumping code.
For DWARF4 location lists this should be NFC (modulo small differences
in error handling which should only show up on invalid inputs). In case
of DWARF5, this fixes various missing bits of functionality, most
notably, the lack of support for DW_LLE_offset_pair.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, dblaikie
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71003
Summary:
Lldb support base address selection entries in location lists was broken
for a long time. This wasn't noticed until llvm started producing these
kinds of entries more frequently with r374600.
In r374769, I made a quick patch which added sufficient support for them
to get the test suite to pass. However, I did not fully understand how
this code operates, and so the fix was not complete. Specifically, what
was lacking was the ability to handle modules which were not loaded at
their preferred load address (for instance, due to ASLR).
Now that I better understand how this code works, I've come to the
conclusion that the current setup does not provide enough information
to correctly process these entries. In the current setup the location
lists were parameterized by two addresses:
- the distance of the function start from the start of the compile unit.
The purpose of this was to make the location ranges relative to the
start of the function.
- the actual address where the function was loaded at. With this the
function-start-relative ranges can be translated to actual memory
locations.
The reason for the two values, instead of just one (the load bias) is (I
think) MachO, where the debug info in the object files will appear to be
relative to the address zero, but the actual code it refers to
can be moved and reordered by the linker. This means that the location
lists need to be "linked" to reflect the locations in the actual linked
file.
These two bits of information were enough to correctly process location
lists which do not contain base address selection entries (and so all
entries are relative to the CU base). However, they don't work with
them because, in theory two base address can be completely unrelated (as
can happen for instace with hot/cold function splitting, where the
linker can reorder the two pars arbitrarily).
To fix that, I split the first parameter into two:
- the compile unit base address
- the function start address, as is known in the object file
The new algorithm becomes:
- the location lists are processed as they were meant to be processed.
The CU base address is used as the initial base address value. Base
address selection entries can set a new base.
- the difference between the "file" and "load" function start addresses
is used to compute the load bias. This value is added to the final
ranges to get the actual memory location.
This algorithm is correct for non-MachO debug info, as there the
location lists correctly describe the code in the final executable, and
the dynamic linker can just move the entire module, not pieces of it. It
will also be correct for MachO if the static linker preserves relative
positions of the various parts of the location lists -- I don't know
whether it actually does that, but judging by the lack of base address
selection support in dsymutil and lldb, this isn't something that has
come up in the past.
I add a test case which simulates the ASLR scenario and demonstrates
that base address selection entries now work correctly here.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, clayborg
Subscribers: dblaikie, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70532
Summary:
Yet another step on the long road towards getting rid of lldb's Stream class.
We probably should just make this some kind of member of Address/AddressRange, but it seems quite often we just push
in random integers in there and this is just about getting rid of Stream and not improving arbitrary APIs.
I had to rename another `DumpAddress` function in FormatEntity that is dumping the content of an address to make Clang happy.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71052
Summary:
I recently re-discovered that the unsinged stream operators of the
lldb_private::Stream class have a surprising behavior in that they print
the number in hex. This is all the more confusing because the "signed"
versions of those operators behave normally.
Now that, thanks to Raphael, each Stream class has a llvm::raw_ostream
wrapper, I think we should delete most of our formatting capabilities
and just delegate to that. This patch tests the water by just deleting
the operators with the most surprising behavior.
Most of the code using these operators was printing user_id_t values. It
wasn't fully consistent about prefixing them with "0x", but I've tried
to consistenly print it without that prefix, to make it more obviously
different from pointer values.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, jdoerfert
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70241
Split CallEdge into DirectCallEdge and IndirectCallEdge. Teach
DWARFExpression how to evaluate entry values in cases where the current
activation was created by an indirect call.
rdar://57094085
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70100
The DWARFExpression is parsing the location lists in about five places.
Of those, only one actually had proper support for base address
selection entries.
Since r374600, llvm has started to produce location expressions with
base address selection entries more aggresively, which caused some tests
to fail.
This patch adds support for these entries to the places which had it
missing, fixing the failing tests. It also adds a targeted test for the
two of the three fixes, which should continue testing this functionality
even if the llvm output changes. I am not aware of a way to write a
targeted test for the third fix (DWARFExpression::Evaluate).
llvm-svn: 374769
Summary:
It uses the new ability of ABI plugins to vend llvm::MCRegisterInfo
structs (which is what is needed to turn dwarf register numbers into
strings).
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, jasonmolenda
Subscribers: tatyana-krasnukha, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67966
llvm-svn: 373208
Jonas Devlieghere
Pavel Labath
David Blaikie
Med Ismail Bennani
Igor Kudrin
Raphael Isemann
Adrian Prantl
Vedant Kumar